Three Moral Relativism: The Consequences Of Ethical Beliefs

Superior Essays
According to moral relativism, or ethical relativism, all views, no matter if they vary across cultures or people, are equally valid and no single belief is absolute, but is satisfactory to the moral standards of a person or group of people. These beliefs are stemmed from ones’ environment or preference. Just because something may be right for you, doesn’t necessarily mean that it is right for everyone else. Ethical relativism is linked to normative subjectivism, which describes the state under which a certain action may be considered right or wrong. This means that the action of another can be considered right if the person pursuing that action believes so. Following that, if a particular person finds something to be true, then there is no …show more content…
God exhibits the true moral laws, the ten commandments, and commands us to follow them or else he will punish us. In a morally relativistic culture, the only reason that one would or wouldn’t do anything is to avoid possible consequences. Possible consequences include punishment, which assumes ethical egoism. You want to avoid punishment for your own interest. We obey because it is important to obey your creator, however then comes into question who your creator may be. If your creator is the devil, is it still important to obey the commands you are given? Another reason we obey is because God is omniscient and knows the laws. However, this bypasses Gods command and could be the same for anyone who knows laws. So, just because God commands us doesn’t explain why we should obey. Lastly, the Divine Command Theory explains why we obey. The Divine Command theory is a meta-ethical theory that a “morally good” action is equivalent to whether it is commanded by God. God may command something that is “right” but approves something that is “good”. However, there are some contradictions that go along with this theory. Firstly, God may command us to do something when it is not permissible to. For example, God commanded Abraham to sacrifice Isaac. Abraham was therefore protected, but Isaac was put into the deathly situation. Another contradiction would be if we discovered God doesn’t exist. We would still consider some laws that were brought to our attention when we believed there was a God to be true, for example it is cruel to kill innocents. The last contradiction of the Divine Command Theory is that moral laws supervene on the psycho-physical world. This means that any two worlds that are alike is psycho-physical properties, are also alike in moral properties. All in all, since everything is relative then all of these laws are

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Divine command theory is the idea that certain actions are morally good or morally bad because they are what God wills for us. God’s demands determine what is right or wrong. What he tells us to do is right, and what he tells us not to do is wrong. This theory states that the only thing that makes an act morally wrong is that God forbids doing it, which implies…

    • 1302 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    If something is good because it is the will of God, then God is Good because this is his will. However, this is an empty tautology. We cannot recognise what it means to praise God for his goodness. It would suggest nothing other than God willing whatever he wants to. Adams objects to this, arguing that a statement such as 'God is Good ' should be understood metaphysically rather than morally.…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The main idea of it is based on what God has ordered us. People who believe in this theory believe that if God ordered for us to do something, then it is good morally, but, if God prohibited something, then it is wrong morally. Also, God created all humans with free will so we each have the choice to live morally right, by following what God wants us to do, or morally incorrect, by committing acts that God has banned (Rachels p. 53). There are many appealing characteristics to the Divine Command Theory. First, it addresses the problem that is usually faced in ethics because it gets rid of the personal emotions in ethics and makes it objective.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In addition, I disagree with Barth’s insistence that only God will be able to rule over evil and the claim that “ When individual human beings, groups or enemies, claim for themselves the right and the power to rid the world of evil they become themselves agents of evil” (p.132) . However many times disruptions in the world may be unseen and unheard of therefore we have to rely on individuals and their morals. Going back to the point of acknowledging our power as humans to do what is right at the time needed instead of doing nothing and accepting that God has a plan is of service to human beings…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thomas Aquinas Argument

    • 1807 Words
    • 8 Pages

    At first it seems unfair to have an eternal punishment for a finite being who commits finite crimes. This idea has turned many people away from the Christian tradition because they do not want to follow a God that they think is unjust and cruel. However, in this ideology God is neither evil nor cruel nor unjust. He is simply acting in perfect justification that is required by his nature. God, in this manner can regain his qualities of completely good and able to send people to an eternal punishment of they choose.…

    • 1807 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Rachels proposes this quote as an objection to DCT, “do the gods command it because it is right?” (51). This quote portrays that God is deducing something to be morally right based on something else, apart from himself. A sophisticated euthyphist would say that because God recognizes something to be right and it is no longer up to him to command actions. The source that God deduced the command from is what determines the action to be morally right or wrong—not God. Philosophical educator Crash Course, stresses that if the rules of morality are taken from something other than God, then why can others not just find that source and figure out morality for themselves (Crash Course).…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Divine Command Theory explains that actions are good if and only if God commands them, and actions are bad if and only if God forbids them. This makes the Divine Command Theory independent of human thought and feeling, it is God who determines what actions are moral. If we were to disobey God that would be an immoral thing to do and thus, we would be punished. We are motivated to follow this theory because it is the only reason why we still follow moral laws. If we were to believe that God did not exist, then there would be no reason for people to do the right thing.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Kant believes it should be a requirement for us to obey the moral law because it is a noble thing to do. Kant does not believe in lying or doing evil, but he does believe in good will. Even if lying will help save a person’s life, Kant still insists that you should not lie because he believes that both a good lie and a bad lie should be prohibited. Kant deals with deontological ethics which is based on ethics out of a sense of duty or obligation. When it comes to good will we are to recognize what our duty is in life, we are to complete that duty, and we must be willing to do what is right no matter the situation.…

    • 1804 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For some we will ask as we are bargaining with God to make circumstances different for we know God to be all powerful. For others we will ask why as we are denying that this sort of evil does not happen to good people. Either way the question remains: why do bad things happen to good people? As humans, our understanding of God is…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Maybe he did fear that there might have been flaw if he did in fact answered the question himself. For Addams’s sake, his theory is applicable only if God lacks human virtues that do not directly categorize God as good. The downside is that if human virtues prove to actually categorize God as good then the Modified Divine Command Theory would no longer be needed. All of this assumes that God has a set of commands in which could be influenced by the human virtues God contains. Nevertheless, the Modified Divine Command Theory provides a good alternative to the highly controversial original Divine Command Theory.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays