Vietnam A Necessary War Analysis

Improved Essays
Vietnam, a Necessary War? The Vietnam War is very controversial in the sense that people disagree over whether America should have entered or not. Two people who capture the feelings of both sides well are Michael Lind who wrote “A Necessary War” and Fredrik Logevall who wrote “An Avoidable Catastrophe”. Both of these works represent either side of the controversy of entering the war. Lind appeal to the audience through rebuttals and perspective of the time, while Logevall seems to just knock all of the points made to go to war and staying at war aside, offering little sympathy for President Lyndon Johnson, and other American leaders at the time. Both views have strong arguments for them, but which is more appealing? Michael Lind and his “A Necessary War” support the American entrance into the war. Lind offers a view of sympathy towards the leaders and their decisions at …show more content…
Logevall claims that committing to war in Vietnam was a terrible mistake. Logevall begins by showing some sympathy to President Lyndon Johnson and other leaders at the time, as they believed that the strategies they had would work. He then goes on to state that “vocal proponents of taking the war to North Vietnam were strikingly few in number”4. He states this to show the overwhelming rejection of support to go to Vietnam by many American leaders of the time, other than Johnson. Logevall also suggests that even other countries were skeptical of being able to win in a long-term battle with the Viet Cong. Logevall also claims that some of the allies of America refrained from stopping America. “while the French government of Charles de Gaulle forcefully disputed the administration 's position at every turn, the more important ally refrained from doing so.”5 He believes that if other allies had spoken up the war could have been avoidable. Logevall offers some other evidence, but these are his main

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The year 1965 constituted a huge turning point in US history, under Johnson’s administration the decision was made to deploy US troops to a deteriorating situation in Vietnam. The debate surrounds Johnson, and whether he had choice to make his own decision. Vandemark and Cuddy present the argument that pressure felt from the public and the lack of a popular mandate left Johnson with constrained choice. However, this is countered through the lack of supporting evidence and the stance taken by Halberstam, Logevall and McMaster, historians who all demonstrate the argument that although Johnson felt it was vital to stop the spread of communism, there was a vast range of choices that Johnson could have taken without committing to ground troops.…

    • 1921 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Then the troops were treated horribly after getting back. Why would the U.S. send troops into a sensless, unwinable war? Even though the Vietnam War tried to stop communism, many thought it was a pointlesss war. There 's reasons why U.S. should be out of the Vietnam. One reason is that the involvement of U.S. helped Minh (the leader of the communist North), the opportunity say that the South was a pupput by letting us into theith sacred land.…

    • 2246 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fred Fleitz Analysis

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Also his failed program to train Syrian rebels left and opportunity for Russia and Iran to step up. Fleitz views this as a huge weakness leaving those small deployments vulnerable for capture with no back up and an embarrassment to American credibility. The Obama administration 's actions are passive and have a peace keeping effort driving it but from a realist point of view, they are viewed as spineless and exploitable. Fleitz believes that war is unavoidable and America needs to show their strength in the Middle East so the war is not brought overseas because peace is unachievable. Fleitz also comments on Middle East allies shifting because of Obama 's “non-policy”.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Tet Offensive led them to realize that they were receiving false information from government officials. This incident decreased support for the Vietnamese war efforts as a whole. The media took advantage of these discrepancies and began televising the cruel actions displayed by South Vietnamese leaders, which continued to lessen American support for the presence of troops in the region. Although the Tet Offensive wasn’t necessarily a success for the Vietcong, the effort was a strategic victory. If their efforts could convince the US to leave the region in order to please the citizens of their country, then they would be able to defeat the South Vietnamese government.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He told his audience “[the Vietnam War] had exposed the hypocrisy of American policy and the emptiness of Johnson’s solemn words about freedom and democracy.” Potter pointed out, for example, that the United States talked about defending freedom in Vietnam but Diem, an oppressive dictator, was placed into power. From this speech, it is clear that Potter (and other New Left protesters) did not think the war was accomplishing any good and was even making the situation in Vietnam worse. In American since the end of World War 2, was a general trend towards a larger role for the government in domestic and foreign affairs. However, that does not mean that Americans…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Vietnam War was fought from November 1, 1955 to April 30, 1975 between North Vietnam and South Vietnam. The U.S. supported South Vietnam because it was democratic. In addition, the U.S. wanted to prevent the spread of communism. The involvement of the United States in the Vietnam War has been a very controversial topic over the years. Some Americans believed that it was our duty to defend against the spread of communism while other Americans believed that it was an unnecessary war and it was not out job to get involved and it was a costly blunder.…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As the war in Vietnam waged on the American public began to realise that the ideologies they had been told about were actually propaganda vehicles that American used to assert their global hegemony. The Domino Theory (first mentioned by President Eisenhower in 1954), the public slowly learned, was completely untrue and there was no actual basis for it. The theory merely came from a few scared men intent on defending the empire that was America. CONTAINMENT. As the public realised that casualties were caused by containment of communism not communism itself public support began to drop.…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This also raises the question of whether or not he tried to keep these events a secret because he already knew they were not the right thing to do. I am not saying I agree with these bombings, but I do believe that they were justified. Nixon was one of the many leaders during the Vietnam war. Others included Diem, Ho Chi Minh, and Truman. People have many different opinions on these people and their ability to lead a country.…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Vietnam war was a very controversial war. Many believed that it was too bloody of a war, with no reward for the loses. However, during Lyndon B. Johnson’s presidency, he strongly believed that there was a need to help South Vietnam become independent. During his speech at Johns Hopkins University, he updates the audience on the war, explains why we are at war, and lastly shares his goals for war. This speech was given in 1965, a year after the Gulf of Tonkin Incident, which led Johnson to enter the United States into war in Vietnam.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    South Vietnam War Thesis

    • 1065 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The incident is still a subject of great controversy and debate as it prompted the American entrance into the Vietnam war. Many claim that President Johnson was aware that there was not a battle. It is the reports from North Vietnam that add more doubt to the entire situation. General Vo Nguyen Giap insisted that the event was created by the Americans to justify action against Northern Vietnam (Drea). Along with North Vietnam, many US officials were discrediting the event.…

    • 1065 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays