What Are The Pros And Cons Of The League Of Nations Essay

Improved Essays
The year of 1938 was a scary time for the majority of European people due to the threat of Nazi Germany. Under the control of Adolf Hitler, Germany was expanding its borders and was gaining power and support of the German people. The League of Nations was created to stop another massive war from happening. Many believed that it was the League’s responsibility to deal with Hitler’s aggressive stance on taking over nations. The problem was that the League could not agree with an action to stop Hitler also they did not see the threat of Hitler because he was just taking over country’s that had a large population of Germans. With this threat expanding west, France and Britain started to feel as if their national security was starting to be threatened. …show more content…
They both had a good argument for each stance. Churchill wanted to keep Germany from thinking they could do whatever they wanted, he felt it would have been better to show Germany that they couldn’t just do whatever they wanted. Chamberlain believed that to start another war was not in the best intentions of Europe. Many nations were still rebuilding from the last war and no one was ready for another devastating conflict like the last one. I believe that these arguments of both men can be related to today’s time. For example in some cases we should try to avoid war by negotiating, also you can see that creating a treaty during a war to end it is also a form of appeasement. An example of this would be how Russia is becoming a threat once again, the United States is using an appeasement method with this situation and so far it seems to be working. On the other side I feel that responding to threat with action can be useful but very dangerous. An example of this would be after 9/11 we may not have declared war but we have punished those who were responsible for what happened. War is never a good situation but as history proves sometimes peace will not always work and a strong response is sometimes necessary to protect the best interests of a

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Since the Treaty was enforced by nuclear powers in our scenario, and rational leaders would be deterred by this fact before violating the Treaty. However, due to Hitler’s ambition for empire, he can be categorized as an irrational leader, so I don’t believe he would be deterred by nuclear weapons. For Hitler, undoing the Treaty was the first step in accomplishing his desire for empire. Besides, at a times when Germany started violating the Treaty, countries worldwide were suffering from Great Depression, France and Britain were still recovering from WWI. From Hitler’s point of view, the French and British were too weak to enforce the Treaty.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the 1930’s, World War II was something that many countries were desperately trying to avoid. This was a task found as nearly impossible, due to Germany’s fascist leader who craved more and more power. The country’s leaders weren’t sure whether they should use an appeasement, or collective security to deal with him. Also, there were many things that were done to begin this Second World War. The reason why WWI happened is mostly because of Hitler and his violent actions, and the best way to deal with Hitler’s aggression is by using collective security.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The incoming government, the Weimar Republic, was faced with the pressure of the treaty shortly after they were elected as the new German government. German delegates from the Weimar Republic stated, “The deeper we penetrated into the spirit of this Treaty, the more we became convinced of its impracticability. The demands raised go beyond the power of the German Nation....” (document I). The Germans thought that the treaty was overwhelming and unreachable. Although the delegates tried to reject the treaty, they signed it because it was better than going back to another war.…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How To Prevent Ww2

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages

    intervention who believed that America had not done enough to prevent from reaching a catastrophic level. Furthermore, due to influence the country held, there was a moral obligation to use every resource available to provide a safe haven. Violence and persecution toward the Jews had begun in Germany before the Holocaust had begun particularly with the pogroms that began after the annexation of Austria (13). The U.S. could have easily filled the existing immigration quotas without changing any of the laws (13). However, the government was far more occupied with the reelection of Roosevelt, and allowed the anti-Semitism expressed to skew their decision making.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    George was unhappy with point 2 of the fourteen points, which stated there would be “free access to the seas in peacetime and wartime”. Wilson’s views on people ruling themselves also represented a great threat to the Britain Empire as they ruled millions of people all across the world. 4. How fair was the treaty of Versailles? The treaty of Versailles was created with the intention of weakening Germany.…

    • 1674 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If Germany was not punished harshly, the Americans with a strong sense of nationalism would be mad; however if Germany was punished harshly, the German-Americans would be upset. So the United States had to find that balance to attempt to please their wide variety of people. The League of Nations and Treaty of Versailles was a good attempt at stopping another “Great War” from happening. But it left the participating countries vulnerable to another world war from happening. Because of all the treaties involved.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Overy said that Germany had communication problems between the Poland forces and the Western forces, which shows how the Western forces would refuse to provide Poland with armaments. From here, Hitler realized that the Western powers had no intentions of going to war against the Germans whatsoever (Overy, 78). According to Overy, he thinks that Hitler’s invasion, was not supposed to last so long or turn into a massive world war, because Hitler didn’t want to hurt the economy. Many people have tried to warn Hitler of the possible outcomes that can occur because of this war, but Hitler didn’t seem to care of what they had to say and even said so in one of his speeches on August 31, 1939. Overy adds that the war was brought by not only Hitler alone, but by making instability in the international system.…

    • 2220 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The United States’ decision to enter World War I was initially met with negative public opinion. The sheer diversity of the U.S. population made it impossible to support the effort. President Woodrow Wilson, who also wanted to be “neutral in fact as well as in name”, originally hoped to influence the postwar arrangements between the belligerents. However, he was compelled by German attacks on American people and the country’s integrity, leading him to ask Congress for a declaration of war against Germany. The Germans had dishonored previous agreements and they had provoked the United States with threats to take away land the country had rightfully gained.…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is a prime example of why the US should stop their act of being a world police. Those American lives did not need to be lost. Germany and Austria Hungary were fighting a two front war against France, Britain, and Russia and if the US would have not intervened the Germans would have probably still lost the war. Pat Buchanan asks “Why do we tax ourselves to defend rich nations who refuse to defend themselves? Is the security of Europe more important to us than to Europe?” The US gives other countries a false sense of reality that they do not need to defend themselves with their own functioning military, because the United States will do the job for them.…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the 1930s successive British governments adopted appeasement as their policy for dealing with Germany in the hope that it would prevent another war on the scale of the Great War. Pacifist attitudes among the British public was one reasons for this policy, however there were other reasons such as the fact that Britain implemented appeasement as Hitler’s demands appeared justifiable, the British military was not ready for war and Britain was lacking in reliable allies that would support them should war breakout. Finally, a fear of Communism spreading from Russia also prompted Britain’s policy of appeasement. This essay will argue that while pacifism did influence the government, it is more realistic to argue that it was these factors combined…

    • 1259 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays