Consequentialism Of Virtue Ethics Analysis

Improved Essays
Virtue ethics is defined as a moral theory that puts an emphasis on virtue making it the central concern. Virtual ethics defines the character of man as to what exactly is morally correct or incorrect. In Lewis Vaughn’s “Doing Ethics” (P.139) he states that “a virtuous person would do or what moral exemplars such as Jesus or Buddha would do.” He also goes on to state that a virtuous person often is someone who chooses to live the good life, flourishes and chooses happiness (P.139). A virtuous ethical actions and response to a certain situation always leads back to their morals and who they are on the inside. It leads me to believe that someone who chooses to live their lives by being virtually ethic would question themselves “What would Jesus …show more content…
However, your morals and virtues are what lead you to make that decision and ultimately the consequences that came with the decision not only affected you but everyone around you. The next reason why I believe virtue ethics to be more consequentialist than non-consequentialist is because the characteristics between a person who has virtue ethics has ethical egoism. According to Vaughn (P. 70) “the morally right action is the one that produces the most favorable balance of good over for oneself. The decision that somebody makes when dealing with different circumstances leads them to make decisions that will make them feel and look good in front of people. Someone with the mentality of an ethical egotist will think first about the consequences about the decision that they are about to make. As previously stated, a virtuous person wants to live a life filled with happiness a life that will make them grow into being a good person, or at least with the idea that they themselves are a good person. The same goes for an ethical …show more content…
Compared to a consequentialist with virtue ethics, we can see some difference between the two. Someone with virtue ethics thinks about the consequences and chooses to pursue happiness over sadness. They question what the consequences will be and question how someone else would take into account the situation that they are in. Their morals are what count here, if the decision that they make help their morals then what they was good. Someone who is non-consequentialist who goes by the natural law theory, or the divine command theory, would make a decision that may not directly affect their morals, and may not maximize happiness does compared to someone who has virtue ethics. For this same reason is why I believe virtue ethics to be a form of consequentialism, more closely to utilitarianism because they seek to maximize good over evil as well as

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    However, I would agree with the virtue ethicists more because a good person would obviously possess a good character. In order to be truly good, a person must live a good life by adhering to their personal values and values that are commonly known to be virtues. When determining who is good and who is not good, you without a doubt, have to look at that person’s character. A person with good values is in turn, a good person and a person with bad values is, in a bad…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pleasure is given to those who have created an ethical decision and sometimes ethical decisions can be painful as well. It can be in a form of sacrifice that will give someone else pleasure, but not yourself. Morality is a theory of doing something “right” and respected to the law. When making ethical decisions, we should be thinking of making decisions that work with the law and not against it. That can be pleasure in itself.…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While it is taken into consideration for a consequentialist, in Deontology it would be considered more important to focus on the person’s intention to do the right thing rather than their concern with the results. This is the most ethical way to make any decision, with the primary concern being to follow what moral and societal rules deem as the right thing to do. When a choice is made because the person understands that it is their duty to do what's right, it is much more honourable than when they do something because it will result in a good consequence. From a consequentialist’s perspective, “consequences can conceivably justify any kind of act, for it does not matter how harmful it is to some so long as it is more beneficial to others.” Utilitarianism is an example of extremely consequentialist viewpoints because it is focussed entirely on identifying which path will result in the outcome of maximum pleasure for the highest number of people. Although it could hypothetically be ideal to live in a society where the only concern is the happiness of its people, it is not realistic or moral to run a life based solely on doing what will result in the most pleasure for the most people.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By emphasizing the importance of character traits, Aristotle gives humans credit that they can be good people performing activities because of their character not just because of rules they ought to follow. The only weak point in the theory is the reliance on virtue being essential to happiness. It fails to consider that everyone is different, unlike character traits/moral virtues which can vary from person to person or culture to culture. If the ethics of virtue applied all of its components more universally, realizing that everyone is different and that some virtuous people are not happy and some non-virtuous people are, it would make a more sound…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The assumption is that if we follow a set of rules that give us the best consequences our actions will result in the greater good for everyone around us. Some strengths of utilitarianism include the importance of happiness, consideration of the greater good, and relevance of intention. Meanwhile, Some disadvantages of utilitarianism are that it is not the only thing of value and the end doesn't justify the means. Mill and Kant have opposite views points, Kant thinks people can decide what is moral through reason alone and Mill thinks that through experience people can determine what is good or evil based on pleasure and…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This account of moral knowledge differs from other accounts given because of the way it views morality and what it deems as morally right. Consequentialism said that morality of an action depend on its results. If good came out of the action, despite the fact that the fact may be questionable, then what the person has done is morally right. Kant’s duty based ethics view said that morality was based on intentions that were universalizability. Virtue ethics deems that morality is gained through experience, training, and…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Intrinsic goodness are things that are worthwhile because there are good in themselves that are not good because they lead to other good things. Same thing with things that are intrinsically bad, they are bad in themselves not because they lead to other bad things. When trying to decide what action to do, actual consequence generic act utilitarians believe that we should do the thing or side with the thing that is the most morally right, we should do the thing that will bring us the most happiness/pleasure or the least amount of unhappiness with the least amount of consequences. They believe that we should do whatever is the most morally right thing to…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Perseverance Definition

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Before perseverance can be described as a virtue, the idea of a virtue must be defined. Virtues deal with what is good and what is bad. A virtuous person follows society’s standards for what is good. This person exhibits behavior according to what is morally correct. And since virtuous people do virtuous actions it can be deduced that a virtue is a pattern of behavior that reflects moral character.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He says, “The greatest happiness principle, holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness” (Mill 52). Mill’s utilitarian ethical theory rely majorly on the self-interest rather performing an act as a duty. An ethical theory should have a reason justified for performing a specific act. The ability of an act to yield maximum happiness should not be used to determine whether the act is moral or immoral. It involves assessing what the people perceive to be moral and taking actions which will produce insignificant consequences on the people other than the individual performing the act.…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is for our soul to have life and for it to be filled with happiness. It’s an active life that has it with rational principals. Going back to Kant, and him talking about good will, to me basically with having good will I could be laying down and not doing anything, but to contain me still having good will. Kant went logically wrong about his view on good because to him, the human well-being “happiness are two different independent point of views. Kant’s ethical goal is about following the principals, he believed there was a supreme principal for morality and referred it to the categorical Imperative, which were imperative, hypothetical, and categorical imperatives.…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays