Theme Of Betrayal In Animal Farm

Improved Essays
George Orwell’s Animal Farm first published in England on the 17th of August 1945. It reflects the events leading up to the Russian revolution of 1917 and the Stalinist era of the Soviet Union. Orwell created a figure who represented the Russian peasants and common working class, known as Boxer. The working class had been betrayed by the Stalinists, similar to Boxer who had also been betrayed by the other animals on the farm.

The ultimate betrayal of the ideals of Animalism was demonstrated by the pig’s continual betrayal of the principles of the rebellion. This betrayal is evident, Napoleon never intended that old animals should be retired at all. Napoleon believed that if they were fed without doing any work, they were a burden to the farm
…show more content…
It is defined by the seven commandments that preach about equality between animals. Boxers belief and contribution for the rebellion started from the very beginning and ended with his dream of a perfect utopia to his death. He had collapsed due to starvation and work overload, which resulted in him having a great injury. At the cowshed, Boxer proves his loyalty and how he is a valuable soldier, by knocking a stable boy unconscious with his mighty hoof in chapter 4. The difference between Boxer and the pigs is that Boxer was not bloodthirsty and was feeling great remorse when he realises he had killed the stable boy, while the pigs did not care about the condition of the boy. Boxer’s mottos such as “I will work harder” reveals his devotion to the animals cause and his desire to make animal farm better than it was. Boxer's other motto “Napoleon is always right” reveals his childlike dependence on an all-knowing leader, in this situation, Napoleon. Even when he collapses after working himself to death over the rebuilding of the windmill on the farm, his first instinct and thought were not about him but about the work and the farm. “It’s my lungs…it does not matter. I think you will be able to finish the windmill without me.” Page 113 chapter 9. Boxers hopes of retiring with Benjamin after the collapse displays the extent of his innocence, since as the reader knows Napoleon has no intention of providing for an old, no-working …show more content…
This doesn’t follow the commandments “all animals are equal" and “no animal shall kill another animal”. Boxer had no idea about his soon to be fate. The pigs were in contact with humans, they had to contact the knackers to come collect Boxer and get rid of him, for the exchange of money. He now was useless to the farm. This breaks the commandment “Whatever goes upon two legs is an enemy.” The saying that is said throughout the storyline “two legs bad, four legs good!” Which is also broken and gets changed later to “four legs good, two legs better!”

These are the 7 commandments, before and after they were changed to suit the pig’s new lifestyle ways.

o What goes upon two legs is an enemy – Two legs better than four o Whatever goes upon four legs, or has wings, is a friend - The pigs ending up thinking any animals who walk on four legs or has wings is inferior. o No animal shall wear clothes - The pigs all ending up wearing clothes o No animal shall sleep in a bed – No animal shall sleep in a bed with sheets o No animal shall drink alcohol – No animal shall drink alcohol to excess o No animal shall kill any other animal – No animal shall kill any other animal without cause o All animals are equal – All animals are equal, but some are more equal than

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Essay-2 CHALLENGE FROM MARGINAL CASES Having gone through the ‘Challenge from Marginal Cases: in the Article “Puppies, Pigs and People”, it seems the author Alastair Norcross is of the view that any mutilation or torture to non-human animals is morally impermissible irrespective of the actions of Fred’s behavior and torture of the animals or slaughtering or mutilation of farmed animals. He argues that there is no difference as the animal is mutilated in either case. In one case Fred tortures his puppies directly to obtain cocoamone for his pleasure whereas in other case farmed animals are slaughtered to cater the need of the people. From the above I feel, Fred is a rare consumer of cocoamone and the way he treats or torture puppies himself in an unorganized way and keep animal…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Four Legs Bad In Russia

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Pages

    “Four legs good, Two legs bad.” (P. 134) This means that animals are good, but humans and human-like creatures are better. It is not a full sentence, but it has a large amount of meaning. It explains how much the pigs are controlling the farm.…

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Korsgaard, who preaches the Neo-Kantian theories of philosophy, also makes a point that living beings, both human and non-human, can have intrinsic moral worth without having high rationality. She argues that humans face the problem of normativity, which emerges because of the reflective structure of human consciousness. Our reflective capacities make us less impulsive and allow us to take decisions in a more matured manner. When we determine whether a particular desire of ours should be reason enough to act on, we engage in a deeper level of reflection. Korsgaard points out that humans face the problem of normativity in a way that non-humans do not, by explaining how a lower animal’s perceptions of the world are its beliefs and its desires and impulses are its will.…

    • 1748 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Haley Price Mid-Term 10-7-15 Prompt 8 Equality of Animals or Peter Singer is a well-known Ethicist who rights about his thoughts that animals and humans should have equal interests. Before deciding to debate this topic, I took the time to read Singer’s “All Animals are Equal”. After reading this I believe that Singer ignored the reality of nature to build his argument; however, one cannot just simply “forget” the irreversible acts of nature. There is a great debate over whether animals should have rights that are equal to human rights. In Singer’s theory, “All Animals are Equal” the principle of equality is given equal consideration to all interests, regardless of actual abilities.…

    • 1713 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In comparison of “All Animals Are Equal and Moral Standing,” the “Value of Lives, and Speciesism” the key differences are based on the values outlined by the writers. In Value of Lives and Speciesism, Frey discusses the importance of animals feel pain and suffer just as humans do, but also admits that there are reasons such as necessary medical research for harming animals. On the other hand, Singer’s All Animals Are Equal focuses on the rights of hemostats in comparison to those who can make intelligent decisions. The question is should non-human animals have rights and how far do those rights reach? Both agree that animals should have rights, but their major differences including, pleasure and pain, hierarchy, consumption, and richness of life.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    But Some Are More Equal Than Others" (118). COMMENT: This showed just how much napoleon has ignored the words of old major. -all the rules seems forgotten as the pigs no longer care about the other animals - Old major’s words and his dream of rebellion while sticking together is also forgotten as Napoleon has the power to do anything. CONCLUDING STATEMENT (try and link points made in paragraph back to…

    • 1513 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To gain control over his people, Napoleon unjustly executes those that disagree with his ideals. After the massacre, “there was a pile of corpses lying before Napoleon’s feet and the air was heavy with the smell of blood,” (Orwell 84). As described in this excerpt, Napoleon does not attempt to hide his corrupt actions, but instead displays them for all to witness. As the other animals observe these acts of violence, their terror forces them into silence and acceptance of Napoleon’s rule. Although some executions were public, others, such as Boxer’s, were kept secret.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why did Animalism fail? In the book Animal Farm by George Orwell, a lot of commotion happened between animals and humans. The animals ran Mr. Jones out of the farm because of Majors dream, after that they made the 7 commandments. Little did the animals know that all of this was going to change over time.…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Throughout each attempt and success of essentially ignoring the seven commandments, the pigs had little to no trouble getting the animals of Animal Farm to go with the flow. The animals always had doubts, but since none of them could read the commandments on the law (except a few, who always read them the wrong way), the animals thought that standing on two legs was ok (only for the pigs), that every animal way equal, except for the higher-standing pigs, that it was ok for the pigs to wear clothes and drink alcohol, and even that it was (eventually) ok for animals to be killed (only by the pigs, of course), even though none of it abided with the original seven…

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Boxer In Animal Farm

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages

    After Snowball was forced out of Animal Farm, Boxer adopted a new motto: “Napoleon is always right.” He decided to put all his trust and opinions in favor of Napoleon because he thought Napoleon was in favor of promoting the belief of Animalism. However, throughout the novella, Boxer was manipulated multiple times which has led him to be unable to fight the good fight for the rest of the animals. An example of Boxer being manipulated was when he decided to believe that the execution of the animals in chapter seven was justified because Napoleon was right. Boxer blindly accepted all of the decisions made by…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In All Animals Are Equal, the philosopher Peter Singer argues that we should extend the basic principle of equality to non-human animals. In order to justify this claim, the author examines the foundations of the basic principle of equality, establishing a moral system that takes into account the equal consideration of interests of living beings. Peter Singer states that in order for a being to have interests at all, one must take into account the capacity of suffering and enjoyment, or in other words, sentience. Throughout this chapter, Singer makes his readers see that if one rejects racism and sexism, one must also reject the idea of giving special consideration to the interests of one species over another one. In this essay, I will firstly reconstruct the arguments used by Singer to arrive at the conclusion that all animals are equal.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    GLOBAL JAYA INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL English Language & Literature HL Extended Essay How Does George Orwell Use Symbolism To Show Us His Ideas On Authoritarianism in his novel “Animal Farm”? Lucas Gramm Candidate Number: 002189-0025 Word Count: 3454…

    • 3453 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The animals that Napoleon kill; confess their crime to him even though they did not commit it. Lastly, Napoleon abuses his power by betraying one of his best friends Boxer. Boxer is a powerful work horse that does almost every task on the farm. Not only does Boxer do more work than any other animal, but he also is the one animal that always says, “If Comrade Napoleon says it than it must be right.” When Boxer says this it is displaying how…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Boxer’s answer to every difficult situation, every setback, was “ I will work harder” (Orwell, 29). This became Boxer’s motto and is repeated throughout the book. It became clear the pigs were more interested in supervising the other animals instead of actually doing farm work. The pigs left the physical labor to the lesser animals.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Student Course Date Singer’s Principle of Equal Consideration of Interest In his seminal work, Animal Liberation, Peter Singer, puts forth the principle of equal consideration of interest in which he argues that for any being that possesses interests, those interests must be considered to be correspondingly morally significant with the identical interests of another being. Singer applies this principle to all sentient beings and uses sentience as the crucial characteristic for admissibility into the moral society (Singer 57). Singer’s argument has been challenged numerous times, this one by Francis and Norman.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays