The topic Animals and Humans is purposely chosen for our personal interests of facts documented; therefore, it was after we surveyed, questioned, read and review this article topic that, we discovered a format to summarize the article from author’s source and tasks doctors whom managed to reveal data within their journals of experimental psychology and prompt the reader to retain interest and knowledge of the topic identify the influence of daily interactions for behavior with social affiliation. Now, that we have your attention, you may grasp an interest too. First, this paper project will address the research question in summary and also, it will provide responses to concerns of interest.
From this article we can infer the affiliate assist …show more content…
a) How does the research question address the article?
The research question does address the article; clearly, each of the authors journal provide how, “theories of prosocial behavior among humans and non-humans social interactive behaviors has a greater emphasis placed on the role of social affiliation in motivating aid, particularly during everyday interpersonal contexts.”
b) Why was this research carried out?
The research was carried out in order to reveal, the methods and purpose for studies prediction and interpretation of the preference to assist sad and or happy targets social partners; seen as, “mood maintenance mechanisms,” although, theories of human altruism suggest that “helping results from an evolved tendency in care giving mammals to respond to distress or need with empathy and sympathy.”
4. Who were the participants and what type of procedure did they undergo?
The type of procedure that they underwent was a Hypothetical interaction Task.
The participants who underwent this test were Brosan& de Waal,2002; Seyfarth, 1977; Tobby & …show more content…
7. How did the article enhance your knowledge of the theoretical perspective?
We (humans) are more closed to animal attitudes that we could think. We follow certain codes of interpersonal conduct, which our closest ancestors of evolution such as the monkeys also do to interact with each other. To be more specific this study makes a comparison of both humans and primates, who are more likely to provide support to others for social affiliation reasons. In other words, humans decide to help those with better emotional display in order to have a greater possibility of empathy which is necessary for success in the group-life.
This article also make us to analyze why sometimes we feel that during a bad day everything goes wrong and the answer to that may be found paying attention to the attitude that we project to others, who seeing our little positive attitude simply decide to avoid us and escape from a uncomfortable
From this article we can infer the affiliate assist …show more content…
a) How does the research question address the article?
The research question does address the article; clearly, each of the authors journal provide how, “theories of prosocial behavior among humans and non-humans social interactive behaviors has a greater emphasis placed on the role of social affiliation in motivating aid, particularly during everyday interpersonal contexts.”
b) Why was this research carried out?
The research was carried out in order to reveal, the methods and purpose for studies prediction and interpretation of the preference to assist sad and or happy targets social partners; seen as, “mood maintenance mechanisms,” although, theories of human altruism suggest that “helping results from an evolved tendency in care giving mammals to respond to distress or need with empathy and sympathy.”
4. Who were the participants and what type of procedure did they undergo?
The type of procedure that they underwent was a Hypothetical interaction Task.
The participants who underwent this test were Brosan& de Waal,2002; Seyfarth, 1977; Tobby & …show more content…
7. How did the article enhance your knowledge of the theoretical perspective?
We (humans) are more closed to animal attitudes that we could think. We follow certain codes of interpersonal conduct, which our closest ancestors of evolution such as the monkeys also do to interact with each other. To be more specific this study makes a comparison of both humans and primates, who are more likely to provide support to others for social affiliation reasons. In other words, humans decide to help those with better emotional display in order to have a greater possibility of empathy which is necessary for success in the group-life.
This article also make us to analyze why sometimes we feel that during a bad day everything goes wrong and the answer to that may be found paying attention to the attitude that we project to others, who seeing our little positive attitude simply decide to avoid us and escape from a uncomfortable