Sugar, fat and obesity are only a couple of words that prove to be the start of one of the biggest arguments in the history of the US and even the world. Sugar is a substance that is used in most of our sweets, drinks and more and is evidently becoming more popular by the day. The argument comes from the fact that people believe that sugar is the leading cause of obesity and research has proved that. The argument stems from two things, people believing that sugar is good and other believing sugar is bad and other being whether government intervention is needed or not. While sugar is bad for you in enormous quantities I believe that sugar is still good and healthy when taken in good amounts and I believe that government intervention is needed
…show more content…
People eat what is in front of them and when entering a grocery store you always see all these advertisements about sweets and sugar and if the government changed it and maybe advertised fruits and vegetables, people would think about fruits and vegetable more and more (Schmidt). Also, I believe that the government should intervene whenever it comes to the public health of their citizens. While I understand the people’s point that government intervention would cause violation of people eating what they want and being free to choose what they want (Bakst). While that is understandable, it is still very wrong. To reduce the obesity rates in the us, the government in some areas enforced the soda tax which would mean that stores would have to pay more and causing customers to pay more which while not perfect, is a start and could lead into good directions (Brownell). While I do understand why people would think that the soda tax might affect the poor neighborhoods, the soda tax while a start is still imperfect and if designed taking in all factors would help the communities because the money from the taxes could be used for a lot of different things (Bowden) and how some research has showed that there is no correlation between soda tax and obesity (Marlow and
People eat what is in front of them and when entering a grocery store you always see all these advertisements about sweets and sugar and if the government changed it and maybe advertised fruits and vegetables, people would think about fruits and vegetable more and more (Schmidt). Also, I believe that the government should intervene whenever it comes to the public health of their citizens. While I understand the people’s point that government intervention would cause violation of people eating what they want and being free to choose what they want (Bakst). While that is understandable, it is still very wrong. To reduce the obesity rates in the us, the government in some areas enforced the soda tax which would mean that stores would have to pay more and causing customers to pay more which while not perfect, is a start and could lead into good directions (Brownell). While I do understand why people would think that the soda tax might affect the poor neighborhoods, the soda tax while a start is still imperfect and if designed taking in all factors would help the communities because the money from the taxes could be used for a lot of different things (Bowden) and how some research has showed that there is no correlation between soda tax and obesity (Marlow and