We Exist By Rene Descartes

Improved Essays
René Descartes claimed that we should throw away all of our opinions and beliefs of the world because we can easily be deceived into believing the wrong things. The only claim that we can be sure of is that we exist. He based his argument on the possibility that we could be tricked in three different ways. We can be misled by our senses, our lives could be a very vivid dream, or we could be fooled by an evil demon. In this essay, I will argue that our knowledge of arithmetics and geometry will always be certain, even if we were under any of these three influences. In addition, I will explain how Descartes claim that we our senses could mislead us and that we are in a dream-like state is not possible. Descartes purposes that we need to dismiss all of our impressions and …show more content…
The fact that we are able to think, leads us to conclude that we certainly exist. Even though I agree with his famous saying: “I think, I exist” (Descartes 53), I still argue that we cannot be deceived about the concept of arithmetics and geometry. It may in fact be true that my vision would fail to show me distinct numbers of something, but the concept of (X) amount of things cannot be changed in my mind by an outside force. Since “counting” is the action of thinking in a numerical form, then the numbers derived from this act would be incomprehensible unless the concept is recognized as existing and true. Other simple natures such as shapes, can be substituted for “numbers”, if we follow the same line of thought. Again, if I were deceived into believing that the triangle in front of me is a square through optical illusions, but I cannot create the idea of a square when in fact does not exist in reality. Thus, the concept of these variables are ontologically dependent bodies because its product is certain whether or not these objects exist in

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    In Meditations on First Philosophy Rene Descartes attempts to reconcile a Christian metaphysics with a new epistemology contrary to the scholastic, Aristotelian worldview. He seeks new foundations that knowledge can be built upon and tries to accomplish this by identifying basic, indubitable axioms to derive more complex truths by. As Descartes had a background in mathematics and geometry, these tenets are proposed alike mathematical truths in that they are self-evidential. He calls these axioms ,”clear and distinct perceptions”. For the Cartesian epistemology and metaphysics to be plausible, these perceptions must be not only epistemologically privileged, but also universal and justifiable as mathematical truths are, in terms of semantics and self-evidentiality.…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes Meditations takes us on an intellectual, meditative, spiritual journey inward, questioning what exactly, if anything at all, we can know with certainty. Descartes was active in physics and mathematics, as he was interested in the potential of science to give us the truth about the world. Descartes believed that knowledge has secure foundations and and that all other knowledge rests upon these foundations. Hence, in order to establish what is “firm and constant in the sciences”, it is necessary to establish the very foundations of all knowledge so that he could use these principles to base the reasoning process upon. For Descartes, this meant removing all sensory prejudice.…

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, Barry Stroud and Elizabeth Wolgast provide different approaches to answer and understanding of the paradigm established in the argument. The context of the argument from ignorance that Descartes proposes is problematic when attempting to answer it . In Wolgast’s perspective, the argument from ignorance claims that the knowledge that one is not dreaming is a necessary condition to determine the existence of the external world. Under such circumstances, Wolgast claims that by considering ‘know’ as a necessary condition, then it becomes more difficult to provide evidence that will suffice the skeptic—…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes explores the nature of human perception through the mind as separated from the body. His meditations on the subject outline a number of principles regarding truth and understanding, but the Dream Argument for Skepticism is derived from a single principle. More specifically, Descartes explains that: "Accordingly, seeing that our senses sometimes deceive us, I was willing to suppose that there existed nothing really such as they presented to us; and because some men err in reasoning, and fall into paralogisms, even on the simplest matters of Geometry, I, convinced that I was as open to error as any other, rejected as false all the reasonings I had hitherto taken for demonstrations; and finally, when I considered that the very same…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosopher Rene Descartes wrote an influential piece named the “Meditations on First Philosophy.” In this work, his “First Meditation” mainly deals with doubt of existence and how doubt is made possible because of sensory deception. He creates the dream argument that argues about how it is possible to be uncertain about whether or not a person is in a real world or dream world. In philosopher G.E. Moore’s “Certainty” he attempts to debunk Descartes’ argument through showing the inconsistencies in his dream argument. Since Descartes’ argument is built on inconsistency, Moore’s replies are satisfactory.…

    • 1346 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rene Descartes’ statement, “I at least know for certain that nothing is certain” perfectly illustrates the multiple problems that arise when all rational beings realize that their senses can deceive them and that the very foundation of their knowledge is based on the assumption that everything they encounter is real. Thankfully, being aware of the problem is the first step in solving it. The juxtaposition of Rene Descartes and William Shakespeare reveals a difference of opinion when they set out to examine and solve the problems that arise from the doubtfulness of the knowledge provided by our senses. Although both authors agree on the importance of solitude and the potential problem of an evil genius manipulating our senses, Descartes’ use…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes says that when he is in a dream he can feel the heat of a fire even though the fire is not there. That feeling of warmth seems real even though he is asleep. Descartes senses deceive him which makes him question if his senses are always deceptive. In Conclusion, Descartes argues that one cannot prove we exist or are part of a concrete world.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rene Descartes work ‘Meditations on First Philosophy’ is filled with his many ideas on God, the relationship between the mind and body and the trustworthiness of things we believe to be true. The main focus of this essay is his arguments for distrusting the senses. These are the dreaming argument and the evil demon argument. Meditations begins with Descartes casting doubt on everything he once believed to be absolutely true. It is a search for absolute certainty.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Meditations of First Philosophy, Descartes explains philosophical meditations written over six days. The Second Meditation concerns the nature of the human mind. Descartes argues that the human mind is better known than the body. A major claim of his is his most famous quote “I think, therefore I am,” meaning a thinking thing, such as himself, can exist. In this essay, I will prove that Descartes’ argument in the Second Meditation for his existence as a thinking thing is convincing.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even though Descartes did not completely trust his senses, but he found that they were somehow significant for determining whether he was awake or dreaming. “… all my senses report the truth much more frequently than not”(p. 122). Descartes found that it was possible to tell whether he was asleep or awake. He used this finding as an answer to his doubt. In the Sixth Meditation, he states, “…in that dreams are never linked by memory with all the other actions of life as walking experiences are” (p. 122).…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although Descartes arguments are not to be taken as too literal, I do think he is correct that our senses can be easily deceived. The information we receive from our senses can be mistrusted and ruin the…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I will argue that Descartes, using his own criteria for making and avoiding mistakes, cannot be making a mistake when he proves the existence of God in meditation three in his Meditations on First Philosophy. I will develop my argument in two parts. First, I will present Descartes’s argument for how mistakes are made and avoided.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ideas are defined as whatever is perceived or understood about something; despite this simple denotation, humankind 's capacity to acquire and understand these complex thoughts remains a controversy in philosophical literature. As major role models in the foundation of modern philosophy, Descartes and Locke feud over the definition of these ideas, the acquisition of these concepts, and the content of these thoughts. Descartes identifies with a rationalistic view where knowledge is based on innate ideas and these ideas are acquired through reason, whereas Locke believes in empirical explanations which state that ideas are formulated from sensory experiences with the outside world. In many of Descartes’ works, he emphasizes the importance of…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout his “Meditations” Descartes will demonstrate that he is breaking away from the traditional way of thinking and metaphysics. And, throughout the text Descarte will lay out a foundation to a different way of thinking. One in which one does not solely rely on the senses to know things, but instead rely on an inspection of the mind. But, this conflicts with other philosophers of Descartes time, and it conflicts with what is being taught within the schools, Around Descartes time, many of the schools were using the writings of Aquinas and therefore Aristotle to teach, and they had become almost the center of philosophy. In this paper I will discuss and explain how Descartes’ views are different from the medieval and classical views of Aquinas and Aristotle.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    René Descartes first builds up his position in Meditations on First Philosophy by starting with pushing aside all that we know and learned as it was based on the empiricist thinking, that our beliefs are to be based on our sense experience, which is the perceived foundation of how everyone thinks. This way of thinking, according to Descartes, should be abandon as it is a defective way to do so when learning. Even thinking by numbers and figures are not a good foundation when gaining knowledge in Descartes’ Meditations, so he takes through his thoughts so that we come to same conclusion as him on why the methodological doubt should be used to better our understanding of the world. The beliefs we currently have are invalid since our senses…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics