Three Strikes Law

Improved Essays
Lesson 4 Essay
Medical Malpractice can be defined as the negligent or irresponsible medical treatment of a doctor, nurse or other medical practitioner that results in injury or death of a patient in their care (McMillen Law Firm, 2013). One of the unique qualities about Florida is its exercise of the ‘Three Strikes Law’. The relatively recent amendment to the Florida Constitution would automatically revoke the medical license of any doctor hit with three malpractice judgments which makes Florida one of the most hostile states for physicians.
In my opinion, when it comes to protecting patients and physicians alike, there should be limitations set in place for each party. The Three Strike Law and Malpractice Law itself is mostly designed to
…show more content…
A very popular example of this is Michal Jackson’s doctor, Conrad Murray, who was charged with involuntary manslaughter. In many of these cases involve over prescribing drugs, especially narcotics. In these cases resembling the situation mentioned, I do believe that a doctor is to be charged criminally. I think that many doctors are too quick to push pills and antibiotics to their patients. It is at the doctor’s discretion to provide the best possible healthcare for their patient which also includes preventing possible development of drug addictions.
Works Cited
Associated Press. (2004, November 26). Florida Passes Three-Strikes Malpractice Law. Retrieved from New York Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/26/national/26malpractice.html?_r=1&
McMillen Law Firm. (2013). Florida Malpractice. Retrieved from The Florida Malpractice Website: http://www.floridamalpractice.com/
Medical Malpractice Law-Protecting Injured Patients. (2012, July 15). Retrieved from LGCSC Legal Health Laws: http://www.lgcsc.org/medical-malpractice-law-protecting-injured-patients/
Tort Reform Law and Legal Definition. (2014). Retrieved from US Legal: http://definitions.uslegal.com/t/tort-reform/
Weiss, T. (2008, May 5). Reasons Not To Become A Doctor. Retrieved from Forbes:

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    New York City College of Technology City University of New York Law and Ethics Case: Jeanette M. and the Phone Call Erica Rotstein October 7, 2017 Professor Bonsignore HAS 3560 -Legal Aspects of Health Care Abstract The advancement in the field of medicine over the years has led to doctors and health care providers having more responsibilities on their hands. This brings into question what should and shouldn’t be done, as well as what is morally and ethically right. However, this isn’t so cut and dry.…

    • 1877 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    3 Strikes Law Critique

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Critique 2 The presentation by David Meidel on the Three Strikes law was well done. Talking loud and clear, as well as maintaining eye contact with the audience, and making the occasional gestures when appropriate, Meidel was able to communicate to the class his position of supporting the Three Strikes law. Meidel appeared confident and his presentation lasted for about fourteen minutes, which has been the average presentation time so far.…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The three strike rule, specifically in California, enacted circa 1994 was intended to deter recidivism and decrease violent crimes. This was executed by requiring a defendant who was previously convicted of a felony to serve twice the term the conviction would otherwise require. For example, if the new conviction was for a ten years sentence and the defendant had a previous conviction he/she would serve around twenty years in an effort to deter future crime. The concept behind the three strike rule was to deter recidivism, especially aimed to put away violent repeat offenders.…

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The California Three Strikes Law is an example of a mandatory sentencing policy. The law states that a person who commits a serious felony after two or more “strikes” will be sentenced to minimum of twenty-five years to life in prison. The “seriousness” of the felony is a new consideration that was implemented in 2012 (Couzens & Bigelow, 2012, "California's Three Strikes Sentencing Law"). Prior to the amendment, the law was applicable to ANY felony offense that was considered a third “strike.” This law has lead to the subsequent influx of non-violent prisoners that have engulfed the California prison system.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    1. The Three Strikes Law is a law that constructs the actions courts must take to handle a felon convicted a third time. Moreover, it works to paralyze those more like to commit crimes by forcing the courts to impose harsher sentences on repeat criminal offenders. 2. States virtually had different ways of passing their three strikes law.…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The California Three Strikes Law No laws have drawn much public outcry in their inception and later amendment like the California Three Strikes Law. Enacted in 1994, the law was aimed at deterring repeat offenders. It requires that a defendant convicted of any new felony, and having committed a more serious felony in the past be sentenced to state prison for twice term that’s normally given for such offence. And if the defendant had committed any felony with two or more prior strikes, they were to be sentenced to 25 years to life imprisonment.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Three Strikes Laws

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Three strikes laws, also known as habitual offender laws, were enacted after a series of violent crimes occurred where defendants had multiple convictions but had attained parole despite those convictions. One such crime, according to pollyklaas.org (n.d.), was that of 12-year-old Polly Klaas who was kidnapped, molested, and murdered by known sex offender Richard Allen Davis who was out on parole at the time of this occurrence. Polly’s father, Marc, pushed for a change in the criminal laws that allowed this known offender out of prison on what he felt was too lenient of a sentence. This call for change initiated by Marc Klaas was resoundingly undertaken by politicians, lobbyists, and the general public. The first state who adopted what is now…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    A cross-sectional time series analysis from 1986-2005 measured the effect the three strikes laws had in deterring people from committing crimes as well as incapacitation efforts. The effect of the three strikes laws on crime in California and the measurement of the increase or decrease in the type of crime. The effort of controlling crime trends, economic, demographic and policy factors. The study indicated a slow decline in murder rates, and has done little for incapacitation on crime. Robbery, burglary, larceny and motor vehicle theft rates declined faster.…

    • 147 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Flaws In The Three Strikes Law The Three Strikes Law was originally enacted in 1994 in California. The law came about in 1992 when a young innocent girl named Kimber Reynolds from Fresno was murdered in an attempted purse snatching by two convicts who had previously just finished serving their times in prison. Immediate after the death of Kimber, her father Mike was inspired to take action to help prevent innocent people from getting harmed by criminals. Mike Reynolds and his group put together a law and named it, “Three Strikes and You’re Out!” law.…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The practice of ‘defensive medicine’ may lead to the withholding of beneficial treatment to the majority because of a statistical risk to the minority In general, all physicians need to recognize the risks of their professional duties but not to be so obsessive about the possibility of legal consequences. When physicians do extra tests or procedures to reduce malpractice liability, they are practicing positive defensive medicine. When they avoid certain procedures or patients, they are practicing negative defensive medicine…

    • 79 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is argued by many that current tort laws are unfair and that very high, even unfair, amounts of compensation are being paid out as a result of theses cases. This has brought of the discussion of Tort Reform. In essence, Tort Reform is looking to limit the number of cases by limiting the types of cases that can be filed, when…

    • 1051 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Three Strikes Law

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages

    However, the utilitarian approach also states that punishment should rehabilitate the offender. Punishment should be individualized and taken on a case-by-case basis. With the three strikes law, punishment becomes too generalized and there is no indeterminate sentencing to see if offenders could be released early if they are rehabilitated. Furthermore, a 2004 study concluded that “...it does not appear that three-strikes in California has had a significant deterrent or incapacitative effect on crime”. For these reasons, not acting as an effective deterrence and not individualizing punishment, the three-strikes…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Look at 4 Medical Malpractice Statistics Medical errors claim nearly 10 percent of the population, a revelation that, in part, led to current health care reforms. [1] Care providers can prevent many of these deaths with better coordination and improved organizational performance. To date, improving safety has proved difficult for health care organizations due to a discipline wide lack of direction in research medical errors. Medical Errors That Cause Mortalities in the United States In the United States, among a talent pool of 371,125 physicians, there were 148,909 payments made for medical malpractice resulting in 409,088 adverse actions and requiring 56,940 practitioners to seek reinstatement.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hospitals are given incentives, to drive down the readmission rates as well as encourage more safety to be implemented to ensure they stay down (Boerner, 2016). Now that these rules and regulations are in place, it’s too late to catch those who have been affected. The good news is that it increases the overall attention to the healthcare industry and the importance of identifying diagnostic errors correctly, as well as making sure all staff is educated on the continual process of improvement. What seems to be one of the bigger issues associated with medical malpractice, is the insurance that covers both physicians and hospitals from getting sued. Malpractice insurance is in place to cover the doctor and or the facility in which the procedures are taking place.…

    • 1921 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These included things such as caps on damages. Despite the intuitive appeal of such reforms there is little in the way of strong data regarding their efficacy. Studies that encompassed all 50 states showed some reduction in claim payouts, however, there was little to no effect upon insurance premiums. (copy)Regardless of their ability to achieve their stated goals, traditional reforms do not address problems with the malpractice system 's 2 core functions—compensating negligently injured patients and deterring substandard care.) Still as it stands a patient must often wait 5 years between filing for compensation and finalizing the claim.…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays