Theocratic Family Of Law: The Iranian Legal System

Improved Essays
The next stop on this trip is visiting ancient Persian ruins in Iran. Iran follows a theocratic family of law. Theocratic law is a system of law heavily dependent on religious belief. In Iranian law, assault is listed as a Qisas offense. Offenses of this type have punishments that also include execution. “The Islamic law regards such offenses as acts against the victim and his family and allows for inflicting on a culprit an injury exactly equal to the injury he inflicted on his victim.” (Entessar, 1998) Although retribution is allowed, the Iranian penal code and the Quran, Islamic Holy Book, recommend trying to find forgiveness. In Iran, criminal defendants are innocent until proven guilty. Seeing that Iranian legal system follows theocratic

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The Rule of Law states that the law is a requirement to regulate society, that everyone is consider to be equal under the law, and that people are not ruled by an arbitrary power. As seen in the 2013 case of Sammy Yatim’s death, due to excessive force shown by Toronto police and more importantly officer James Forcillo. Most people would say that the Rule of Law was not applied in this case, due to the fact the fact Forcillo was only sentenced to six years in prison. He was found not guilty of second degree murder and manslaughter, but guilty of attempted murder. Forcillo only spent one night in jail before being Bailed out pending an appeal of the court’s decision.…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Stoning

    • 1767 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Women have been victims of injustice for hundreds of years, but in Pakistan there is a particular form of torture that stands out amongst them all. Stoning is a form of capital punishment known to Pakistan, where a group of people throw stones at a man or women until he or she dies. Unfortunately, women are more often subjected to this form of punishment than men because of their status in society. Stoning is considered a form of execution by torture because it is a lot slower than other forms of execution. In other countries like Afghanistan and Iraq, stoning has been declared illegal, but it is still being practice extra judicially which means it is beyond the action or authority of the court.…

    • 1767 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    DMW: A Rhetorical Approach Human life is the most sacred phenomenon man-kind possesses, for centuries humans have pondered their existence, and its meaning. Every person’s life has an intrinsic value which should never be taken by anyone, including governmental systems. Capital punishment dates back as far as 17th century B.C. During that time the Draconian Code of Athens, the death sentence, was the only punishment for all crimes.…

    • 1985 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Now we move our focus to a completely different geographical area. This case study is in early modern Spain, specifically the Inquisition, and some of the ways they punished people. The Spanish Inquisition was created in 1478 by the Catholic Monarchs, Queen Isabella I of Castile and King Ferdinand II of Aragon. Its main purpose was to maintain the catholic orthodoxy in the realms of Spain.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Background Stephen Chapman was born in Brady, Texas and he grew up in Midland and Austin. He graduated from Harvard University with cum laude and worked for the New Republic. Chapman is currently on the staff of the Chicago Tribune where he writes a column that covers national and international affairs, and appears in some 60 papers across the country. He has also provided articles for Slate, The American Spectator, National Review, The Weekly Standard, The Atlantic, Harper’s, and Reason.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How Is Hammurabi Unfair

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages

    An Eye for an Eye Did you know the famous saying “an eye for an eye” is actually 4,000 years old! Approximately 4 millennia ago, a great king known as Hammurabi conquered the land of Mesopotamia. He then established a very famous set of laws to run his newly-formed empire. However, these laws had extremely harsh and cruel punishments for many criminal acts, such as dismemberment and death.…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hammurabi Era

    • 1310 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It is well known worldwide and in our country of the United States of America that if a civilian commits an act of crime, there will be a consequence to pay. The type of crime that a civilian commit will determine the type of consequence the civilian will have to pay. Most of the consequences here in the United States are tolerable, either by being punished in prison, pay a fine, or the worst one being the death penalty. Now if we take it back to the Babylon King Hammurabi era, they perceived justice in a different way from todays laws and criminal procedures. A phrase mentioned in the code of Hammurabi states, “If a man has destroyed the eye of another free man, his own eye shall be destroyed…”.…

    • 1310 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For years commonly known form of deterrence during the beginning of times which was capital punishment, shaming and torture dominated were established but were being questioned in their effectiveness. Many of the colonist felt that inflicting physical pain or the town spectacle of capital punishment, was not necessary answer for all crimes, neitherless a deterrence ”Anglo-American Elites began to worry that public punishment was doing more harm than good (“Far from preventing crime by terror they excite in… spectators [public punishment] are directly calculated to produce them.”) ” (Perkins,2010, 63). Penitentiaries were introduced with the sole purpose to implement rehabilitation towards an individual through the action of solitary confinement. In solitary confinement, the criminal would seek a religious finding for forgiveness…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, the Rambam criticizes the Karaite argument on the unity of the creator creating a naturally whole legal system, and the unnecessariness of the rabbinic legal tradition. He goes on to claim that their view is an infantile version of the Mutakallimun, who took the basis of this argument and developed it into a theological position, repeatedly referring to the Karaite tradition as “scanty”. Maimonides defends the tradition of the Sages, firm in the belief that the very basis of the interpreted legal tradition whose roots are based in the Torah were put in place to prevent the very thing that the Karaites has caused to occur- namely the en masse confusion and “multiplicity of opinions”. HaLevi’s previously mentioned argument gives…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since earlier times, deviance has been prominent in society. Overtime offenses have gradually been taken more seriously due to a better understanding on the reasoning of crime. Although criminologists theorize the origin of crime, it is still a blurry line on whether the perpetrator should physically be held accountable for his or her life. This ideology can date back to the Code of Hammurabi, where corporate punishment was a form of discipline. Corporate punishment consisted of inflicting any physical pain onto the perpetrator that was measured to the offense.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    America should have torture as a form of punishment. Less crimes would be committed. As for this, with this knowledge being known, crimes such as first degree murder, rape, ect. & instead of shedding the mercy of death to a person who committed such terrible acts, we should rain the misery of life & with this knowledge at hand along with knowledge that this isn’t some threats of barks would bring fear to the sins that make us fear them.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Understanding the basics and the foundation behind Sharia law is not such a difficult task. Accepting it as a reasonable alternative to democracy is a bit more of a stretch for those who have only experienced democratic systems of crime and punishment. Crimes against a religious book are nothing new to Christians and those of any faith. The laws in a modern society of a nation that observes Sharia law seems archaic. Even more difficult to accept are the punishments handed out in accordance with the prescribed hudud punishments that are ‘fixed’ punishments handed out and assigned depending on the crime committed.…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Punishment Philosophy Punishment is seen as one of the pillars of life and society. Yet the view of punishment is deeply intertwined with the different philosophies of punishment that have become norms throughout time. While many see punishment through polarized lenses of retribution and vengeance, it should be utilized as a positive tool towards rehabilitation which in turn turns the heart away from sin.…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Capital Punishment: an Act of Justice or Revenge? To many, executing the offender of a heinous and violent murder is seen as an act of justice and retribution, and is an essential aspect of maintaining moral balance, however, perhaps the stronger and more substantial position is that the death penalty is a barbarous act of revenge, motivated by emotion rather than logic. According to the “Retributive Justice Theory” those who break the law deserve to suffer punishment, and likewise, deserve to be punished in proportion to the crime committed.…

    • 1554 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The judicial power of Sudan’s Constitutional Court is typical of any other of its kind. The court “sits at the apex of the centralized judicial system” (The Republic of Sudan Art. 119). It functions as the “highest court in constitutional maters and has exclusive jurisdiction to adjudicate cases concerning: protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms, resolution of disputes between the different levels of government, and complaints against any act of the Presidency or the National Council of Ministers if the act involves a violation of the decentralized system of government” (REDRESS 10). The court can also “order interim measures to avoid irreparable harm and effectively guarantee rights and freedoms before making a final ruling…and…

    • 1479 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics