'Trial Lawyers Cater To Jurors' Demands For Visual Evidence

Decent Essays
In the article “Trial Lawyers Cater to Jurors’ Demands for Visual Evidence,” the author Sylvia Hsieh focuses on how lawyers want the case to happen, how visual evidence can be helpful, and how it can be harmful to the case. First the author Hsieh explains how lawyers expect others to understand how the current case happened. Lawyers have a good understanding and focus towards the case and know how they can explain how their client is innocent to the crime at hand, but it is harder for a Jury to understand it just as well or stay focused long to know all the important details. Second the author Hsieh explains how video evidence can be good. Video evidence can be good because it makes it easier for the Jury to understand what happened and how

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the court case The People of the State of Colorado v. Sandra L. Jacobson, Jacobson is convicted of homicide. The homicide resulted from her truck colliding with a taxi cab while she was driving under the influence. There were two passengers in the taxi at the time of the collision and both were killed. Jacobson appealed the court’s decision on the basis that the trial court did not allow her attorneys to gauge whether or not the jury had become biased due to mid-trial publicity that included inadmissible information. On the fourth day of the trial, the Court was made aware of the fact that a local television network would be covering the incident that led to this trial on its evening news program.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Casey Anthony Case Study

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The evidence found at a crime scene can be used to provide visual evidence. Evidence used should be used with wisdom. Visual evidence helps the jury gain a better understanding of what took place during that time. People can’t go to trial without some type of presentation such as animations, graphics, and videos. Presentations may be costly but it can make the difference between being freedom or prison.…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    The multiple dimensions of tunnel vision in criminal cases. Wisconsin Law Review, 2 Garrett, B. L. (2008) ‘Judging innocence’. Columbia Law Review, 55-14 Gohara, M. (2006) ‘A lie for a lie: False confessions and the case for reconsidering the legality of deceptive interrogation techniques’.…

    • 114 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Brilliant Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In class we did a trial on ‘’ The Ransom Of Red Chief “. Prosecutors and Defense teams had good enough evidence they needed to support their case but they could've had a little more. Although , the most credible evidence defense had was when they brought bags of hair of the kitties Red Chief had killed. On the other hand , prosecutors had a rope and sack that Sam and Bill tried to kidnap Red Chief in also known as Johnny. While supporting their evidence and giving statements about their case , prosecutors had won.…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Trial Lawyers to Jurors’ Demands for Visual Evidence” states “Carney, a former prosecutor, noticed over a decade ago that juries weren’t grasping evidence in criminal cases and his office wasn’t…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As Holloway pointed out, eyewitness testimony plays a significant role in sending innocent people to prison (Holloway, 2015). Yet, I feel that she only vaguely covered the topic. Because eyewitness testimony is a major component of the American criminal justice system, Holloway should have better emphasized the faultiness of eyewitness…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a real-life trial within a courtroom, there are two sides: the plaintiff and defense. The plaintiff’s role is to prosecute the defendant with a crime, and the defense’s role is to vindicate the defendant of the crime accused. To do so, a story must be told, followed by an argument with evidence as aid. The person in charge of the final verdict is the judge or the jury. In the book, Just Mercy by Bryan Stevenson, the readers become the jury and Stevenson is the lawyer who is presenting the injustice within the case of Walter McMillian.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    General Difference Between Successful and Unsuccessful Mental Disorder Defense Despite many characteristics mentioned in the above, the fact that most individuals found NCRMD have had previous contact with the psychiatric system or history records with the criminal justice system are very interesting to acknowledge. When compared with individuals with successful the NCRMD defense and unsuccessful NCRMD defense, individuals with NCRMD found more involvement with the psychiatric previously(Gullets, 2016). It suggests that the offenders who have been diagnosed with a mental disorder in the past have more possibility of successful NCRMD defense compared to others with no previous records with the psychiatrist. In another words, the previous records…

    • 1688 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    CSI Effect Essay

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Criminal justice practitioners are changing their behavior to accommodate the perception that jurors want scientific evidence” (p.383-399). As this study, has shown, jurors are not influenced particularly by CSI or any of the many other television shows of that genre. It is clear, however, that jurors do significantly expect that prosecutors will use the advantages of modern science and technology to help meet their burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Donald Shelton (2010). Up to now, there has not been a lot of research covered proving that the watching crime television and verdict decisions simulated criminal trials.…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In today’s trial cases, lawyers are itching for any type of visual evidence that will defend their side. As jurors spend long hours listening to arguments and orders, visual evidence is a great way to keep them engaged. Any type of visual evidence make “their side of the story” more illustrated and personal. Brain Carney, a former prosecutor, said that every legal case can be turned into a visual story.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Without full information an attorney cannot do their job in full. Evidence: Eye witness identification: Eyewitness misidentification is the single greatest cause of wrongful convictions nationwide, playing a role in nearly 75% of convictions overturned through DNA testing. While eyewitness testimony can be persuasive evidence before a judge or jury, 30 years of strong…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Balancing the tension between community interest and individual rights and freedoms are a significant component of the criminal trial process and is relatively successful in that retrospect. In order to be effective and efficient the criminal trial process should reflect the moral and ethical standards of society, ensure the community is sufficiently protected and respects the rights of the individual. However, despite efforts to achieve justice for all members of society, the criminal trial process does fail to provide adequate success in some areas of the law such as the jury system, Legal Aid and the provocation defence. All these areas to an extent highlight the lack of success the criminal trial process serves in balancing community interests…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Persuading someone to take your side in an argument is not an easy task to accomplish. There are many things a person must learn in order to become an effective persuader. In the movie twelve angry men, persuasion plays a huge role; as the jury has to decide whether the boy (who is accused of murdering his father) is guilty or innocent. This movie is a great example of ad hominem; which is a logical fallacy in which the argument is countered by attacking the person, their motive, or other things relating to the person who is making the argument. In the movie, every juror is convinced that the boy is guilty of the crime; but there is one juror, juror number eight pleads not guilty.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Going into the field of law enforcement, it is important for officers to prepare and follow correct procedures in order to increase their credibility as an officer, and to aid in a guilty verdict. Evidence to the Court Evidence is a crucial element during trial to increase the credibility, reliability, and validity of an individual’s testimony. In the QB trial video, R v. Perry and Manitoba (2016) a wallet, a Timex watch, a kitchen knife, and a gun replica entered in as physical evidence and can act as direct, or indirect evidence connected to a crime. Usually, this type of evidence is entered through a witness, which in this case was Monty Hall who was the victim.…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The movie “12 Angry Men” opens to the jury room and fills with twelve juries’ arguments and complain over the murder case. The case was about whether an eighteen year old boy should be found guilty or not guilty about his action. He was accused of killing his father by stabbing him with a knife. The boy’s life is depended on the twelve juries, and those juries are gathered in all different work fields with a little knowledge in criminal justice. The juries began its deliberations; they started to vote and all the jury vote “guilty” except for one, voted “not guilty”.…

    • 1353 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays