The State Of Nature Human Conflict Essay

921 Words Sep 17th, 2016 4 Pages
The state of nature Human Conflict was a structure used in political philosophy by most of these philosophers, like Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. Human Conflict is a representation of the human being a part of the society or in a more current state. Thomas Hobbes and John Locke, both had their own outlook on human conflict in political state. The state of nature is a concept used in moral and political philosophy, religion, social contract theories and international law to denote the hypothetical conditions of what the lives of people might have been like before societies came into existence.
Looking how each of these philosophers looked at a social contract, both Hobbes and Locke had different views on a social contract then we believe it to be. Social contract is how people decide to have a government and talks about how much authority can the government have over the people. Some similar are to prevent violence against fellow citizens. For Tomas Hobbes, this means curbing the natural state of chaos. For John Locke, this means preventing any and all violations of individual rights.
Thomas Hobbes had some input on how the government is ran now. When it comes to philosophy, he made a range of materialist, nominalist, and empiricist views against Cartesian and Aristotelian alternatives. His main concern is the problem of social and political order: how human beings can live together in peace and avoid the danger and fear of civil conflict. Hobbes wrote the book, “Leviathan”…

Related Documents