The Pros And Cons Of Pardons

Decent Essays
Pardons are granted to criminals by people high up in the government. Pardons are generally accepted openly by the people being pardoned however, there are some instances where the pardon is not wanted. For instance in 1963 protesters were arrested for not having a permit and when they were pardoned in 2009 they did not want it. The main reason was because they wanted them being arrested for what they were fighting for to be a mark for all to see. Their arrest showed their hardships and determination to do what was right and make a change. Some were so against it that they pleaded to keep what they did as a misdemeanor.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The first article is written by Cyndy Caravelis, Ted Chiricos, and William Bales (2011) called “Static and Dynamic Indicators of Minority Treat in Sentencing Outcomes: A Multi-Level Analysis” and the second article is called “Sentencing with Discretion:Crack Cocaine Sentencing after Booker” by Ryan S. King and Marc Mauer in 2006. In addition, the last article is by Mona Lynch and Marisa Omori (2014) called “Legal Change and Sentencing Norms in the Wake of Booker: The Impact of Time and Place on Drug Trafficking Cases in Federal Court” from the Law and Society Review. Summary Caravelis, Chiricos, and Bales (2011) examines the “Habitual Offender” using a hierarchical generalized linear modeling to look at the direct effects of race using static…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As we have learned from our experiences - and as others have observed as well - unwinding mass incarceration requires much more than stopping current practices or reversing course by mass commutations and early release programs. Those most heavily involved in the criminal justice system will not succeed without the assistance of programs that provide services, discipline, and structure to guide their reintegration into society prior to and after their release. This will require a large, expensive, and politically challenging investment in an infrastructure of community-based correctional facilities throughout the country and especially near communities that receive a disproportionate share of returning prisoners. Ideally, the centers will be…

    • 208 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Felon disenfranchisement is a common practice in the United States and occurs when incarcerated felons and ex-felons are denied certain rights, specifically their right to vote. Felonies vary between violent and nonviolent crimes and are considered to be more serious than misdemeanors. Depending on the crime and the state, conviction of a felony can lead to a minimum of one year in prison. Despite the crime and conviction, the question of whether or not an incarcerated felon or ex-felon has the right to vote is important to examine. While felon disenfranchisement laws are left to be decided by each individual state, the Supreme Court has upheld the view that felon disenfranchisement is constitutional yet has not provided a justification for…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    4) The execution of Crips co-founder Stanley Tookie Williams caused a considerable amount of controversy, as recounted in the case study “Redemption and Capital Punishment” in the textbook. The execution of Williams was not controversial because he was considered of having been innocent of the crimes he was convicted of or that capital punishment was necessarily too severe for his crimes (for he had been convicted of murdering several people), but rather because he was considered to have repented of his past and made some measure of atonement for the evils of his past. Thus, many believed that some measure of clemency was in order, that to execute a man who had totally repudiated his former life and worked to do good to make up for it would…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Felon disenfranchisement has been in practice for centuries, dating back to colonial times (Carter 45). It has been a very controversial topic that is still debated today due to morals and legal understandings. President Jimmy Carter defined disenfranchisement as denying a person the right to vote. Therefore, felon disenfranchisement refers to depriving felons their right to vote, at least temporarily (Carter 45). The United States Constitution and its interpretation has been a key aspect that is considered in determining one’s opinion on felons’ voting rights.…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Pardoner's Case Study

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The Pardoner places his own body outside of normality as a sign of the supernatural, but Burger's response to the kissing the reluc incident is to exonerate the Pardoner by downplaying the Pardoner's action, while harshly reprimanding the Host's reaction. Burger states that for while the Pardoner's exaggerated gestures provoke even stronger policing efforts, the Host's extreme assertion of authority and normality attract notice as constructed acts. The Host's moral outrage invokes authoritative signs absent in the Pardoner's presentation of himself. Burger paints the Pardoner as a flamboyant personality absent of real malice who makes exaggerated gestures in an attempt to carve a rightful space for his voice. On the other hand, the Host…

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is 34% more rearrests than those kept in the youth justice system. Adult prisons don’t help deter teens from committing crimes again. It provides less rehabilitation. It’s not the place for juveniles to grow maturely. These juveniles don’t have a strong mind to overcome the hardships in adult prisons.…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Pardoner’s greatest guilt comes from the sin of greed, even though his tale is focused around how horrible the sin is. In his prologue he says, "I preach for nothing but the greed of gain" (Beers 129). His only goal in making others repent is…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    God first loved us when we were still sinners and Jesus died for us while we were still His enemies (Romans 5:8). In order to maintain balance, God knew that tough laws (despite a human’s age) needed to be enacted due to the sinful nature of humankind. The Bible subscribes to a list of offenses with the mandated punishments set forth by God. Restorative Justice seeks to lace mercy with justice, remedy damage, re-establish dignity and re-integrate all who have been estranged and/or wounded; however, on the other side of the coin, does the focus on restorative justice (criminal rights) outweigh the rights of victims and their families? Being a child and senior advocate, this student/advocate has reviewed and interviewed offenders and the families…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Pardon Petitions

    • 154 Words
    • 1 Pages

    In the United States, All federal pardon petitions are addressed to the President, who grants or denies the request. Typically, applications for pardons are referred for review and non-binding recommendation by the Office of the Pardon Attorney, an official of the United States Department of Justice. The President may still receive pardons personally, and may grant them at any time. The President need not provide a reason for a pardon, and the courts and the Congress have no legal authority to approve, disapprove, reject, or accept a pardon. In India, President exercises this power as he exercises any other power as per Article 74(1), on the advice of the concerned Minister, i.e., the Home Minister.…

    • 154 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Pardons Can Be Difficult To Receive You often hear about pardons being…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Discretionary parole is the parole that is determined by the paroling authority such as the common parole board or the commissions after a case reviewing with the determination that the inmate can rejoin the community (Schmalleger & Smykla, 2015). On the other hand, a mandatory parole is set by law and requires the state to grant parole when an inmate serves a set period. The main argument for discretionary release is that it provides the prisoners with an incentive to change their ways for the better due to the promise of a reward if they comply. On the other hand, the mandatory parole is argued to be better because it cannot be “gamed” where a prisoner simply acts as if they have changed their ways just to be granted the discretionary parole.…

    • 132 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Restorative justice techniques have existed in indigenous communities for many years, even predating retributive justice practices. The focus on community-based justice and the process of healing was essential for the existence of smaller, cohesive societies. This practice is not limited to smaller groups of people. Restorative justice has grown in popularity within the last half of a century, and the Truth and Reconciliation Commission was on the forefront of the paradigm shift of the way modern civilization views and evaluates our current justice system. Retributive justice is the most common practice today.…

    • 1947 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine someone stuck in a concrete box with only a window as small as about 2 basketballs, and you're just getting angrier and angrier at yourself and everyone. Now imagine sitting in a room with family and counselors talking about what you did wrong, and actually calming yourself down rather than getting frustrated with yourself. Restorative Justice is where you sit down and talking about what you did wrong and how you can change that. Restorative Justice is letting your inner self come out rather than anger with could make things worse. Restorative Justice can help in our world by people open up inside, Become more emotional, and opening up kids mind to help the understand life and how to mature.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Judicial discretion refers to the powers conferred to a judge in the legal system of a given country to determine the direction of a matter presented to them without the interference of preceding or strict regulations that are established by statutes (Bushway et al. 2012). Judicial discretion is assigned by the legal apparatus within a given jurisdiction, meaning that court decisions may be subject to contest through the utilization of higher powers. Judges are supposed to practice the discretion allowances up to the limit specified by the law, failure to which decisions may be subjected to comprehensive vetting. For instance, the practice of discretion may be void judgement decisions in the event of bias, capricious practices, and the exercising…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays