The Pros And Cons Of Aristotle's Virtue Ethics

Improved Essays
Virtue ethics, a theory created by Aristotle used to make moral decisions. His theory solely relied on individualism, not society, culture or religion. His theory was introduced in ancient Greek times. For Aristotle one should be able to do good without mere pleasure or political since it would be superficial. Virtue ethics is more concerned with how one should live. The question someone might ask when following Virtue of ethics is, " What person should I become" not "what should I do?" These questions do more with the true character and nature of someone rather than, someone basing their actions on right or wrong. Virtue ethics is how a person can become an exceptional person. Aristotle said that those who lived this life would live virtuous, …show more content…
Virtues ethics are based off of people as individuals not as whole groups. It does not solve any questions in ethical crisis. For example, the government cannot base their decisions off of what they feel and think, they have to be able to make the best decision for a better outcome for a group of people. This would not follow ethic virtue because what would be correct in virtue ethics is not correct for the government. It also cannot be applied in all situations. For example, a person cannot be coward fighting in a war just because they are outnumbered. He has to have courage and keep going. The only problem with this is that you have to be both courageous and a coward, so how can you be both if your life and your troops life 's depend on you. Another reason, virtue ethics might fail is because your virtues might be different in comparison to other people. An example for this would be people who live in Israel. They might believe that bombing people is the correct thing we do while we oppose that idea. We cannot be thought virtue 's ways for everyone because people have different …show more content…
We can have ethical decisions by not judging people based off their traditions or religions. This might help keep society together. A person might argue that their moral code is better than another, but this would only destroy the peace between society. They need to be able to set the morals aside, with out any morals, every one would think their ideas are right and everyone else is wrong. With moral codes it is much easier to relate to some people. Virtue Ethics can simply help us because becoming a better person as individual and have a positive impact on our lives. Hopefully one person at time can make a large group of virtuous people, it is said this could not happen but with faith maybe someday it could happen. People need to stop being selfish and start to care about other people. Once people truly stop being selfish and fully understand the virtues of ethics they can they make ethical

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    He also argues that a completely ethical person will not be conflicted about his ethical choice, opposite of Kant, who thinks that a person can make an ethical choice while desiring the wrong alternative. In fact, he prefers that, because it shows that the person is doing his duty, not the action just because it makes him happy. Kant might defend himself by saying that it would be too easy for a person to succumb to selfish desires if he is gaining happiness from his virtuous acts, and any action is not moral if there are any external motivators, but I will show how this defense fails near the end of the paper. Kant and Aristotle have very different opinions on what makes a person virtuous and what defines a virtuous act. My thoughts on morality line up more with Aristotle’s.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are mild flaws in Aristotle’s arguments. Aristotle is somewhat ambiguous, particularly the characterization of individuals. Aristotle does not adequately address intrinsic motivations for action. Individuals should be more concerned for the betterment of others, not driven by a reason of the generosity virtue. Dedication to virtue could eventually lead to pride and hubris, and would not produce benefits for individuals or societies.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Epicurus believed the community should not harm another to achieve pleasure. Also, Epicurus based his ethics from Aristotle’s teaching that the “highest good is what is valued for its own sake, and not for the sake of anything else”. He also agrees with Aristotle that happiness is the highest good. Although Epicurus based some of his beliefs on Aristotle’s beliefs, Epicurus’ beliefs are different and…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I argue virtue in Nicomachean Ethics does not focus on the individual as a subjective being, and that the call for subjective individuals to characterize their life around objective, universal virtue implies individuals should seek to be beyond themselves. Aristotle holds the position that for humans to develop their nature – toward reason, toward moral virtue – they must engage socially, politically, and culturally. The cultivation of practical wisdom as not blind habituation, but a developed and reflective disposition to the morally virtuous, seems to imply a human being freed from dependent habit and, thus, finally autonomous. However, I argue against this inference, that individuals characterized by Nicomachean Ethics are not of free will and it is their own human nature that determines choice. Choice, to Aristotle, is not possible without pre-existing dispositions that deliberate; choices are external manifestations of disposition.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Virtue Ethics

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Virtual ethics is a method that focuses on the agent, not the action. This theory doesn’t tell one how to act, rather it tells us what sort of person one should be. Developed by the Greek philosopher Aristotle, virtue ethics centers its ideals on the central theme of character. The heart of virtue ethics is the search for Eudaimonia, which is roughly translated to the words happiness or flourishing. These are the types of traits that come from a particular type of character, something within us, not from external rewards or pleasure.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle’s ethics are virtue ethics. This view states that in order to be moral, one must do as the just man would do and for the same reasons. Aristotle states that morality cannot be learned but it is innate and is a skill that must be sharpened with practice. Aristotle defends this view by saying that there is no clear-cut ethics. Everything should be taken on a case-by-case basis and by using the model of the moral man one is able to do this.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If virtue is dependent on our character, it can demonstrate itself through habit. For Aristotle, if people gain good habits of character, their decisions can be more reasonable. Therefore, in time, habits can be changed by the agent. For example, if a non-virtuous man changes his character and becomes a virtuous man he can achieve the best life. This means that people can be virtuous by making an effort.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical egoism varies from other ethical positions since it proposes that the enthusiasm of others anything to never be an element in good choice making. An ethical egoist accepts that helping others is not an ethical activity and that they anything to help other people just seeing that it would offer an advantage over the long haul. If it does not better me I “morally” do not have to do it. So, if killing, torturing, or robbing someone will help me better myself then morally right. The book claims that ethical egoism cannot be true because it requires killing rape, or theft just because actions of this promote self- interest.…

    • 1259 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    1. Wolf thinks one should not aim to be as morally good as possible because one does not pursue non-moral virtues and is not well-rounded. To be a moral saint, one lives by their moral virtues at the cost of not cultivating any non-moral virtues. A moral saint is one who acts as morally good as possible. In order to be a moral saint, one permits all moral virtues and inhibits non-moral virtues.…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle also considers the best good. This is that which is desired only for its’ own sake, and for the sake of which all other ends are desired (Kemerling). However, the good of humans cannot be determined through an exact science since this process begins with general principles and forms conclusions. From an ethical standpoint, to evaluate what is good, we must begin with moral judgements before general principles can be reached. Happiness, Aristotle argues, is a complete and sufficient good (Aristotle 's Ethics).…

    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics