Julius Caesar Dramatic Suspense Analysis

Improved Essays
It is surprising but true that audiences or readers would have come to the play knowing the outcome of the battle yet Shakespeare tends to create dramatic suspense and tension. John Summons defines 'dramatic tension' as "how you keep an audience hooked to the story of your play. It is about creating and maintaining an audience's involvement in the 'journey of your play." The playwright achieves this by using dramatic tragedy and twists, structure of the play and the characters and their interactions.
Dramatic suspense and tension are interrelated with dramatic irony where as the audience knows something the characters do not. In fact, this makes the audience anxious to see if the characters find out things in relation to the fate of the tragic hero or if the characters find out too late which is often common. For instance, in act 2, scene 3, the audience knows Antony's future which is how the soothsayer warns him of the turn out. The soothsayer says "If thou dost play with him at any game, thou art sure to lose." This shows that the soothsayer warned Antony not to stay with Caesar as Caesar's fortunes are better than his whereas we, as the audience knows that Antony loses the battle at sea with Caesar.
…show more content…
Conclusively, Shakespeare creates dramatic tension, even though the audience knows the ending, by the more dramatic action progresses, the more political tension as he focuses on both Caesar and Antony who have different ideals. Shakespeare allows the audience to make assumptions based on the way he structured the play, thus the audience will want to see if their assumptions are right by the end of the play especially in relation to flaw of the tragic hero that prevents him from achieving his objective. Also, audiences wait for the characters to learn the truths of the situation and the moment of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    William Shakespeare took the time to write down this comedic play to not only enforce comedic relief but to also show the people of the time how much rumors can destroy or build. Rumors and noting was very emphasized throughout the play and we as readers can definitely tell where the comedy was and where it was serious as like Shakespeare’s other plays. Trials and tribulations go hand in hand when it comes to rumors and noting but throughout the play we can see that each character had a major purpose when detecting the rumors and how to resolve them. For Beatrice and Benedict, it was to find out they truly love each other and as for Hero and Claudio, Claudio had to mourn for the loss of Hero and show his loyalty once again. In the end rumors can be the cause of love and…

    • 1344 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ambiguities found cannot be defined as what Shakespeare’s plays are “about”; they are merely tools that the poet uses. In Henry V, Shakespeare leads his audience to a state of crisis. This altercation between the two possible interpretations of Henry V suggests a “spiritual struggle in Shakespeare that he would spend the rest of his career working through” (Rabkin 62). This struggle in interpretations is found in the problem plays and tragedies. Shakespeare shares this conflict, and he ultimately brings us down into it as we reflect on the plays and performances that lean one way or the other.…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Taking place roughly halfway through the full play, The Murder of Gonzago is a clever device to force action and to lead the audience into questioning what they are watching. To see actors on stage, fooling other actors, is to see a meta-play, leading audience members to consider the truths that have been spoken. In addition, the “play within a play” concept is used structurally to convey meaning in regards to deceit. The subtext that actors could be hired to reveal Claudius alludes to how Shakespeare’s plays are intended to reveal a facet of human truth. Although the play is made-up, the audience members react towards it in some fashion, revealing their own preferences and truths that mere accusations would not achieve.…

    • 1635 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Macbeth Passage Analysis

    • 1050 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One of the motifs is the motif of duplicity. It is used throughout the passage in the beginning with the fact that the predictions cannot be good or bad and in the end of the passage with the paradox. The first mention of it sets up this message of duplicity or how everything has two meanings to it. Nothing can be how it seems. Macbeth is always pretending to be something he is not and in this passage he is pretending to be happy with the recent developments but in his mind he wants more and considering murdering the king.…

    • 1050 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This has been displayed in many plays such as King Lear, Hamlet and Macbeth. The superstition in this play has been used to depict a sense of mystery and menace that hung over Julius Caesar, to the point of success where audiences in which audiences were left in shock to see Caesar ignoring these superstitions as they themselves would have. The characters in the play responded almost consistently throughout the play, warning Caesar of what is to come and watching Caesar dismiss these superstitions. Perhaps the play has a sense of irony around Caesar’s carelessness when considering his final fate. The audience already knows Caesar’s fate, yet they find themselves hoping that perhaps he will listen to the superstitions that were told to him.…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Shakespeare “shows that the real power of acting is not in its illusory ability to raise the dead but in its use of fiction to awaken desire and imagination in the living” (Kietzman 278). Twelfth Night prompts the audience to imagine boys as females on stage, and invokes desire for the cross-dressed Cesario. Cross-dressing was an element that both rationalized and heightened the confusion faced by an audience as they witnessed the tale unfold. Shakespeare’s construction of a play prominently featuring cross-dressing on multiple levels reveals homoerotic ideas latent within the period based on the desire for this type of…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The prominent actions of Fortinbras, directs readers to focus on Hamlet’s hamartia because it ultimately is the cause of his downfall. The readers are able to use Fortinbras to compare with Hamlet and be able to dictate the important personality traits of Hamlet, which Shakespeare tries to highlight. In short, Shakespeare’s Hamlet, Fortinbras is used as a foil to illustrate Hamlet’s traits and not as a valuable character of his own right. Fortinbras mirrors Hamlet’s personality through, familial duty, actions, and vengeances. The plot would not have been noteworthy if Hamlet had not struggled with his tragic flaw: his lack of action, which Fortinbras highlights.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Friar Laurence is a staple of morality in the town of Verona. In being so, both Romeo and Juliet come to him for advice. On the surface, this play seems to explore the idea of this or that: Montague or Capulet, however, the Friar’s presence denotes the theme of duplicity and dubiety. He is in a sense, the middle-man, some believing that even his righteousness is compromised when his actions do not entirely support his beliefs. And it is these actions that set into motion the overall conflict and resolution meaning without Friar Lawrence; the story would have taken a completely different turn.…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    By using these methods Shakespeare is able to present to an audience an environment in which they hold more knowledge than the characters. This is particularly relevant to Cassio and Desdemona who are unknowing of their status as victims. At the beginning of the passage Cassio says to Desdemona “whatever shall become” (Line8) of him he remains in her favour. Considering the ending of the play this carries some irony and emphasises to the reader that the characters do not know the turn the play will take. Another example of dramatic irony in the passage is Desdemona’s assurance that “if I do a vow of friendship, I’ll perform it to the last article” (line21) Shakespeare adds to Desdemona’s character a strong sense of perseverance, different from the sweet and willing wife in Othello’s mind.…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Main characters such as Brutus and Cassius found themselves in trouble after attempting to deceive the crowd of Caesar's intentions. On the opposing side, Antony without giving into lies and outside distractions has ended up with the upper hand against the conspirators. Not only does Shakespeare present the main characters in this battle of good and bad, but also include side characters like the Soothsayer and Calpurnia. Both these characters attempted to help spread the truth, but also told accurate predictions that could’ve prevented disaster. This could show that Shakespeare wanted to show how honesty is skill to work at which also doesn’t guarantee quick results, but depending on whether someone will use it wisely, will provide benefits rather than taking the shortcut of lying.…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays