What Is Rosalind Krauss Avant Garde

Avant-garde is the new and unusual or the experiment of ideas in the arts. Rosalind Krauss challenges many modern artists and art eras accusing them of coping one another, doubting the originality of “avant-garde” work. The question of originality in art is one that has is the main issue of the essay; perhaps it is most accurate to say that she has pushed the way thinking of art in another direction. Krauss, however, using the three examples of Rodin’s sculpture, Monet’s painting, and the widespread use of the grid in modern painting, essentially stating; originality is not found anymore. Krauss writes, “What would it look like not to repress the concept of the copy?” Krauss saw no originality in art. Modern art was seen as copying or having ideas based off of early works that carried meaning. Using the word “fraudulent”, as originality is no longer visual and is replaced by the idea of repetition is just. Krauss is not stating that art is a waste of time, or a fraud. That the usage of art and its ideas have disappeared though time, Krauss does use the word “fraud,” in a way that defines the value of the relationship between originality and repetition. The idea for originality has been buried, and the idea of repetition is disdained that the …show more content…
Using Rodin’s sculpture after his death a fraud is to another way of a post-modern artist to cling to the concept that being avant-garde will give art a blank slate to give itself an original concept. Krauss uses a “grid” that art fits that avant-garde into stating, “The absolute stasis of the grid, its lack of hierarchy, of center, of inflection, emphasizes not only its antireferential character, but—more importantly—its hostility to narrative .” Krauss says this grid is an imitation as it mimics a canvas, as the canvas came before the gird. Artists that paint cannot explore areas outside of their comfort zone and will often repeat art that they have seen