The structural approach gives the practitioner a concrete conceptual map about what should be happening in a family if it is to be functional; it also provides maps about what is awry in the family if it is considered to by dysfunctional (Becvar & Becvar). A concrete conceptual map is a tool for organizing and representing knowledge. The map also helps define the relationship between concepts indicated by a connecting line linking two concepts. I also think that the conceptual map helps determine the structure of the family if the family is roughly dysfunction, or functional. When I viewed my family, the structure of the family seems functional at certain points, where the relationship between the siblings is pretty good, when it is time to
…show more content…
193). When there is no effective communication, their become behavior problems within the system. There are researchers that focus on the communication approach and how it functions with family therapy. Essential to the focus of this theory/ approach are the redundant patterns of communication and interaction within and between systems (Becvar & Becvar). A redundant pattern of communication and interaction from my understanding seems as though a pattern that is usually characterized by verbosity or unnecessary repetition in expressing ideas. The earliest researchers such as Don D. Jackson one of the earliest researchers in the area of communication theory who joined Bateson’s Palo Alto research team in 1954, he also had other researchers which study schizophrenic communication. When the theorists study the schizophrenic communication it helps them understand an overall concept of communication approach. Jackson’s focus on relationships also led to his delineation of the symmetrical and complementary communication patterns originally describe by Bateson (Becvar & Becvar, p. 194). The other researchers are John H.Weakland who is also a member of the Bateson group, which also focus on the observation of human communication in general. Paul …show more content…
207). The common assumptions would consider something that involves individuals assume to be the case, even without proof. The natures of people go through assuming things, but that is a part of nature. A conceptual framework is defined as a worldview or a set of assumption about the world according to which similarities and differences are punctuated. When the worldview starts to have an assumption, it becomes a problematic problem. According to this theory, therefore, the so-called problem is a problem only from a frame of references that do define it (Becvar & Becvar). Once a problem has been defined therefore a solution becomes a problem in most cases that will need to be resolved from my perspective. Strategic therapists are concerned with the conceptual framework of their clients (Becvar & Becvar, p. 210). Therapists are concerned because most of the information are assumptions and research. The Milan approach to family therapy has been called systemic in the tradition of Bateson’s circular epistemology (Becvar & Becvar). What I am trying to understand is the step of Bateson circular epistemology and how does it connect with family. How I view my family it’s maybe a little dysfunctional, as young adults living in the house with my parents, they still treat me like a child, sometimes I will make assumptions
193). When there is no effective communication, their become behavior problems within the system. There are researchers that focus on the communication approach and how it functions with family therapy. Essential to the focus of this theory/ approach are the redundant patterns of communication and interaction within and between systems (Becvar & Becvar). A redundant pattern of communication and interaction from my understanding seems as though a pattern that is usually characterized by verbosity or unnecessary repetition in expressing ideas. The earliest researchers such as Don D. Jackson one of the earliest researchers in the area of communication theory who joined Bateson’s Palo Alto research team in 1954, he also had other researchers which study schizophrenic communication. When the theorists study the schizophrenic communication it helps them understand an overall concept of communication approach. Jackson’s focus on relationships also led to his delineation of the symmetrical and complementary communication patterns originally describe by Bateson (Becvar & Becvar, p. 194). The other researchers are John H.Weakland who is also a member of the Bateson group, which also focus on the observation of human communication in general. Paul …show more content…
207). The common assumptions would consider something that involves individuals assume to be the case, even without proof. The natures of people go through assuming things, but that is a part of nature. A conceptual framework is defined as a worldview or a set of assumption about the world according to which similarities and differences are punctuated. When the worldview starts to have an assumption, it becomes a problematic problem. According to this theory, therefore, the so-called problem is a problem only from a frame of references that do define it (Becvar & Becvar). Once a problem has been defined therefore a solution becomes a problem in most cases that will need to be resolved from my perspective. Strategic therapists are concerned with the conceptual framework of their clients (Becvar & Becvar, p. 210). Therapists are concerned because most of the information are assumptions and research. The Milan approach to family therapy has been called systemic in the tradition of Bateson’s circular epistemology (Becvar & Becvar). What I am trying to understand is the step of Bateson circular epistemology and how does it connect with family. How I view my family it’s maybe a little dysfunctional, as young adults living in the house with my parents, they still treat me like a child, sometimes I will make assumptions