Analysis Of The Communist Manifesto By Vladimir Illyich Ullyanov

Improved Essays
Vladimir Illyich Ulyanov, born in Simbirsk in April 10, 1987, he was the third oldest, with five brothers and sisters. In 1901 while doing underground work of his party he started going by the name Lenin. After a couple revolutions, he rose to become a powerful dictator in Russia. After World War I, he seized power with the October Revolution. Even though he had strong ideas he was still willing to change his ideas if his country needed it. When Lenin was a child his parents encouraged in him a love of learning and he used this to finish first in high school and showed a gift for Latin and Greek. His father was an inspector of schools, but experienced trouble including threats with early retirement by the government. Later, when his older …show more content…
This book outlined their ideas of the Communist revolution and planned out that the only way they could succeed is by a revolution. After reading this book, he analyzed it in his pamphlet “Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism”.2 Based on the writings of Marx and Engels, Lenin created the vanguard party as a means to bring upon the revolution talked about in the Communist Manifesto. According to Karl Marx, because the proletariats weren’t political people they needed a separate group to lead them through the changes needed to bring Communism. After creating the proletariats the vanguard party would usher in the revolution to take down capitalism. After the revolution succeeded they would give the ruling power to the proletariats who would rule over themselves.34 Following Karl Marx’s works, Lenin feared that the capitalists would take over the world and industry would exploit the working class to increase their profits and the wealthy countries would take advantage of the poorer countries. He theorized that the revolution would begin in poorer countries where the poor would rise up and overthrow …show more content…
Lenin considered that there needed to be nationalism among the oppressed people. He argued in his speeches that any country that oppresses another nation cannot truly be free. He concluded that the philosophies of Marxism and Bolshevism transcended nationalism and religion. Only by allowing the oppressed people to practice their own nationalism everyone can be free. Because of this he also wanted to get rid of religion. After World War I and the October Revolution Russia had most of it 's farms destroyed and food supplies gone. Needing to find a way to fix this problem, Lenin introduced the New Economic Policy, or the NEP, which gave back some private property to the peasants. He moved away from “war communism” where the people would always be at war. He also gave private land plots to some peasants where they could sell their surplus produce and allowed people to hand make limited items for sale in the free market. Although Vladimir Lenin and Joseph Stalin, born Joseph Vissarionovich, were in the same party, Stalin 's political influence caused Lenin’s suspension on his final goals. In part this was due to Stalin 's abuses against the country of Georgia and because he was amassing more administrative power that his position of General Secretary of the Communist Party should have. Lenin also believed in the right of self-determination for national and ethnic groups which Stalin was

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Although Marx’s idea of a Communist state appeared as a functional economic system that could replace the Russia’s oppressive autocratic governments of Czarist times, Soviet leaders failed to abide by the guidelines Marx had set for the development of a Communist state. One such requisite of Marxist ideology dictated that Communism must take place in an industrialized society. Contrarily, when Vladamir Lenin came to rule in 1917, Russia was ruled under an agrarian society that simply could not support the lives of the middle class. Russian conflict with its surrounding countries presented itself as yet another untimely factor that prevented the Soviet Communism from emerging as gracefully as Marx had envisioned. Amidst the development of the Communist regime, Russia became involved in international affairs, namely World War II, the space race, and the arms race. While concentrating their efforts on dealing with these external affairs, the Soviets failed to direct enough attention into ensuring that Russia transcend into Communism following the guidelines set by Marx. Furthermore, Marx envisioned such a Communist society to function free of crime and vice, yet the head of the…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Lenin was considered responsible for many things, one of them which was his propaganda. His political and beliefs, were read and study by others and several times would encourage them to take side of the Bolsheviks. He was seen as an influential leader, making revolution possible. He found himself facing exile in Siberia, however, he still managed to return with influential speeches and propaganda. He was the reason of the revolution, taking action in what he believed in. By his side stood Trotsky. Lenin and Trotsky escaped from exile in 1907. Lenin therefore, built trust on Trotsky to the point where he put him in charge of the post offices and communications, bridges and state…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Russian bourgeoisie’s involvement was a contributing cause to the proletariats revolting in 1917. The bourgeoisie didn’t want anything to change. “The bourgeoisie was seen as selfishly fighting to maintain the status quo (Revelations).” “It became absolutely clear that the bourgeoisie was a counter-revolutionary class which sought to enter into an agreement with the old Czarist regime for the perpetuation of the condition of half serfdom in order to subdue the proletariat (Revolution?).” They wanted to keep their nice things and were willing to sell the souls of the poor to do so. At some point, they became so desperate they tried “working” with the government. “The grain producers were willing to exchange their grain only for the greatest possible part of those goods which were still in the country; this would have injured the state, the working class and the poor villagers (Revolution?).” The bourgeoisie didn’t care about the other people, all they cared about was the fact that they weren’t rich anymore. The bourgeoisie couldn’t…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He introduces the New Economic policy as a means of addressing the peasants’ empty bellies, with a caveat given to the Congress of Political Education Departments that this policy would bring capitalism through the gates so to speak. Lenin argued that the only way to prevent capitalism from winning out, the average worker must not only be literate but must have some higher level of culture. In this Lenin is trying to cure the ‘cultural backwardness’ of the Russian people (pp. 12). Eliminating this backwardness is Lenin’s means of disarming the threat of capitalism invited into the country by the NEP, that is the internal threat of Capitalism.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Joseph Stalin, a prominent member of the Bolshevik party, and later one of the most important men in the twentieth century, took control of the Soviet Union after the death of Vladimir Lenin. From the beginning Stalin, had a clear vision of the direction the Soviet Union had to take. To Stalin, the answer to strengthen Russia was rapid industrialization. After all, Marxist theory ordained that a socialist society must be highly industrialized with an overwhelming preponderance of workers. Stalin’s rapid industrialization brought many failures that particularly affected peasants the most, but it also came to be one of the Soviet Union major achievements through history.…

    • 1001 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    When the Bolsheviks announced the formation of a government of Soviet workers and soldier deputies, they believed they were inaugurating the beginning of the transition from capitalism, a system they believed was based on exploitation, inequality and war, to communism. The divergence of statement and fact is one of the basic features of the communist movement. It is the institution of complete control of communication and expression in order to sustain the irrelevent theoretical picture. The communist mentality can be described in essence as a compulsive self-justifying opportunism, where leaders assume full freedoms of action but insist on squaring every step with the varieties of Marxism-Leninism. This viewpoint is a direct opposition to liberalism values, as liberalism stresses the importance of human rationality. Vladimir Lenin, founder of the Russian Communist Party, and the Bolsheviks believed that violent revolution was the only way to overturn the government and avoid further development of liberalism in Russia. The authoritarian bent in Lenin’s thinking only got stronger and the Soviet Union became a dictatorship with a ruling central government. In the years following the death of Vladimir Lenin in 1924, Stalin rose to become the leader of…

    • 1564 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The idea that workers would be in control and that the state would dissolve over time is one that certainly looks fine on paper, but in reality would never work. Marxism turned into Leninism when Vladimir Lenin realized that without government, many things such as foreign affairs would not go over well unless the entire world turned communist simultaneously. He realized that as long as the world had countries that competed in capitalistic ways for dominance, a state was needed with a leader to govern over the people and deal with other competing countries and he decided that when Russia was finally free from the Capitalist ruling system, there would be a dictatorship over the proletariat, by parties competing for the positions elected. In essence this leadership created more of socialism than communism, but the strong Marxist beliefs kept it mainly communist. The Vanguard party would be one of the few leading parties of the most power. While it started as a fair system, eventual civil wars and terrorism on opposing parties made the government ban any party except the Vanguard party. Being the sole party, the greed for power and wealth caused the power between the one dominant party and the proletariat workers to slowly shift into a imperial dictatorship, five years after Lenin died, when Joseph Stalin took control of Soviet Russia, his power and dictatorship increased tenfold. He used the media…

    • 1741 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Lenin was born in a wealthy middle-class family in Simbirsk, where his family’s relation sparked his interest in politics. As he grew up, his personality grew more and more dangerous,…

    • 171 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Autocracy In Russia Essay

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For the first time, workers who were once peasants now had cultural opportunities like evening classes, clubs, libraries, theatres, and mass entertainment, and in addition to that they became exposed to the political ideas of Social Democrats and Socialist Revolutionaries.4 These political ideas were captivating when the working class began to directly feel the crippling effects of modernization and the strains of WW1. Inflation had taken hold of the economy and as prices rose—sometimes tripled—wages remained unchanging, forcing a widespread hunger amongst the working class across the country. “The wretched conditions in which workers lived and their pitiful wages heightened their sense of separateness not only from the government but from privileged society in general,” and made the socialist ideas of regime change all too alluring. The government had a hope of introducing modernization while still keeping a firm hand of control over society, yet the effects of modernization which consisted of industrialization, urbanization, internal migration, and the introduction of various new social classes only served to further dismantle and wash away the autocratic foundations of the Tsarist regime.2 This collapse in the autocratic foundation through a crisis in modernization was the first step to allowing Lenin and the Bolshevik party to eventually gain control of the Russian…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Following Lenin’s death on 21st January 1924 there was a long struggle for power due to his failure to appoint a successor. Key candidates included victor Stalin as well as Trotsky, Bukharin, Zinoviev and Kamenev and there were several separate fights with constant changing of alliances and sides. Stalin, who was able to manipulate the party machine, use the weakness of opposition to his advantage be pragmatic with his policies and ideology and employ a certain element of luck was victorious and despite this array of methods he used, his manipulation of the party machine was key to his success in the leadership struggle as he was able to combine his devious personality and powerful positions in the party to emerge triumphant.…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The treatment of the poor was one of these. They treated the poor very cruelly. Also, the working conditions for the citizens were significantly poor. The city laborers experienced horrible service in the economy of the industrials. The lower class’ discontent was worsened by the scarcity of food and the failure of the military. Then, the military began to not listen to the Czar Nicholas II. Then, political insecurity ensued inside Russia. Vlademir Lenin wanted to “capitalize” the political structure. He wanted to take away the authority from the provisional government and place it with the…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The term was later known as Leninism, and its ideology was so powerful it reformed the nation in such way people believed it was a new religion. Marxism enforced the idea that a social transformation had to occur for the government to treat the popular masses with equal and basic rights, rather than with “capitalist exploitation, inhuman toil, [and] lack of all rights” (Hasegawa). The Soviet viewpoint of the Russian Revolution incarnates the paragon of the imperfect idea that was Marxism. Historians that reinforce the Soviet view of the Revolution claim that Lenin conquered the proletariat because the provisional government was not ensuring and perpetuating what the working class petitioned for. Its leaders were associated with the middle class, which brought discomfort and doubts. How could a government lead its people if it had nothing in common with them? They refused to give land in rural areas to peasants and decided to maintain the country in the War, which disquieted the people. They believe that “instead of being a destructive force, it seemed [that the Bolsheviks] were the only party in Russia with a constructive program and the power to impose it on the country”…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After centuries of neglect from the various Tsars, the common people of Russia successfully revolted against sovereign rule and established a new government, one that was intended to be for the working class. Spearheaded by Vladimir Lenin, Russia became the first Communist country, giving equal rights to all (including women) and distributing property evenly amongst peasants. Lenin was praised by the people of Russia for being a man that focused on the common good of all and had the best interests of the working class at heart. After his death, Joseph Stalin inherited the title as the leader of the Soviet Union. Though he was expected to carry out Lenin’s efforts and help keep Russia a communist nation, he instead ruled as a ruthless dictator,…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the interim, others see Lenin's system as proof of a man who held a "profound faith in the decency of man" and who utilized a "judgment skills approach" in adjusting Marxism to fit the states of the regressive primitive condition of Russia (Hill, 1971, pp. 144-148). Be that as it may, the enduring impact that the Russian Revolution had on Marxism can be seen more in the outcome of the power battle and in the subsequent advancement of the USSR. Lenin's "vote based centralism" soon developed into a one-party Bolshevik administration which managed over its kin in a way which was of finished complexity to Marx's socialist beliefs (Eccleshall, 2003, p. 86). As student of history Robert Service remarked, "Lenin's action guaranteed… a political…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Although the leaders of the Bolshevik revolution aimed to create a communist society in the USSR based on Marxism, however due to several reasons, the society (and state) they formed was different from the one envisioned by Marx. Marxism, in essence, is Karl Marx’s political ideology whereas communism is a society (and a political system) based on that ideology. The research paper explores this thesis by a comparative analysis of Marxist doctrines and its application as carried out by Lenin and his successors in the ‘Socialist’ USSR. In the above context, central questions that would be addressed would revolve around whether the communists were able to establish a classless society in the Soviet Union? Was the formation of a communist society…

    • 2903 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Great Essays