Human Emotion In Decision Making Essay

1233 Words 5 Pages
1.0 Introduction
Human emotion contributes to decision-making process, however, it has always been viewed as an impediment in the quest of sensible decisions. Consequently, any exhaustive account of foreign policy-decision making should consider the impact of emotion such as anger, humiliation, revenge or fear when arriving at some decisions. Leaders – who run states – all over make decisions based on their own personalities, cultural values, experience, and basic emotion at a particular time. Schafer and Crichlow (2010) note that the decision-process within the state is fundamentally an individual process filled with those things that are human such as errors, biases, personalities and interpretations (p. 9). But the emotion experienced during
…show more content…
85). Since they are a consistent part of human existence, they influence every decision made whether it deals with the individual or others. This is what happens at the state level when leaders engage in foreign policy making or decisions that involve the nation. Although this varies depending on the political system whether democratic or autocratic and the leaders who make operate and make some of these systems. The human emotion will always play a critical role in the overall decisions. While autocratic leaders will generally make decision solely without much or any consultation, democratic leaders leading in a democratic space will have to comply with the structures in place – constitution – in order to make some decisions. Maki (2016) notes that national referendums are emotive because they tell how the public feels about a situation and will be used to influence national decisions (p. 370). A good example is the ‘Brexit’ situation of 2016 when Britain took a referendum to decide whether or not to come out of the European Union (EU) where majority favored existing the union. Although Britain’s Prime Minister at the time, David Cameron, wanted his country to remain for reasons he deemed of national interest, majority of the people felt otherwise as evidenced by a vote of those who wanted to leave …show more content…
This is because foreign policy issues are crucial and they shape how the world exists and relates. Moberg and Mench (2000) define stress as physiological and mental response produced when a person perceives a threat to his or her existence (p. 1). The authors further state that stress is not a bad thing, but it can result from other straightforward emotions such as anger or fear. Some of the foreign decisions that have been made have been driven by stress where demand over sufficiency is the situation. Some of those decisions have yielded good results while others have not. One bad foreign policy decision whose effect can be felt today was President’s George Bush’s decision to invade Iraq in 2003 given that his administration was stressed by the idea that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and that they had to dispose Saddam Hussein because they thought he funded terrorists organizations (Mcquaig, 2007, p. 43). Although President Bush and his administration acted out of his own convictions – they saw a threat to their basic values and had intelligence on the ongoing in Iraq – the effects of the decision have been attributed to surge of Islamic states and war in Syria as emanating from that destabilization (Anderson, 2011, p.

Related Documents