Three Moral Relativism: The Consequences Of Ethical Beliefs

Superior Essays
According to moral relativism, or ethical relativism, all views, no matter if they vary across cultures or people, are equally valid and no single belief is absolute, but is satisfactory to the moral standards of a person or group of people. These beliefs are stemmed from ones’ environment or preference. Just because something may be right for you, doesn’t necessarily mean that it is right for everyone else. Ethical relativism is linked to normative subjectivism, which describes the state under which a certain action may be considered right or wrong. This means that the action of another can be considered right if the person pursuing that action believes so. Following that, if a particular person finds something to be true, then there is no …show more content…
God exhibits the true moral laws, the ten commandments, and commands us to follow them or else he will punish us. In a morally relativistic culture, the only reason that one would or wouldn’t do anything is to avoid possible consequences. Possible consequences include punishment, which assumes ethical egoism. You want to avoid punishment for your own interest. We obey because it is important to obey your creator, however then comes into question who your creator may be. If your creator is the devil, is it still important to obey the commands you are given? Another reason we obey is because God is omniscient and knows the laws. However, this bypasses Gods command and could be the same for anyone who knows laws. So, just because God commands us doesn’t explain why we should obey. Lastly, the Divine Command Theory explains why we obey. The Divine Command theory is a meta-ethical theory that a “morally good” action is equivalent to whether it is commanded by God. God may command something that is “right” but approves something that is “good”. However, there are some contradictions that go along with this theory. Firstly, God may command us to do something when it is not permissible to. For example, God commanded Abraham to sacrifice Isaac. Abraham was therefore protected, but Isaac was put into the deathly situation. Another contradiction would be if we discovered God doesn’t exist. We would still consider some laws that were brought to our attention when we believed there was a God to be true, for example it is cruel to kill innocents. The last contradiction of the Divine Command Theory is that moral laws supervene on the psycho-physical world. This means that any two worlds that are alike is psycho-physical properties, are also alike in moral properties. All in all, since everything is relative then all of these laws are

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    To add on to this argument for endorsing an absolutist attitude, despite moral relativists taking a tolerant attitude toward other cultures and their customs, the concept of ‘one should do whatever the local custom does, given all things are seen as equal’ is not purely moral relativism because it is based on the existence of an absolute norm. Another reason to reject moral relativism is because relativism does not welcome the possibility that there may just be certain universal moral values. Relativism does not evaluate, analyze, or criticize certain practices in different cultures. An example would be murder.…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    I believe that it is common sense to disagree with moral relativism solely on the fact that it accepts racism, genocide of groups, even murder, as justifiable as long as that is what the group values to be right or acceptable. Having the beliefs of a moral relativist, you could go so far as to say that a group or culture could decide that starting a nuclear war was morally just, and that we as people outside of that group could not criticize those people for their actions. If ethical relativism is to be completely true, there can be no common ground for resolving moral disputes or for reaching an agreement on moral matters between members of different cultures. When it comes to justifying moral relativism, there is no decision procedure that can demonstrate the objective truth or falsity of moral judgments. On the contrary, moral objectivism, also known as moral absolutism, encompasses ethical theories that support the objectivity of moral values and norms.…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical relativism has been looked at from several different angles by many different people. Louis P. Pojman is one person that has not only questioned, but rejected the concept. Pojman’s argument stands on four objections. His protests are that ethical relativism leads to ridiculous outcomes, gives way to subjectivism, is logically inconsistent, and provides no rational method to resolve conflicts within and between cultures. Pojman theorized that, if the world were to go by ethical relativism, one could no longer make judgements against any society, including their own, because no external or objective truth exists.…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Philosophical educator Crash Course, stresses that if the rules of morality are taken from something other than God, then why can others not just find that source and figure out morality for themselves (Crash Course). God no longer needs to command actions if the knowledge of it is available outside of him. This eliminates God from DCT, leaving their view without a commander. DCT is thus false because it is no longer up to God to command moral actions and DCT strictly states the opposite. Although DCT is flawed, Divine Command Theorist could possibly object the Euthyphro Dilemma in efforts to prove their…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral relativism- The idea of moral relativism is one that morality is relevant to your situation, and that you should be accepting other people's morals and cultures. Moral relativism can first be seen in the colonies, mainly by the quakers in pennsylvania, and quakers were also vehemently against slavery, which was another morally relativistic idea. Moral absolutism- The idea that there is a clear right and wrong and that right and wrong is the same for every situation, and the idea has had many impacts on historical events in us history.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the divine command theory, an act is morally good because the gods say that it is morally good; however, there are problems with this theory. The first problem being, the divine command theory does not argue that morality must depend upon religion. Then, there is the possibility of a command changing such as God commanding that murder is alright on Mondays, then commanding that murder is not alright on Monday. On the contrary to the divine command theory, there is the debate between Socrates and Euthyphro, Euthyphro states the opposite: an act is morally good solely because of its goodness and that is why the gods love it.…

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Or could it be that varied answers could be right for different people? Specifically, is morality relative or objective? Cultural relativism and objective moral theory are two opposing arguments that deliver explanations as to what describes a conduct as right or wrong. Accordingly, this essay will examine the differences between both theories to decide which of these two positions is better and why. Cultural relativism is the stance that moral proposals do not reflect objective and/or universal truths but instead make…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Title: In Defense of Relativism Name: Jun Hao Li Word Count: 1319 Prompt you are responding to: Prompt (3) In Defense of Relativism Intro: The philosophical view of relativism states that the moral codes of a culture are all products of the society’s upbringing and that there is no moral code that is superior to another moral code because of the drastically different cultures each society possesses. Therefore, relativists believe it is intolerant of us to judge other cultural practices as immoral, unethical, or wrong.…

    • 1327 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Last year, between the months of April and June, England’s health care system has treated more than 1,026 cases of female mutilation (Topping). Of these a good portion of the girls were under the age of 18. Since September 2014, 4,098 cases of mutilation have been reported-- thousands of girls left either dead or seriously injured. What had started as a cultural phenomenon to discourage girls’ sexual desires has turned into a widely acknowledged epidemic that has spurred the fires of many heated debates. When asked where one stands on the issue, two common answers are likely to appear.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral relativism is a very vague and unclear moral theory, this leaves many questioning the significance of the theory. The topic of moral relativism is very confusing and the thought process behind the theory is muddled. It is wrong to assert that there is no standard of morality, that morality is made truth through an individual’s view on right and wrong. This means no person’s morality is better than another. So judgment cannot be given in any situation and no change would occur due to the lack of constructive criticism.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Moral Skepticism is the belief that it is impossible to truly know if morals are absolute and that nobody can have any knowledge of absolute truth at all. Additionally, if evolutionary theory is true, then there are more good reasons to be moral skeptics. This is due to the notion that evolution will pressure all living things to adapt to their territory and environment so that they are fit for survival. In addition, this survival and fitness-enhancing pressures may not be truth-conductive because what a species needs to survive could contrast with another sect of that same species. Therefore, by this logic, the absoluteness and objectivity of moral beliefs cannot be known.…

    • 2047 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral Relativism Essay

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Although this concept isn’t great for our society, it has a greater success outcome compared to absolutism. In Mary Midgley’s article, she discusses the issues with moral relativism. She claims that although moral relativism doesn’t have the greatest outcome, it is a way to view different cultures. Every culture does something based on their religion and or…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, in cultural relativism it is normally all the members of that certain culture who decides on what is morally acceptable. Perhaps this is why Thomas (2014) believed that, moral beliefs within a culture are true or false depending on whether they accord with the prevailing believes in that culture. However, I believe that both theories are related to a certain extent. For instance, we are all born belonging to a certain culture, community, or society.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    God’s moral commandments should be followed if one is attempting to live by a correct moral code. The argument can be made that following another individual’s moral commandments, even God, would make morality arbitrary and based off subjective opinion, however, this does not imply that certain subjective opinions are not better than ours. God is a higher being than us, this does not imply that he is an omniscient being and knows exactly what is right and what is wrong. What this does imply is that he is comparable to a Principal at a grade school that makes and administers the rules. Yes, the Principal is not a perfect rule maker or person, but he or she is generally more qualified to create and administer rules than the underage students.…

    • 2079 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Therefore, moral truth is relative and varies from culture to culture. Further on, he justifies why the cultural relativism argument is invalid, and why cultural relativism (if it were true) is an unacceptable form of morality. Finally, he makes concessions to acknowledge some valuable learning points of cultural relativism. In this essay, I argue the flaws in his conclusions and maintains that although it is important for objective truths to exist, cultural relativism may still be a best explanation for some extreme cases of disagreements that we observe today.…

    • 1886 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays