How Did The Three Strike Rule Deter Recidivism

Improved Essays
The three strike rule, specifically in California, enacted circa 1994 was intended to deter recidivism and decrease violent crimes. This was executed by requiring a defendant who was previously convicted of a felony to serve twice the term the conviction would otherwise require. For example, if the new conviction was for a ten years sentence and the defendant had a previous conviction he/she would serve around twenty years in an effort to deter future crime.

The concept behind the three strike rule was to deter recidivism, especially aimed to put away violent repeat offenders. This was under the provision of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994. According to the Legislative analyst’s office of california,
...[i]mposing

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    One weekend in June of 1992, Kimber Reynold arrived at home to go to a wedding, she was eighteen years old. After the wedding, Kimber and her friend decided to go out to eat and later drive home, where they meet Joe Davis and Douglas Walker. When the two men went to rob the young ladies, Gladwell states, “He pulled out a .357 magnum handgun and placed it against [Kimber’s] right ear. She resisted. He fired (233).”…

    • 160 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Three Strikes Law Cases

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Throughout the years, there has been much controversy weather The Three Strike Law is cruel and unjust, while judges have been giving disproportionate sentences. “The Eight Amendment to the United States Constitution is part of United States Bill of Rights prohibiting the federal government from imposing excessive bail, excess fines, or cruel and usual punishment, including torture.” Was the Three Strike Law unconstitutional? Was the intent to get violent repeat officers incarcerated for a long period, or to get all offenders with three strikes off the streets? Due to the Three Strike Law judges have been given disproportionate sentences in years.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Historically the three strikes law was enacted to remove serious violent offenders that with two prior violent felonies from society and send them to prison for a lengthy term. This was all done to protect society from violent offenders. However, over time the courts in for example California were sentencing two strike felons with subsequent felonies to 25 years without the possibility of parole.…

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A jury may also exercise the sentencing guidelines are usually imposed by the judge in most cases, but sentencing or it can be mandated by a statue; such as, mandatory prison sentence for certain crimes. There are various forms of sentences that are to be reviewed: concurrent and consecutive sentences, good time, sentencing sanctions, sentencing models, indeterminate sentences, determine sentences, structured sentences, feral sentencing guidelines, mandatory minimum sentences, and that of the three-strikes laws. The issue with concurrent and consecutive sentences is that concurrent sentences allow for than one sentence to be served at the same time as the others, while consecutive sentences only allow for one sentence to be served at a time, this is good in the case that there…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1994, California legislators and voters made a change in the state’s criminal sentencing law, known as Three Strike and You’re Out. This law was passed after several high profile murders were committed by ex-felons. These ex-felons made communities concerned that violent offenders released from prison would go on to perpetrate serious, violent crimes. The Three Strikes law had a minimum sentence of twenty-five years to life for three-time great offenders who had multiple priors of violent felony convictions. This law had longer prison sentences for certain repeat offenders and required sentence intensifications for convicted felons who had previously committed violent felonies.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Polly Klaas Trial

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This is superseded by AB 2716, which increases the minimum time served to 85 percent of the sentence for violent felonies. The three-strikes law states that the most severe prison terms are reserved for those who have previously committed "serious" or "violent" felonies. In general, California law defines violent felonies as those that cause injury to the victim or threaten the victim with a deadly weapon (for example, murder and voluntary manslaughter, mayhem, most forcible sexual offenses, and some categories of robbery, assault, and burglary). Serious felonies include all violent felonies, plus others where there is a potential for injury to the victim (for example, arson and the remaining categories of robbery, assault, and…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    3 Strikes Research Paper

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Three Strikes Law The purpose of the three strikes law is to dramatically increase punishment for persons convicted of a felony who have previously been convicted of one or more "serious" or "violent" felonies. The Three Strikes law fundamentally expands the prison sentences of people convicted of felonies who have been already been convicted of a vicious or serious felony, and limits the capacity of these guilty parties to get a discipline other than a prison sentence. Brutal and serious felonies are particularly recorded in state law.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the article, “NM swims against criminal justice reform tide” by Joey Peters, Mathew Coyte highlights that tougher three strikes law is making our prison sentences overcrowded so quickly (Figure 6); that “the reality is people in the system know that is unsustainable as a way of running a criminal justice system. We don’t have big enough jails to sustain that” (Peters). He is arguing that they are so many criminals out there on the streets, but to make our city safe we don’t have enough prisons to lock all of them away. He said that tougher three strikes law would not work for us, it would wrongly take decision away from judges, increase prison population, and the complaints from people over prison conditions at the end it will end up damaging the state economy. I argue that even though the prison in New Mexico gets overcrowded with the tougher three strikes law, it should not be that big problem for many people because it is still helping them to keep the criminals off the streets, which is also helping the crime rate to go down and help us protect from those violent criminals.…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    rehabilitation, this type of sentencing model channels the underlying causes of crime in order to reduce future offending (Worrall, 2015). In colonial times, sentencing was solely on retributive and later on deterrence. However in the late 1800's, sentencing became premised on rehabilitation. This then led to a system of punishment called indeterminate sentencing. Sentencing often had wide ranges involving minimum and maximum terms that could sentence someone as little as a day to life in prison.…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Three Strikes Laws

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This law was two-fold in that it kept the violent, repeat offenders in prison and the public at large safe. According to findlaw.com (n.d.), there are 28 States who have three strikes laws, or habitual offender laws, they are: Massachusetts, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin. The laws place those defendants who have prior felony convictions, at least one or more being violent, into a sentence enhancing structure. Each state varies but the minimum term of imprisonment can be 25 years to life and prior convictions from other states contribute to the three…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Group based correctional services are set up for delinquents giving them a chance to reintegrate back into the community to serve their remaining jail time (Antonacci, 158). After the delinquent has served a segment of their time in jail, the delinquent is evaluated for the risk or danger they may cause the community and recidivism, then after that they are permitted to serve the remained of their time in the community, if the evaluation goes well (Antonacci, 158). The house arrest of Martha Stewart resulted in much public debate about this community corrections approach. Some people in society believed this was not an acceptable punishment to be given to Martha Stewart for her actions, as they believed that the punishment appeared to be light…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stanford University law professor Herbert Packer’s models analyze two contrasting standpoints of the way the criminal justice system is, or should strive to, be. The two split positions charted by the Crime Control and Due Process models seek to describe perhaps the two most prominent positions in regards to the power and influence of the criminal justice system: that the safety of the community should be valued over all else, or that the rights of the individual are the most important values to uphold. These ideological conflicts remain the forefront of problems within the criminal justice system, and understanding each persuasion is essential to analyzing and overcoming differences in each stage of the criminal justice process. The Crime…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drug Courts Recidivism

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Due to the implications of Reagan's War on Drugs laws, drug courts have demonstrated and proven to reduce recidivism for offenders who abuse substances. To deter overcrowding in the prisons, Researcher Messer has found that drug courts can be instrumental in deterring offenders from reoffending. It is surprising that “85% of offenders incarcerated require substance abuse treatment” (Messer, 2016). Drug courts allow offenders to “attain important skills/ideas, improve relationships with family and children, a general educational development certificate, a driver’s license, and/or gainful employment” (Messer, 2016). Researcher Shaffer studied over “80 drug courts and found recidivism rates of 46% for those who participated in drug court programming”…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mass Incarceration System

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A system that affected the entire public turned into a disproportionate system that incarcerate a great deal of African Americans. Mass incarceration mainly impact the poor and minorities which has been disproportionately impacted by drug enforcement strategies. Relating to family and opportunity, a widespread of incarcerated men of low income communities which has a negative impact on social and cultural norms. Legal challenges have arisen since the enactment of the three strikes law in 1994. Twenty-five years to life for non-serious and nonviolent felonies were made possible because of the three Strikes law.…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Indeterminate Sentencing

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the early 1970's, a vast number of states transformed their sentencing protocol to new methods that seemed to be more structured as the concerns arose in the criminal justice system (Gregory & Leymon, 2010). Judicial discretion can impact determinate and indeterminate sentences as the power remains among the judge as to the severity of the sentence that will be carried out. " The forms of sentencing sanctions available to judges vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, but generally include diversionary programs, fines, probation, intermediate sanctions, confinement in jail, incarceration in a state or federal prison, and the death penalty", (Siegel & Bartollas, 2014, p. 39).…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays