The Provocative Autism Of Personhood Analysis

Improved Essays
As we have seen, animals have more in common with humans than previously thought. They are able to use higher-level functions such as memory that were previously believed that only people could use. However, some would argue that only some animal species have this, and that there should be a ranking system of what animals should receive moral standing. Karen Davis mentioned in her article, The Provocative Elitism of “Personhood” for Nonhuman Creatures in Animal Advocacy Parlance and Polemics, “ranking animals according to a cognitive scale of intelligence is an aspect of cross-species comparisons that should be avoided” (Davis). With this model it would ultimately lead to people not caring much about animals that are deemed unintelligent

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    However, it is evident from the justification given on various situations to claim higher moral status of human on some description of rationality as the morally relevant difference between humans and animals will fail. In the absence of desired answer to the argument on marginal cases, it will not be able to prove that such difference is morally relevant to the status of animals as moral patients as against of moral…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For the purposes of this discussion, to claim that humans have a superior ethical status to animals is the same thing as declaring that it is morally right to give the interest of humans greater weight than those of animals in deciding how to behave. On the other hand, one may argue that it is generally wrong to kill humans, but not animals, because humans are rational and animals aren’t. Along with that, one may claim that the suffering of animals counts less than the suffering of humans because humans are rational, and animals are not. With that being said, lets define what it means to consider what philosophers refer to as ‘marginal cases’. Marginal cases involve whatever kind and level of rationality that is selected by justifying the attribution of superior moral status to…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In his essay, “Speciesism and the Equality of Animals,” Peter Singer argues that the standard for having a right to get equal consideration as others is the species’ “capacity for suffering and enjoyment” (205), and therefore, a species which satisfies the standard should be protected from speciesism. Speciesism is “a prejudice or attitude of bias toward the interests of members of one’s own species and against those of members of other species” (204). Singer states that many people’s voices arguing that intelligence cannot justify racism and sexism bring speciesism towards animals into…

    • 93 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Ten Trusts Analysis

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages

    We must respect these creatures because we are just like them. Goodall describes a time in her life at a university where the professors would tell her that animals didn’t have personalities. They would also tell her that animals weren’t supposed to have names, and Goodall found this outrageous. (Goodall 21) Goodall made animal emotions a legitimate area for scientific investigation, because she always believed all species are alike.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After a three year old boy fell into the gorilla encloser at the Cincinnati Zoo, a gorilla grabbed ahold of the boy and dragged him through the water. The gorilla was shot by zoo keepers in order to rescue the boy who was not seriously injured. The gorilla, Harambe, was a western lowland gorilla which is a critically endangered species. Animal rights groups are pressing for an investigation of the zoo because they claim the zoo violated the Animal Welfare Act (Dodley). Was killing the gorilla to the save the boy’s life the right thing to do?…

    • 1463 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Herzog, Hal. ‘Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat: Why it’s so hard to think Straight about Animals”. New York, NY, Harper Perennial, 2010. Hal Herzog focuses on the ethically inconsistent views that prevail in commonly held attitudes toward animals. The author suggests that moral incoherence is hardwired into the thinking of our species as a random by-product of evolution.…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Say that a dog is killed in a hit-and-run incident; the car runs the poor animal over and soon flees the scene without any care about the animal laying lifelessly on the street—an animal that could have belonged to a loving family who treated the animal as a family member. In a situation like that—we as humans have a moral obligation to pull off to the side of the road and make sure that the animal is okay or to call the owners and inform them of what has happened to their pet but instead we walk away when an animal feels pain or is injured. The reason why things like this happen is because it is basic human nature to see non-human organisms as lesser beings and we, as a whole, tend to feel entirely superior to those who are not as intelligent or complex. The lack of concern for how we test, mistreat and abuse these animals’ cause a lot of issues for those who work towards getting animals equal rights.…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    PHI 1000 Fall 2016 Prof. Drain Essay #2 Thoughts on Thought After examining the several angles to the issue of animal cognition, it is my conclusion that non-human animals are in fact capable of thought. Although humans certainly display a superior cognitive ability, I believe the cognition of animals is not of an entirely different type, and that whatever difference remains is simply one of degree. While Davidson and Descartes tend to argue that language is a necessary component for rational creatures, Hobbes and Searle give non-human creatures more “cognitive credit,” citing their ability perceive, and to have and correct beliefs, as proof of being conscious, thinking, beings. Pointing to the immense biological similarities between humans…

    • 1802 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Contrast Between Animality and Humanity in The Island of Doctor Moreau and Life of Pi One of the major cultural anxieties that prevails in society is the relationship between humans and animals and the distinction between humanity and animality. Humans are often depicted as being a higher form of animal, most commonly induced by religious practices. However, upon isolation or fear of death, the human thought process tends to revert to what is associated to animal-like behaviour. Humans tend to separate themselves from animal life forms as animals are seen as vicious, brutish and capable of committing acts that humans refrain from. Because of this cultural anxiety, much of literature embodies the ideology of animality and humanity and the…

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In comparison of “All Animals Are Equal and Moral Standing,” the “Value of Lives, and Speciesism” the key differences are based on the values outlined by the writers. In Value of Lives and Speciesism, Frey discusses the importance of animals feel pain and suffer just as humans do, but also admits that there are reasons such as necessary medical research for harming animals. On the other hand, Singer’s All Animals Are Equal focuses on the rights of hemostats in comparison to those who can make intelligent decisions. The question is should non-human animals have rights and how far do those rights reach? Both agree that animals should have rights, but their major differences including, pleasure and pain, hierarchy, consumption, and richness of life.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In All Animals Are Equal, the philosopher Peter Singer argues that we should extend the basic principle of equality to non-human animals. In order to justify this claim, the author examines the foundations of the basic principle of equality, establishing a moral system that takes into account the equal consideration of interests of living beings. Peter Singer states that in order for a being to have interests at all, one must take into account the capacity of suffering and enjoyment, or in other words, sentience. Throughout this chapter, Singer makes his readers see that if one rejects racism and sexism, one must also reject the idea of giving special consideration to the interests of one species over another one. In this essay, I will firstly reconstruct the arguments used by Singer to arrive at the conclusion that all animals are equal.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Proctor argues that since humans and animals both have the ability to feel positive and negative emotions, they both deserve the respect and the right to not be treated cruelly. Marian Stamp Dawkins expands on the idea that animals deserve to be treated without cruelty in “The Science of Animal Suffering.” Dawkins addresses humanity’s moral obligation to treat animals with dignity and explains how humans can accomplish this different relationship with animals. Robert Garner’s article, “In Defence of Animal Sentience: A Critique of Cochrane’s Liberty Thesis,” furthers the debate on animal rights to include not only the right to not suffer, but also include the right to not be used in any circumstance. Animal rights may only be fully achieved once humans recognize animals’ dignity as living beings.…

    • 2019 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethics is defined as Rules of behavior based on ideas about what is morally good and bad. I believe it is unethical for humans to cause pain to animals unless strictly for consumption or vital purposes. I believe it is morally right for animals to have a certain level of protection against animal cruelty. People argue that animals do not have the autonomy that human beings have and there for should not be provided rights. Such people believe that animals were only placed on Earth strictly for human use, that they cannot be rational or experience emotions, and lack autonomy.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Sara D'Esposito Professor Mary Pollock JSEM Essay 2 17 October 2017 The Relationship Between Animal and Man The article "Why Look At Animals" by John Berger is very engrossing in a way that it grabs the attention of the reader and brings one such thought. In the article, Berger thoroughly studies the gap between a man depending on an animal. He argues that humans have moved to a higher position above animals, and explains that this is because we as humans have an ability to surpass the range of our planet's natural environment. Berger brings attention to the fact that in earlier times when we first recognized animals, they were only seen simply as clothing, or a pair of horns, and things of this nature.…

    • 1975 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ethical Argument In Animal Welfare

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 10 Works Cited

    Many people concern on what is right and wrong for animal treatment. These arguments are a major issue because many different views and beliefs of people reflect on them. Manly fighting and understanding who has the right over animals is the major concept. Since animals can not speak and choose for their own actions, many people believe that a truthful owner should have the say on what is right for their animal through their beliefs. No matter what regulations are set both sides of the argument will never be satisfied on how humans treat animals.…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 10 Works Cited
    Great Essays