Hobbes Argument Or False Assumption Of Human Nature?

Improved Essays
Do you have an unquenchable and selfish desire for power? According to Thomas Hobbes take on human nature, you do. This view will be examined by asking; Does Hobbes’s account of why life would be so bad in the ‘state of nature’ rest on a false assumption about human nature? Who is Thomas Hobbes will be the first premise for investigation then The ‘state of nature’ as defined by Hobbes will be described then assessed. Once there is an understanding of the ‘state of nature’, its relationship with Hobbes view on human nature will be investigated along with the opposing view of John Locke. It will be concluded that human nature is far too varied and complex to have one correct assumption defining every aspect of human life, while Hobbes assumption is correct in some cases, it is incorrect in others. To reach this conclusion, studies concerning human nature will be examined and the evidence will be used to back up my conclusion that Hobbes assumption is incorrect. …show more content…
A social contract is the agreement between citizens and government whereby citizens lend their power to politicians under the justification that politicians use this power for the collective good and to satisfy peoples needs. Hampton, J, (1986) (MORE DETAILS HERE). Due to human nature (according to hobbes) this would lead to an everyman for themselves style of living dominated by mankind’s selfish and self seeking desires which would create a “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short” (HOBBES) life. He declared that human beings are only sociable through the necessity of fulfilling their needs and desires. This state of nature relies entirely on a pessimistic view of human nature and is incompatible with the liberal view of human nature. Liberal Theories about human nature and John Locke will now be

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Meng Tzu Case Study

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In that state of nature we respond to others in three different ways. First, competition, which is what we invade to take what another has for ourselves. Second, diffidence, which is when we fear another and have a desire for safety in order to retain what we already have. Lastly, the strife for glory, which is when we worry about appearing significant in another’s eyes. A society with laws and moral codes can be instituted from a state of nature because Hobbes believed a society is formed is due to fear and the desire for security.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Hobbes, man’s life in the state of nature was one of fear and selfishness. He believes man natural liberty must be limited because, “all mankind [has] a perpetuall and restlesse desire of Power after power, that ceaseth onely in Death”. Under Hobbes philosophies, a social contract focuses man to surrender all their rights and freedoms to an authority. This authority will then protect the lives and properties of the people. The Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen establishes Hobbes often discussed “natural rights of man [which] are the sole causes of the miseries of the world”.…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    How does Hobbes’s view of nature shape his political theory? Political theories make suppositions about nature and/or natural laws. These boundaries (including the behaviors of the people within it) shape actions and decision-making, and the rules of nature thusly form the foundation of the ideology. It is prudent to analyze in-depth this basis for the moral and political philosophy of the great thinkers. The assumptions must make sense if the overall theory of thought built upon this foundation is to hold up.…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I truly believe that genetics are by far one of the biggest factors in determining the action and/or morals of an individual. In this debate, I personally agree with Thomas Hobbes in the idea that the nature of man is evil and as he states, “Everything humans beings voluntarily do is for pleasure or for self-preservation.” I feel this concept is heavily shown through the fact that all human beings react differently if put in the same situation. This shows that even though one's environment will be the same as someone else’s, people's personality determines the morals and decisions made by said individual. For example, some criminals have safe surroundings and good environments, but still make the conscious decision to commit a felony.…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First, Thomas Hobbes describes the state of nature and human beings as solely wanting power over one another. He states that nature makes humans equal from the start as so nobody is smarter or stronger from the beginning, but by how we allow ourselves to become. According to Hobbes, the state of nature has “no common ways of life, no enforced laws or moral rules, and no justice or injustice, for these concepts do not apply” (Hobbes, 66). In this quote he means that there is society would be incapable of existing except with the power of the state. He has the idea that humans would be incapable of governing themselves because eventually everyone would break out into chaos and lose all order they had.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The philosophy of ‘Liberalism’ can encompass a range of different and competing ideas, but can be broadly defined as belief system that places distinct value on the rights and freedoms of the individual and how political power is exercised to uphold those freedoms. Liberalism is often separated into two strands; Classical Liberalism and Social Liberalism. Classical Liberalism, which itself encompasses Economic Liberalism, is a philosophy that concerns itself with the limitation of the power and scope of government and its interference in the free market economy. It promotes the belief that individuals can make decisions that provide the greatest benefit to themselves, and rejects the belief that a government can know what is best for everyone.…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Liberalism is a legal theory that emphasizes individual rights and freedoms over utilitarianism. John Locke is known as one of the key figures in liberalism, and he describes a social contract that would ensure individual rights and an equal relationship between citizens and the government. There are four main themes that are outlines by Brian Tamanaha. Firstly; “the individual is free to the extent that the laws are created democratically. Citizens have thereby consented to, indeed authored, the rules they are obligated to follow.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In order to leave the state of nature individuals must consent to the social contract in order to form a commonwealth. For a social contract to be enacted all members of society must agree to give up certain rights provided in the state of nature to create a civil society that benefits them all. The commonwealth for all three signifies an impartial power which makes the final decisions concerning matters in civil society. For Hobbes the social contract is created because people live in fear that another will harm them in their quest for self-preservation. While Locke believes that a social contract is needed to create an impartial judge because men cannot be trusted not to take justice too far, once the common good is no longer at the forefront.…

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is a paper comparing the Aristotle and Hobbes understandings of human nature. Aristotle states that man is a “political animal”, and that it is thus natural for man to live in a polis. Hobbes disagrees with this understanding of man a political animal, as he claims that man is actually a greedy being that is driven by power. Thus he feels that the natural state of man is a state of war. Although the two disagree initially about the man’s natural state, Aristotle comes to agree with Hobbes’ view since they agree that without a common sense of justice that individuals have no reason to live together.…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes represents one extreme; Goldman strongly refutes Hobbes and finds herself supporting the other extreme, while Locke’s view of human nature fits somewhere in the between the two. Hobbes’ end of the spectrum views humans as sophisticated machines. He makes minimal assumptions in constructing his state of nature, and as a result, Hobbes delivers the strongest and most convincing interpretation of human nature.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All forms of social contract theory ultimately come down to one idea, that being that the individual desire for security and safety, demands fulfillment through a collective agreement. This collective agreement transforms the unaltered human state from the natural, primal state into an organized society. Beginning with Thomas Hobbes, with perhaps the most pessimistic view on the social contract and why it came about. According to Hobbes prior to Social Contract, man lived in the State of Nature. Man’s life in the State of nature was one of fear and selfishness, a chaotic condition of constant fear.…

    • 1704 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The two writings, On the State of Nature by Thomas Hobbes, and Lord of the Flies by William Golding are two very intellectual ways of thinking. The two writings have some different viewpoints and understandings. Although there are some differences between both writings, the basis of their writings are focused around the idea that politics, and laws are formed from a social contract. Social contracts are a form of government when no government is officially appointed, leaving the decision of who should be in power up to the people. Thomas Hobbes stated, “Hereby it is manifest, that during the time men live without a common power to keep them all in awe, they are in that condition which is called war; and…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes, on the other hand, thinks that people only care about power and appetite. We want certain things and we want to get power to get those things. Hobbes’ view is that there is no such thing as responsibility. Moreover, we look at the state of nature. Locke stated that the state of nature is the state of no government; law that obliges everyone and reason.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    CONTRACTARIANISM INTRODUCTION “Any of the various theories that justify moral principles and political choices because they depend on a social contract involving certain ideal conditions. A general ethical theory, that individuals make the right choices under a hypothetical social contract.” (www.dictionary.com) “Contractarianism, which stems from the Hobbesian line of social contract thought, holds that persons are primarily self-interested, and that a rational assessment of the best strategy for attaining the maximization of their self-interest will lead them to act morally (where the moral norms are determined by the maximization of joint interest) and to consent to governmental authority. Contractualism, which stems from the Kantian…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Hobbes cared about maximizing liberty, defining social justice, and knowing how to divide the limits of the government power. The process of the state of nature is formed by a community and a government. People would view him as a “Psychological egoist” he was over the top with an unrealistic view of human nature. In the laws of nature and the social contract, “Hobbes thinks the state of nature is something we ought to avoid, at any cost except our own self presentation” (Thomas Hobbes). Hobbes believed in a social contract and how it would help the government rule the society.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays