The Importance Of Ending A Human's Life

Improved Essays
Thinking about the future is something that is inevitable for humans, we always want the best in our lives and always want the best for our loved ones. Sometimes one might look as far as death, yes that does seem very depressing, but we think to that point because we worry abou the pain that might come then. Most people do not want to endure that pain and I have heard many people in my life time say “I just want it to be quick and painless” when speaking about their death. Again this is a dark subject, but the problem is that it is reality and it is in our DNA that we do not want to suffer and experience pain. This brings up the question of: Is it human to end a human's life? And anyone's natural response to that is an immediate gasp followed …show more content…
We can see right in the Ten Commandments that catholics already oppose physician assisted suicide in the commandment of “Thou shalt not kill”. Even in the choice of taking a loved one off of a ventilator there are many questions that one asks themselves in the name of their faith and become very troubled because they watch a mother, father, or child suffer and fade from who they once knew. Lovelle Svart and Brittany Maynard are just two cases in which we can see the results of allowing PAS and giving these people the right to die and they have had positive results. The deaths of these people are not at all beautiful, but through their stories you can see their acceptance of death and how they have become at peace with themselves and their families. Brittany Maynard poses a great question, when speaking on death with dignity, stating “Who has the right to tell me that I don't deserve this choice?” Why should she have to go and sit in a hospital on a machine that is keeping her alive but causing her extreme emotional and physical pain. Dragging her farther and farther away from who she once was, as she may forget who her own mother was even though she is standing right in front of her on the side of her bed. Why should that choice be taken away from someone? Even with having experienced my family having to make decisions like this before, I never …show more content…
It is easy to look at the benefits that would come from making this legal through the utilitarian ethics lense. Physician assisted suicide and right to die becoming legal would be the best outcome for the most amount of people. It is not only beneficial for the patient but also for the patient's family. I know this from experience because I had to watch my grandpa become a man of such anger and listen to him say delirious things that were awful to hear as he sat in the hospital months upon months getting treatment. The grandpa that I once knew and loved became a man that I seemingly didn't know anymore because of what the treatment had done to him. My mother and her siblings decided that they would just let him live out his remaining months that he had with us and eventually this became an issue of right ethics for them. That is because they seemed to wonder if they had made the right decision by doing this. And in the end they found out that they did. My grandpa passed away at peace with himself and his family, just as Brittany Maynard and Lovelle Svart did, although not in the exact same way. Having an experience like this makes me agree with right to die and assisted suicide more than other maybe do, and I do think that if conversations like this are expressed that people

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    There has been many controversies over whether physician ­assisted suicide should be legal or not. Many people believe that it is morally wrong and should be unconstitutional. Individuals who support physician assisted suicide argue that it cuts costs, ends pain and suffering, and is not morally wrong. Physician­ assisted suicide is a controversial procedure that should be accepted, legally and morally as it is cost saving, and eliminates suffering from individual’s lives.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Physician assisted suicide, P.A.S, has been a topic of interest for many years and the argument still stands on whether or not it should be legalized entirely in the United States. A few states, Oregon, Vermont, Washington, California and Montana, have already legalized physician assisted suicide. The state of Oregon passed a Death with Dignity Act in 1996, and was the first state to make Physician assisted suicide legal. There 's an argument on both sides as to whether or not physician assisted suicide is morally right as well as whether it should be legalized throughout the entirety of the United States. There are some people who see the positive side of it; the elderly and sick will no longer be in pain and can be relieved of their suffering. However, on the other hand, if physician assisted suicide is legalized, then it can easily be abused; people can chose to die even if there are ways to treat whatever illness or problem they have. There is also the views and opinions of physicians, as they are the ones performing the procedures. Some physicians are completely comfortable performing the procedure if it is the best option for the patient and is a hundred percent voluntary. Other doctors are morally against it and do not wish to assist the patient’s suicide. Whether or not physician assisted suicide…

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It would be able to bring the ultimate relief to terminally ill patients who suffer from tremendous physical and mental pain. It might also be comforting for their family members, knowing that their loved ones have ceased to suffer. Another benefit is that it might reduce healthcare costs patients, their families and the state need to bear in order to provide continuing medical care since many terminally ill patients receive care at hospices and nursing homes. Alternatively, assisted-suicide is far more cost-effective than long-term medical care. Allowing patients to end their lives in physician-assisted setting could very well spare the patients the traumatic and extreme approaches to end their lives, such as jumping off the bridge or shooting as mentioned in the cases…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For those of us who have not experienced such a thing, we cannot really know what our decision would be. Later in the study, Emanuel and Fairclough found that, 68.2 percent of oncology patients reported that they agree with euthanasia because of “unremitting pain,” while 49.7 percent also said they agree with euthanasia because of “functional debility.” The general public’s opinion also reflects about the same numbers as the oncology patients (Emanuel & Fairclough). It is pretty clear that euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide is a serious thought among terminally ill patients and their families. The public’s perception of physician-assisted suicide would be impacted if they knew the reasons why patients considered physician-assisted suicide to end their own life. If the public put themselves in the shoes of the patient and actually experienced what the patient was feeling, their view would change dramatically and support for physician-assisted suicide would most likely rise. If the patient does not want to endure the pain of their illness any longer, and there is not any medication that can ease their pain, they should not be forced to experience it any…

    • 1539 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Pros Of Assisted Suicide

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Considering all the housing payments from nursing homes, medical bills, physical therapy, and another other assistance, the total cost to maintain what most would consider a poor quality of life is pretty high. It can be difficult to truly see the benefits of assisted suicide until you or a family member or close friend is put in a situation where the inevitable is the only option. Having a way to end the suffering would not only benefit the patient but also the family and friends of the patient. It would allow them to find the peace that their love one passed without enduring the pain of the process. Some would not want their loved ones to watch them deteriorate. They would appreciate being given the opportunity to leave their family and friends with an image and memory of them that is less painful than what it could…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This problem calls into question if and when is killing acceptable. Due to the negative connotation that is associated with death, PAS has gained a bad reputation. Consequently, in regards to the ethics that surround PAS, those who are against the right to die have a much stronger argument. Some of the biggest advocates against the right to die are religious organizations such as the Catholic Church. The Church declares that it is, “fundamentally opposed to the practices, arguing that life is sacred and that killing and suicide are morally, legally, and spiritually wrong” (Facts On File). In addition, followers of the Church claim that these type of procedures defies the Bible’s Ten Commandments, the sixth of which orders, “Thou shalt not kill.” Likewise, the Episcopal Church asserts, “It is morally wrong and unacceptable to intentionally take a human life” (Sharp 8). Even though majority of opposers are religious groups, all denominations aside, there are still many who strongly disagree with allowing PAS. In a broadcasted discussion about twenty-nine year old, Brittany Maynard, who chose to die after receiving a diagnosis of terminal brain cancer, Mary Carter Waren, Professor of Ethics at Florida International University, argued that suicide is a choice of autonomy that is not beneficial for society. Waren reasons, “Life is the most important value we have. So, I would say the process that allowed for her [Maynard] to do that, is not a process that helps us as a society because it’s a highly individual decision that makes it look like you don’t need community...hope is a primary human value and I think suicide in general says to the community that life is not worth living, that the community is not enough, that there is no hope” (Viewpoint). Similar to Waren’s beliefs, the Family Research Council (FRC) describes assisted-death as inhumane, contending that any reasonable…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We know that people believe that if they call for help there going receive a large amount of money. The questions is are you going do it for money or the inside of your heart. Physician assisted suicide it's promoted among the issues that define por professional norms and codes of ethic. American college of physician of the society of internal medicine does not support the legalization would undermine the patient's of physician assisted suicide. The routine practice of physician assisted suicide raises serious ethical and other concern. Legislation would undermine the patient's physical relationship and the trust necessary to sustain it; alter the medical profession role in society; and endanger the value our society places in lives of disabled, incompetent and vulnerable…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The decision on whether or not physician-assisted suicide should be legal could be based off of one thing: the cost. According to slate.com, “Seconal costs about $125 for a lethal 10 gram dose, which comes in the form of 100 individual caplets.” As proven by the statistic, the pills for assisted death are much cheaper than the cost to treat cancer. In an article on takepart.com, it says, “Of the 12 drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration for various cancer conditions in 2012, 11 were priced about $100,000 for a year of treatment.” The price for cancer treatment is 800x the amount of an assisted death. Many people probably view this as a pro of assisted death and would lean towards this option due to the fact that it is much less expensive. However, because it is very inexpensive, more individuals will want to take the easy and cheaper way out. They may think, “Why pay thousands of dollars when I can pay a little over one-hundred and be done?” This is not the mindset one should have though. A person should hopefully want to continue living and this decision should not be changed due to the fact taking a few drugs will cost less than the treatment to stay…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I take an objective stance in regard to the morality and justification of physician-assisted suicide. I believe physician-assisted suicide should be only limited to terminally-ill patients that have a medical prognosis of less than six months left to live and/or have tried all possible medical treatments prior, but with no success to cure their illness. Subjecting people to prolonged pain and suffering is never justified because we would be preventing them from having control over the quality of life. It’s not right to make them endure the deterioration of their health. Death is imminent, so there’s no point in extending their misery and pain. I believe if an individual’s condition is terminal, which will result in their inevitable death, then the concept of the sacredness of life is…

    • 1318 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The controversy over this extensive issue is somewhat difficult to understand if you are not a terminally ill patient. It is hard to understand the pain someone may be going through. Until you know exactly how they feel and if they want to end their own life or not, no one should be allowed to tell them they can’t and that they are morally wrong. It is their decision and their decision alone. Physician-assisted suicide is only a way to end a patient’s life is pain and suffering, and as long as they end their life themselves, there is nothing wrong with…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This issue truly affects everyone in today’s society, especially Americans. With more and more states starting to legalize assisted suicide there are more debates and questions that develop. California is the latest state to pass the law, and later on this year it will be signed into action. Of course with any other law there are strict guidelines that go along with assisted suicide. The law will permit physicians to provide lethal prescriptions to mentally capable adults who have been diagnosed with a terminal illness and that will pass within six months (McGreevy). The Governor of California Jerry Brown really put himself in patients shoes when he himself had been diagnosed with an illness. Deciding to pass the law he voiced that this…

    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    People have the right to make "important decisions about their lives for themselves according to their own values or conceptions of a good life, and in being left free to act on these decisions" (Brock 227). This allows people to take responsibility over their own lives as long as the person can make decisions. “For many patients near death, maintaining the quality of one’s life, avoiding great suffering, maintaining one’s dignity, and insuring that others remember us as we wish them to become of paramount importance and outweigh merely extending one’s life” (Brock 227. Life is about quality rather than quantity. Euthanasia is highly subjective; therefore, if it was legalized, then the law should not be very specific about the type of situation that euthanasia is permitted for a patient. It is important that the final decision of the situation be left up to the individual, their family, and/or their…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If death is destined due to sickness, then the patient should be able to decide whether they want a peaceful death or a painful death. Patients who are suffering from an incurable disease, or any kind of disability do not deserve to suffer and legalizing euthanasia can help cure their suffering since not many want to live after a period of time when the patient and the doctor knows that it is too late and nothing further can be done to improve the patient’s condition, or relieve their pain. She could not end her life on her own terms, so instead she suffered: a crippling stroke; massive blood loss after an angiogram; dialysis; constant hospitalization; and mistreatment by staff. Month after month, she sank further into despair (Hayes). This excerpt is from an article where its author Mathew Hayes describes the condition and suffering that his grandmother had to go through before she reached the end of it. As it is described in the article, it was very hard for his grandmother to go through pain and treatments that brought more pain. Finally when her illness reached its max her body shut down before she could even say her last good bye to the family and friends. Now it would have been much different if euthanasia was legalized in the United States, Hayes grandmother could have had some happy days before she can peacefully let go of her…

    • 1301 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From a religious view, God values all human life, therefore a premature death by physician assisted suicide would not be morally right. However, human suffering also requires mercy and Brittany would definitely be subject to intense suffering in the days to come. God is the sovereign authority and it would be inappropriate for a human to take control and end one’s life. Human life is valuable to the last day and at times suffering can be the primer for God’s amazing work (Geisler, 2010). For a Christian, the act of determining the correct ethical action is found in the Bible. The Bible and prayer offer the only acceptable guidance to determine a morally appropriate…

    • 1519 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On the morning of November 1, a young woman named Brittany Maynard ended her life in Oregon. Her diagnosis was brain cancer; doctors told her she had several years to live. Unfortunately, after further tests doctors informed her that she had about 6 months to live. She decided that she would choose to end her life after the pain of her condition became unbearable. She stated that being able to choose when to die allowed her to live (Slotnik). Many cases similar to Brittany’s exist all over the country. Many circumstances make every situation unique to the patient. However, many of these situations have one difference in common: they did not all legally have a choice. Euthanasia should be legal. Euthanasia gives people like Brittney a choice…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays