• Home Page
  • Consequentialism And Non-Conseucinationlism Analysis

Consequentialism And Non-Conseucinationlism Analysis

Decent Essays
Show More
Consequentialism and non-consequntionlism are ethical theories that deal with the right and wrong of the actions. Consequentalist judges action based on the consequences the actions have. Non-consequetionlism judges actions on the intrinsic value not its consequences. When dealing with issues such as lying its more appropriate to look at It from a non-cosnequtiolist perspective.

Consequtionlism views that all morality is, is producing the best consequences. Consequtionlism views that of all the things a person could be doing the morally right one would be the one with the best overall consequences. With lying conseuqtionlism looks out the outcomes a lie produces not the intentions of it. So if you lied about cheating on your significant

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Consequentialism: Differences Between Activity And Outcomes
    • 93 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Consequentialism: Differences Between Activity And Outcomes

    In consequentialism the "outcomes" of an activity are everything the activity achieves, including the activity itself. In consequentialism, the "outcomes" of an activity incorporate (a) the activity itself, and (b) everything the activity causes. What then, do these two sorts of result have in like manner, that makes them both "outcomes"? On the off chance that there is an answer, maybe it is something like this: both An itself and the things A reasons are things that happen on the off chance that you do An instead of the distinct options for…

    • 93 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    The Rutland Model: The Consequentialist And Deontological Approach
    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Rutland Model: The Consequentialist And Deontological Approach

    The Rutland model studies a dilemma from three different points of view: the consequentialist approach, which considers results; the deontological approach, which focuses on personal rights; and the aspirational approach, which considers the person whom is making the decision and who they want to be. Consequentialist Approach. The consequentialist approach, also known as Utilitarianism, studies the consequences of an outcome and considers “the greatest good for the greatest number of people without causing harm” (Ethical Toolkit, n.d.). By evaluating the overall happiness level created in response to each option will help determine which course of action to take.…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    John Stuart Mill's 'Utilitarianism'
    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages

    John Stuart Mill's 'Utilitarianism'

    In John Stuart Mill’s influential book “Utilitarianism”, Mill introduces the belief that moral action is based upon the concept of utility, or how he explains it, the greatest happiness principle. It is this greatest happiness principle that defines Utilitarianism as the notion that the best moral actions are those that promote the most amount of human happiness. Actions that would be regarded as the least favorable are those that promote the opposite, unhappiness. The concept of Utilitarianism and that of Consequentialism are similar as both judge the moral value of an action dependent on its consequences, however each claim leads to different conclusions.…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Prima Facie Immigrates
    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Prima Facie Immigrates

    The second term that I will bring up while discussing this topic is consequentialism. The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines this term as, “the theory that the value and especially the moral value of an act should be judged by the value of its consequences.” I feel that the rest of the terms or phrases that I will use in this paper are going to be simple enough that they do not need any…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Criminal Justice Proposal Essay
    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Criminal Justice Proposal Essay

    According to Consequentialism only the consequences of the proposal can help us determine what is good for the people while Deontology can better be used when it comes to the rights of the people and determining what is good or right like we seen in the criminal justice…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Normative Ethics: Consequentialism Vs. Kantianism
    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Normative Ethics: Consequentialism Vs. Kantianism

    To fully understand how normative principles, justify morality, they must be broken down. We will begin with consequentialism, which is a future-oriented family of theories. Consequentialism states that actions are morally right just because…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Ethical Theory Of Abortion: The Consequences Of Morality
    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Ethical Theory Of Abortion: The Consequences Of Morality

    According to the theory, the only thing that matters is whether or not the abortion will produce more or less general value. However, it is not clear whether the consequentialists would support or deny abortion. It is evident that, whenever the carrying out of abortion provides the greatest good, they will support the idea. On the other hand, if abortion does not bring the greatest goodness,…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Difference Between Moral Realism And Moral Relativism
    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Difference Between Moral Realism And Moral Relativism

    There are many different types of beliefs or the way people choose to judge a statement but the main two that stood out in class was moral realism and moral relativism. It took me a couple times and different ways of reading about the two types to grasp a basic understanding. These are basically two different types of views but they do have similar ideas within them. Before someone can determine which viewpoint makes the most sense, you must grasp a basic understanding of the two. After getting a fundamental understanding you will then be able to determine which view makes the most sense.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Consequentialist Theory Of Euthanasia
    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Consequentialist Theory Of Euthanasia

    In this paper, we are going to present an analysis regarding medical ethics, specifically Euthanasia and we will try to describe the position of a Consequentialist, Deontologist, and Virtue ethics philosophers and what their decision will be in reference to this dilemma. Subsequently we will compare and choose which position is the most appropriate to handle this ethical dilemma and explain why the others positions do not work. We will do our best to present enough evidence to support the reasoning behind our selection. Anything that involves a decision about ending a person’s life regardless of the circumstances, presents ethical dilemmas on how or why this can be done or even worse accepted.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Essay On Meta Ethical Theory
    • 1990 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Essay On Meta Ethical Theory

    How should we think about ethics? In order to answer this ultimate question, we must first understand the crucial concepts of ethics, but before we look into the concepts, it is essential to state the basic definition of ethic because the word “ethics” is the basis of the question. In our society, ethics is commonly defined as the study of morals, which are the standards of right and wrong that show humans what to do. Knowing this, we can continue with the concepts of ethics. First of all, we have to understand how knowledge about ethics is gained.…

    • 1990 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Consequentialism Vs Deontology Essay
    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Consequentialism Vs Deontology Essay

    Consequentialism and deontology are contrasting theories of philosophy that guide us in viewing acts in terms of their morality. The doctrine of consequentialism suggests we should judge the morality of actions purely on the results they produce; whereas deontology aims to judge morality based on the conduct of an individual, and morality is decided from the moral acceptance of a particular action rather than the result the decision produces. These principles of philosophy have existed for thousands of years, with many philosophers throughout history using them as a basis for their work. In the context of an ethical situation, we can thoroughly use these ideologies as instruments to determine an effective solution to prevent a harmful dilemma;…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Endangered Species Ethics Essay
    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Endangered Species Ethics Essay

    Consequentialism is the ethical theory that makes the moral decision of whether something is good or not based on the consequences that come from said action. With consequentialism being a sort of umbrella term, underneath it includes other ethical theories such as utilitarianism, altruism, egoism, and negative…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant And Deontological Ethics Essay
    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Immanuel Kant And Deontological Ethics Essay

    The defining feature of deontological ethics is that it decides whether an action is moral or immoral without considering anything else. For example, Kant argues that lying is never under any circumstances acceptable, no matter what the situation, as we cannot will for lying to be a universal maxim. Whereas the consequentialist view is of the opposite opinion that it is our consequences that hold moral value, not our actions. Concequentialists believe in the theory of “the greater good” and therefore aim to make the most people the most happy they can in society, Because of this, they take the view that telling a lie in some instances is acceptable if it goes on to produce good consequences later on. This seems like an ideal theory if we could actually pre determine the outcome of our actions, but we have little or no control in the real world over how our actions turn out.…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Utilitarianism And Consequentialism In Nigeria
    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Utilitarianism And Consequentialism In Nigeria

    Utilitarianism is a feature of consequentialism, which tells that the results of action are the only benchmark. The consequentialism can be differentiated with virtue ethics which holds virtue as a moral good. Utilitarianism proponents have been broken about whether individual acts should conform to utility. Whether utility should be calculated as aggregate or average must be…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of The Minimum Conception Of Morality
    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Analysis Of The Minimum Conception Of Morality

    In class and in The Elements of Moral Philosophy by James & Stuart Rachels, I learned about the Minimum Conception of Morality (MCM). There are two key elements which make up the Minimum Conception of Morality. The first part states the moral judgments must always have good reasons for the decision. This often is confused with what they feel and not actually facts. The second part is that morality must always be impartial, and take all stakeholders into consideration without being bias.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings