• Home Page
  • Oakeshott And Marx & Engels: A Comparative Analysis

Oakeshott And Marx & Engels: A Comparative Analysis

Decent Essays
Show More
The desire to create change in society resulted in the development of most political ideologies. As a competing blueprint, each political ideology prescribes how society should be organized, and the appropriate way of achieving such goal. Thus, political ideologies are mutually exclusive. Conservatives and socialists differ on their understanding of human nature and freedom. Therefore, it is appropriate to look at the works of the leading philosophers on where the conflicting ideologies differ and overlap. While Oakeshott, and Marx & Engels both reach the conclusion that if innovation is to take place in a society, it must be beneficial as a whole. However. Both philosophers differ on their role of government.
Conservatism is an ideology grounded on preserving the present or status quo in society. Thus, Michael Oakeshott is critical of the idea of change and innovation (2014: 168). However, socialists embrace change and innovation in order to produce the perfect society. The argument is that due to the oppression of the working class by the bourgeois, the working class will rise up, and revolt to create a classless society (Marx & Engels, 2014: 212-223). Oakeshott, and Marx& Engels although at the opposing side of the ideological …show more content…
Although, deriving at a communist society is a vision of the perfect society for Marx & Engels, the Proletariat revolution is to redress the disequilibrium generated in society. The bourgeoisie who owns the means of production antagonizes workers. The propertyless proletariats are also subjected to the laws, morality and religion that protects and advance the interests of the bourgeoisies in society (Marx &Engels, 2014: 217). Marx & Engels are looking to redress the disequilibrium in the capitalist society by creating a perfect society that is classless with the equality of

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Karl Marx's Philosophy
    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Karl Marx's Philosophy

    Marx argues that economic structure creates the superstructure and that material relations determine consciousness. However he neglects the weight which ideas bear upon human consciousness. The bedrock of the bourgeois’ hegemony of exploitation exists in the realm of ideas. From ideas, cultural, political, and economic modes of legitimization entrench the domination of one class over another. For Gramsci, consent is of utmost importance and in order to persuade the working class and the bourgeois itself, philosophy and eloquence must be used to the fullest.…

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Alienation In The Communist Manifesto
    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Alienation In The Communist Manifesto

    In The Communist Manifesto, the oppression of the Bourgeoisie upon the proletariats results in their dehumanization. Through the exploitation of labour the proletariats diminish into a way of life that does not allow them to mindfully explore their own humanity. Proletariats will initially crave their own humanity as a means to overcome the Bourgeoisie oppression. The primary drive of a proletariat revolt lies within their need for humanization within their own self-connection and connection to each other. Labourers are alienated from craftsmanship through factory work, and thus lack in pure self-sufficiency.…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Marx Theory Of Reification Analysis
    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Marx Theory Of Reification Analysis

    Further, he argues that this consciousness which is situated in proletariat is due to historical circumstances. Referring to Marx’s historical dialects, he states that that, “consciousness is nothing but the expression of historical necessity” (Lukács 1923). This historical necessity of consciousness compels the proletariat to realize the contradictions and irrationality of a given capitalist society. As the proletariat becomes aware of this irrationality, it will seek to transform society as a communist state. Further, borrowing from the Master-Slave dialectic, Lukács argues that the proletariat has more power to end reification while the bourgeoise might even intensify it.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Comparing Mises And The Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx
    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Comparing Mises And The Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx

    Marx says that the interests of communists are the same as the interests of the proletariat. The primary idea of communists the revolutionary proletariat and the communist is abolition of private property, for that is the reason that keeps them enslaved. Bourgeois capitalism theory is that the owners of the means of production only pay the workers enough to ensure that they will be healthy and reproduce more children who will end up working for the factory. The formation of bourgeois property relies on its unequal distribution of wealth to the proletariat. If the proletariat decides it wants to free itself from bourgeois oppression, then their goal must be to abolish capitalism.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Marx And Engels Analysis
    • 1310 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Marx And Engels Analysis

    Marx’s belief in the political economy as an evil, in the tying together of the politic and the monetary is inherently anti-capitalist; capitalism being a system which demands structure, division and to Marx and Engels’ derision, commodification of the self. M.C. Howard and J.E. King in The Political Economy of Marx, reinforce the prevalent idea in Marx and Engels’ commentary that there is a connection between product relations and class relations. The worker is the product, a disposable one, and as Howard and King suggest, a thing there is liable to be a surplus of, like any product.…

    • 1310 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx And Weber Comparison
    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Karl Marx And Weber Comparison

    Marx and Engels observed conflict as normal and liberal fixed in social institutions and expressed by self-conscious classes. Durkheim considered that conflict was atypical and potentially hazardous when expressed by estranged members, indicating social inefficiency and moral crisis. Weber asserted that conflict was not unusual and that the conflict amongst interest groups may cause a social movement. Marx and Engels believed that change was normal and progressive and rooted in contradictions within social institutions occurring rapidly in violent revolution. On the subject of alienation, Marx and Engels proposed that in a capitalist society there was alienation from human potential and productive activity based on system of exploitation which ultimately produced and led to class struggle.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx Hypocrisy
    • 2141 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Karl Marx Hypocrisy

    For Marx, property is the source of class distinction and, therefore, inequality in society (Marx, 162). Due to Marx's belief in DM, he urges the proletariat to hastily "sweep away by force the old conditions of production" and thereby "sweep away the conditions for the existence of class antagonisms" (Marx, 176). Only once the proletariat have lead their revolution against the modern bourgeoisie can true freedom and equality be achieved. They must serve as the antithesis to the bourgeoisie thesis, resulting in the final Communist synthesis. Marx's prescription for society's woes fundamentally differs from that of the ET; the linear progress of enlightenment, aided and abetted by reason, is abandoned for the looping roller-coaster of DM3.…

    • 2141 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx: The Father Of Communism
    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Karl Marx: The Father Of Communism

    He argued that production forces people to exchange good and services, not individuals. Economic relations are beyond the individual in the sense that they grow and change separate to the interconnections of individuals, And these relationships have power over the individual. Individuals aren’t independents, they just appear so when separated from society. But, as Marx states, they can’t be separated from society because in capitalism, social classes shaped the individual and how they interacted with production and each other. Much like liberal democracy, Marx believed that individual rights were harmful to the proletariat because they favored the landowning bourgeoisie over the proletariat.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx And Miss Julie Relationship
    • 1814 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Karl Marx And Miss Julie Relationship

    During this time, the elite: the rich, property owners, aristocrats were thought to be superior to the masses. This is exactly, the kind of society that philosopher, Karl Marx detested. Marx supported the lower class: the common people, the servants, the masses and believed that the masses untimely had the potential to rise above the oppressors if they would only realize their true power in numbers and could demolish the need for government and create true equality among all people. Social stratification and capitalism dictate the social norms of the time, but the human spirit often strives to be in control of its own destiny. In Miss Julie, money and social class draw a rigid line that Strindberg’s characters Julie and Jean try to rebut against but yet fail to escape its’ grips on their inner…

    • 1814 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Emile Durkheim And Max Weber Analysis
    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Emile Durkheim And Max Weber Analysis

    Karl Marx believed that in order to have a state of Eden, meaning everything peaceful and equal, then the working class (proletariat class) ought to unite and fight against the Bourgeoisie. Thus the first task would be to obtain control of the means of production. Means of Production was divided into two categories; sources of production which were the workers, and the forces of production which referred to the technology used in order to create an item. Although here the contradiction is that Marx belonged to the Bourgeois class, he believed that the proletariat class needed allies to support the movement against the plutocracy and its government. One of the main reasons for attacking the means of production, is that since the ruling ideas prevail through the means of production, then by attacking, the superstructure would become weak.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2023 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  CA Privacy Policy |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings