Virtue And Ethical Analysis

Decent Essays
Assignment Application
Virtue Ethics and Ethical Egoism
Wk2RobinsonK
03/12/2017
Using the Ethical Analysis Tool, this paper will review the moral justification in using the ring of Gyges for my own benefit from a virtue ethicist’s position. It will also explain if a virtual ethicist and an ethical egoist take the same situation. Virtue ethics is defined as the virtue of a person in doing one’s duty or acting in a way to bring about good consequences. A virtuous person can be described as one with typical character traits always questioning proper social and family values and who is kind simply because that is their character and not because they look to gain something from it. Most noble act in virtuous ways resulting from their instincts or their own rational thought.
…show more content…
A person's character is made up of traits. Some of those traits are virtues, and others are vices. Ethical egoism is defined as people having moral obligations only to themselves. Ethical egoism is when one thinks their importance is greater over other in spite of the fact they are no different from the other(s) and therefore this claim cannot be justified.
About the ring of Gyges, Glaucon (Plato’s brother) asks if a man can be virtuous enough that he can fight off the temptation of stealing. According to the text, if someone obtains the power of invisibility, and never doing anything wrong, he is considered an idiot (Plato. (n.d.). The Republic, 2012). As a virtual ethicist, I ask myself if the theft of the money is justifiable. And to me, yes it is. Taking property not belonging to me is never justified, but in some

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Ring of Gyges, introduced in Book II of Plato’s The Republic by Glaucon, is a magical artifact that enables the bearer to turn themselves invisible at will. While not founded in historical fact; the scenario is rather a thought experiment used to explore the fundamental nature of human morality when the bearer faces no retribution for their actions. Glaucon alleges that the temptation provided by the ring is irresistible by any man, and that without consequences the bearer would disregard morality in favour of his own self-gain. However, this argument is not without criticism: Socrates provides his own counterargument in which he uses the ideal of rationality as a means to avoid the temptation of Gyges’ ring. Furthermore, Glaucon ignores the role of environment, upbringing, and circumstance in his thought experiment ― without which no one is inherently malicious.…

    • 1119 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay I will argue that in Plato’s Republic, Socrates shows the Ring of Gyges teaches us that morality would disappear if there were no consequences to the actions taken by the one who possessed the ring. First, I will explain what he means by morality would disappear. Then I will show why I feel morality would not disappear. Finally, I will conclude that morality will not disappear.…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the medical field, there are many tricky ethical situations in which the correct moral decision a physician should make in regards to a patient may not be clear. An example of this is a physician deciding to tell the family of a young boy who is dying and needs a kidney transplant that his father is a direct tissue match despite the father’s requests to not share this information with the family. Ethicists of the three branches of bioethics: Kantian, utilitarian, and virtue would all have distinct views on the morally correct decision that this physician should make. Kantian ethicists would believe that it is wrong for the physician to hold this information from the family, but there would be some disagreement between Kanitans on whether the doctor should recommend that the father serve as an organ donor for his son in the first place. A Kantian would apply the universalizability law to test the morality of…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ring of Gyges grants the ability to become invisible by only “turn[ing] the collet of the ring.” This, for Gyges, gave him power and confidence to conquer the kingdom. I’ve often thought about this situation but a different light. The question If you could have any superpower what would it be? My selection has always been to have the ability to be invisible, but not for the reason that Gyges would want.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A known terrorist has been captured, and the threat of an attack on American soil is possible. As a utilitarian should security forces torture the terrorist to get him to reveal the details of the attack? I believe as utilitarian yes go ahead and torture him. Make his life awful and unbearable so that he understands the pain he is attempting to unfold on American civilians. Then he may realize that his actions are bad and he will give up the details.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As previously stated, a virtuous person wants to live a life filled with happiness a life that will make them grow into being a good person, or at least with the idea that they themselves are a good person. The same goes for an ethical…

    • 1690 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Just And Unjust Analysis

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Questioning a person’s actions is common within the world of humans. A person may be just or unjust, and some may be both. The Ring of Gyges goes into depth about the just and unjust theory in humans. People’s actions explain a view that many are familiar with. The passage explains how people want personal gain.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Virtue ethics, a theory created by Aristotle used to make moral decisions. His theory solely relied on individualism, not society, culture or religion. His theory was introduced in ancient Greek times. For Aristotle one should be able to do good without mere pleasure or political since it would be superficial. Virtue ethics is more concerned with how one should live.…

    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Virtue ethics starts with the question, “What makes for a good, or excellent, person?” They answer the question by arguing that being a good person is about having a good character. A character is a set of dispositions and those who have a good character are naturally disposed to do good things. It is believed that those with good characters are “virtuous” and that good character traits are virtues, while bad character traits are vices. According to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, a virtue is a good and moral quality (2013).…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle Virtue Analysis

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Aristotle explains the concept of virtue has a concept that can be cultivated through habits. He clearly states that virtue does not come from some predetermine system in each human being, but instead an empty void that gets filled over time. He argues his understanding of a virtue of character as a medial condition between vices, which means there is a balance between two parts of a spectrum. Aristotle uses examples such as a person deciding to be harpist or a builder. He states that the person does is not born with those abilities, but instead cultivates them through repetition also known as habits.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Nicole, I like how you defined what virtue means to you but also explained that because everyone is different everyone's definition of virtue is different. I also believe that virtue should be "good", but what one describes as good could be very different from someone else's definition. This definition may also depend on the situation. You connected these differences very well by sharing what causes people to have different definitions of virtue such as "societal norms, different regions, and different…

    • 81 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Following this period, virtue ethics were consistently questioned, compared, and contrasted with increasing disagreement from both the theories of deontology and utilitarianism. Neither, focused on the tradition that virtue ethics does, they consisted of the virtues themselves, motives and moral compass, moral education, moral knowledge, personal relationships, the notion of happiness, and lastly the concept of character. For example, one might ponder whom they want to be known as, and what standard do I go about achieving this goal. What will this person’s legacy be concerning which morals are embraced and lived by?…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    the stance of the company and Luke’s coworkers. The reason behind my recommendation is that by using the categorical imperative from the view of the company and its stakeholders Luke can ensure that the inevitable damage that would have otherwise occurred would not actually occur. At the present time there is no proof that Owen would actually suffer a loss if Luke doesn’t tell Owen about the future decline in property values. Thus, from the information that is currently known, it is best to go with the categorical imperative from the company’s point of view.…

    • 1449 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most forms of ethics take virtues into consideration either directly or indirectly, but the big separating factor for virtue ethics is the centralization of a person’s character. Mitchell defines virtue ethics as, “an ethical theory that uses as a moral standard what a virtuous person would do, rather than consequences or obligations; the primary question is, What kind of person should I be?” People put into a specific situation are considered to act because of their virtues and habits of character, with no consideration to how it will ultimately benefit a society or serve a greater cause. This can be seen when people act to protect or save someone, before they even have time to consider anything about the situation, they simply follow an impulse due to the character they have previously developed. Confucius did not believe someone was born as the person that they would be, and instead favored an upbringing that continued into adulthood, that highly favors…

    • 2231 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The theory of ethical egoism would say “The morally right act, for any particular situation, is the act that will produce the greatest amount of utility for oneself” as quoted from the book Ethical Choices (Burnor & Raley, 2013 pg.100). Ethical egoism would also make the argument that the theory is not as selfish as it may seem there is nothing that prohibits someone from helping another person out, as long as the action produces utility for the person that is completing the action (Burnor & Raley, 2013 pg.100). According to ethical egoism their theory shows a great deal of selflessness and focuses on what most people would consider morally acceptable. Ethical egoists claim that their theory is selfless because we can still help people as long as the action supports our own interest. Kant has an idea that the morally correct action is the thought of moral duty.…

    • 1310 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays