Unhealthy Diets In America

Improved Essays
Unhealthy diets are the main cause of the many diseases that affect the lives of many Americans. Unhealthy foods had been discussed many times, which has brought up many tactics to remove unhealthy foods from people’s diets’. There are many tactics to remove unhealthy foods from being one of the main sources of food, which is to use taxes which would take the unhealthy food, so unhealthy foods aren’t so accessible. There were many claims to leave those to eat what they want because they believe it's their body, and they should be able to anything they want. People believe they should be able to eat anything they want; however there are many diseases that harm Americans lives, therefore we should make the unhealthy foods more expensive so that they aren't very accessible. …show more content…
In the article, “Bad Food? Tax It, and Subsidize Vegetables” by Bittman he brings up the idea that we should tax unhealthy food. He goes off to explain how taxing unhealthy foods will make it less easy to obtain and while making healthy foods cheaper we can easy to obtain. He also uses the number of how many people are being affected by the consumption of unhealthy foods, using numbers of how much money could be saved if people where to eat healthily. Also going into debt on how sodas are being consumed annually and how much money is generated. With all the info it's easy to see that a good proposal is to tax all of these unhealthy foods such as sodas. Seeing how sodas are being consumed daily and in the billion annually it would be a good thing to tax something that is bad for someone healthy and also easy to obtain. Taxing sodas would decrease the purchase of these sodas. In conclusion, taxing these solids would be a good start to change because they would decrease the amount purchases and amount consumed. To give a proposal we would also need to understand the severity of those sodas that are affecting the lives of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Higher-income earning individuals have access to better education, research and development, such as Howard Moskowitz (Moss 263), and obtain the knowledge about the foods that are processed. Through this they avoid the obesity risk whereas the low income individual is simply taking what they can get, whether they have the full knowledge of it or not. The inferences that can be conjured about culture, politics, and economics in the United States through Monica Dranes’s statement about “Lunchables” in The Extraordinary Science of Addictive Junk Food, by Michael Moss, is that the United States consists of characters that act on impulse to feed to their gratification all often under the manipulation of grand companies. We have warnings about many of the items that we want to consume, but at the end of the day we want to get our hands not necessarily on something that makes us healthy, but what makes us…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The most common solution to problems in the American government is to implement taxes. This happened with the tobacco industry and now it is being proposed again, but this time it’s directed towards the food industry. Mark Bittman’s article “Bad Food? Tax it, and Subsidize Vegetables” featured in The New York Times argues that the average American diet is life threatening. The health risks that come with eating over processed food with too much sugar are costly and dangerous.…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Enter the twenty-first century: Greek yogurt, quinoa, juice cleanses, and Fitbits. Eating healthier and making the right choices at mealtime have gained popularity. And food companies have evolved to meet the demands of the customers who want all-natural, organic, GMO-free products. Yet despite this push to eat healthier, it appalls me that our efforts are being reversed by our very own government. O’Connor writes that the federal government subsidizes foods, like corn and soybeans.…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Brownell and Frieden remind us that "taxes on Tobacco products have been highly effective in reducing consumption”. Making such comparison instills hope in the reader generating him or her to truly believe that there can be a decrease in obesity. The comparison to tobacco at first seems powerful because it's a topic that everyone is quite familiar with yet it's not a clever comparison. To buy tobacco one must be 18 years old, however the consumption of sweetened beverages can start at a very young age. In addition, tobacco has always been advertised as being deadly to health even on the product itself, on the other hand we are never informed of how toxic sugar sweetened beverages can result to be.…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article, “A Food Manifesto for the Future”, Mark Bittman explains how our diet is unhealthful and dangerous. As he critics the unsustainable system we currently uses, he then begins to list different ideas that could be implemented to improve our commodity chains. In this list to improve our system, Bittman states that one solution could be to tax the marketing and sale of unhealthful foods. Although this may seem to be an unnecessary option that many could believe it as a plan leading towards failure, after reading scholarly journals by Mintz and co-authors Clarke, Mytton and Rayner, I conclude that this recommendation could be great for our society if properly implemented.…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is evident that over the years the government has increased the amount of restrictions placed on food significantly in America. In the article, ' 'Government Control of Your Diet ' ' The ideas discussed exemplify why government food regulations infringe on our own personal decisions regarding what we wish to put into our bodies. Not only does this infringe on our private decisions, it also intervenes by providing basic and inadequate information the general public already knows. Last but not least is the health care programs costs being justified by unhealthy habits.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Balko concludes by asserting that individual citizens would make healthier food choices if someone else was not paying for the consequences of those choices. The main point of Balko’s essay is that it is no one’s business but our own what we consume. Ultimately, Balko insists the way to tackle America’s obesity epidemic is by focusing on personal responsibility rather than government interference. My feelings on the issue are mixed. I do support the position that the fast food industries are responsible for America’s obesity epidemic, but I find Balko’s argument about personal responsibility being the key to good health to be equally persuasive and also more logical.…

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wendell Berry argues that we should ‘’eat responsibly’’, meaning that the individual is responsible. Along with David Barboza notes that big food companies say ‘’despite some promises to offer healthier foods and in some cases to limit marketing in schools, deny that they are to blame for the epidemic of excess weight. They insist that sedentary behavior, a lack of exercise, and poor supervision and eating habits are responsible’’ (Barboza). On the other hand, Michael Pollan blames government policies for the fact that ‘’Our entire food supply has undergone a process of ‘’cornification’’ in recent years, without our even noticing it’’. In my view, I agree with Michael Pollan and Wendell Berry because it’s the government’s fault that our food supply is all corn and also that it’s our fault because we can choose what we eat and that’s mighty factor in health and…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People eat what is in front of them and when entering a grocery store you always see all these advertisements about sweets and sugar and if the government changed it and maybe advertised fruits and vegetables, people would think about fruits and vegetable more and more (Schmidt). Also, I believe that the government should intervene whenever it comes to the public health of their citizens. While I understand the people’s point that government intervention would cause violation of people eating what they want and being free to choose what they want (Bakst). While that is understandable, it is still very wrong. To reduce the obesity rates in the us, the government in some areas enforced the soda tax which would mean that stores would have to pay more and causing customers to pay more which while not perfect, is a start and could lead into good directions (Brownell).…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The government is increasing its power, slowly but surely, and soon the Federal government will try to control every aspect of a citizen’s life. The American government should not have a say in the diets of American citizens for three reasons: Citizens have the right to personal choice, the government is influenced by big food industries, and controlling American diets could become a gateway into controlling other aspects of everyday life for Americans. It is an understood and clearly stated fact that all American citizens have the right to personal choice. However it would seem that more…

    • 1039 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Food corporations have come to a point where they are more interested in how well their company is doing rather than the country’s health. So ultimately, the rise in obesity is because of these food productions little interest to care about the health of the country. In Michael Pollan’s The Omnivore’s Dilemma, he proves that food corporations are only interested in the money rather than the well-being of the country. He says that a “cheaper agricultural commodities [are] driving food companies to figure out new and ever more elaborate ways to add value and so induce us to buy more” (Pollan 96).…

    • 2977 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    High- Risk Nutritional Behaviors among Ten Cultures Different people have their own cultural practices to prepare and consume the foods. There are many high- risk nutritional practices among different cultures such as alcoholism, smoking, drug abuse, consumption of high fat and high sugar diet and others (Purnell, 2013). As a health care worker it is very important to understand and observe the high- risk nutritional practices of people from a various cultural background so that necessary health education can be given to promote the health status and prevent many diseases associated with high- risk nutritional practices. This paper will describe regarding the high- risk nutritional practices of ten cultures and beliefs system that influence…

    • 1767 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “ Today , over 60 % of adults in the United States are Overweight or Obese. Poor diet is killing more Americans than smoking , With the poor diet from Americans eating unhealthy and there putting their bodies at risk because of the food that consume in their own bodies. With the poor diet and not enough exercise Americans are being put at risk of death because of the food that they are eating and poorly or non exercise at all. Facts have been proved that their have been more deaths by poor diet than lighting up to smoke a cigarette now a days. Based on stats from 2010, nearly 680,000 people die from their dietary habits, versus just over 465,000 from smoking(Mat McDermott).…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although I concede that “[w]hatever happened to personal responsibility” (David Zinczenko, Author, “Don’t Blame the Eater,” 391) is a legitimate statement when it comes to eating, I still maintain the fact that many Americans eat what is available and accessible to…

    • 1091 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Altering the cost of food, an absolute necessity, can be seen as enforcing great limitation on individuals’ choices. This composes an important downfall to the junk food tax in concern for the individual, for whom it is viewed that choice is essential to autonomy, and is hence fundamental to wellbeing (Markus & Schwartz 2010). Smith (2006) defines junk food as those commercial products that have little or no nutritional value but do contain plenty of kilojoules, salt, and fats. The quantity of foods falling under this umbrella term is immense, rendering limitation of personal choice a particularly pervasive and hence significant possible outcome. Researchers have examined existing evidence for food taxes, to find that an increase of as much as 20% in the price of unhealthy food and drink would be required to cut consumption enough that obesity levels would be reduced (Campbell 2012).…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays