Pardon Petitions

Decent Essays
In the United States, All federal pardon petitions are addressed to the President, who grants or denies the request. Typically, applications for pardons are referred for review and non-binding recommendation by the Office of the Pardon Attorney, an official of the United States
Department of Justice. The President may still receive pardons personally, and may grant them at any time. The President need not provide a reason for a pardon, and the courts and the Congress have no legal authority to approve, disapprove, reject, or accept a pardon. In India, President exercises this power as he exercises any other power as per Article 74(1), on the advice of the concerned Minister, i.e., the Home Minister. The Supreme Court clarified in Maru Ram v.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Fix These Problems Slavery was one of the biggest struggles faced by the United States, tearing the country in half between those who oppose it, and those who support it. There was many conflicts about slavery back in 1860 when both these documents were written. The rights of citizens is more broad than the rights of the states as a whole.…

    • 1601 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of US V. Curtiss

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many people tend to wonder the actual power of the president. Is it just a title? Or is he secretly the most powerful man; much like a dictator? Well, by going back in time to specific court cases that could have swayed either way, one can easily tell that the president has more powers than everyone thinks. Many think that issues involving wars and foreign relations are solely powers given to the President, but these powers can be tested when problems occur that are not clearly stated in his job description.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    FACTS: Petitioner was charged in Florida with breaking and entering with intent to commit a misdemeanor; this offense is a felony in Florida. The petitioner asked the trial court to appoint counsel, but the court denied the request. The petitioner was found guilty and sentenced to 5 years in prison. The petitioner then filed in the Florida Supreme Court for habeas corpus arguing that the refusal of the trial court to appoint counsel denied him of constitutional rights, but was denied the relief. The case before the U.S. Supreme Court is a Writ of Certiorari.…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Commander-in-ChiefThe President is the final authority in military matters and ultimately is responsible for the entire military might of the United State. Foreign AffairsThe President has the right to conduct diplomatic missions and set foreign policy on behalf of the United States.- Executive Clemency. The President has the power to pardon or commute the sentence of convicted criminals. Emergency Power. The President has the ability to declare a 90 day period of Emergency during which he can use the full force of the military without seeking permission from Congress either in the form of a declaration of war or through funding, Veto.…

    • 5175 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    On Friday President Donald Trump pardoned the Arizona sheriff Joe Arpaio from a jail sentence after he was convicted of criminal contempt related to his hard-line tactics for going after undocumented immigrants. The sheriff was said to be practicing racial-profiling in Arizona, during which Arpaio was ordered to stop targeting Latinos for traffic stops and detention. Who is the Arizona sheriff Joe Arpaio and who did he become the “toughest sheriff”? Arpaio, who first took office in 1993, rose to national prominence for his crackdown on illegal immigration, earning the nickname "America's toughest sheriff" along the way. He cultivated that reputation, and as Bolton's order makes clear, he was not going to let anyone tell him what to do.…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Summary Andrew Jackson, the man who set out plans that would usually send men floundering in panic, became a war hero during the War of 1812, shattered the Second Bank of the United States, removed national debt, and dominated over the Supreme Court. Historian and author, Matthew Warshauer of Andrew Jackson and the Politics of Martial Law, Nationalism, Civil Liberties and Partisanship claims that then Major General Andrew Jackson believed it was crucial to declare “martial law and suspend the writ of habeas corpus” in order to win the battle of New Orleans. However, as Washauer claims, by doing so, Andrew Jackson became the first American general to suspend civil liberties. Through this monograph, Washauer tells the tale of Andrew Jackson’s…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    I choose to do my research paper on one of my favorite court cases in American history Miranda vs. Arizona case. I’m choosing this court case because it brings up two amendments that tend to be overlooked by law enforcement comes around and one of the most well-known sayings. First I will be giving a quick background about those two amendments and then I will start talking about the case. The issues about this case involved the fifth and sixth amendment. Let me explain both of these amendments.…

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two Presidencies Theory

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The President of the United States seems to wield immense power; through executive orders and bill vetoing, it often appears that the president has a disproportionate amount of influence. However, other times, the president appears limited in his influence towards policy. Aaron Wildavsky proposed a Two Presidencies theory, which proposes that the president has significant power in relation to foreign policy, but limited power in relation to domestic policy. In reality, it seems that the president has power and influence, albeit checked by different branches and entities, in all areas of government.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The state of Kentucky takes driving under the influence (DUI) seriously. In some cases, DUI charges are eligible for expungement. The process for northern Kentucky DUI expungement varies from case to case with two distinct conditions. The first is an arrest that does not result in a conviction or guilty plea.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his foundational work The Types of Legitimate Domination (1922) Weber attempts to establish a theoretical framework to help understand the nature of political legitimacy and the means by which it is achieved. By observing human relationships and their interaction with both formal and informal institutional structures, he is able to provide a detailed sociological analysis highlighting fundamental differences between several strategies of domination (Weber 1978: 212). In doing so, he establishes three 'pure types ' of legitimate authority based on the type of legitimacy claimed therein; legal-rational authority; traditional authority, and charismatic authority. Each type, according to Weber, endows its ruler with a justifiable right to rule,…

    • 1100 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    President El-Sisi is a man who exhibits the same characteristics possessed by an individual within the rational authority group. In the modern world, every private and public corporation, in addition to voluntary associations, exists a rational authority. However, Weber explains that a rational authority has no connection to the person but rather to the position. This is explained in his article as he writes, “In the case of legal authority, obedience is owed to the legally established impersonal order. It extends to the persons exercising the authority…”…

    • 231 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Writs of Certiorari Merriam-Webster dictionary defines writ of certiorari as a writ of Superior Court to call up record of an inferior court or a body acting in a quasi-judicial capacity. Certiorari is the general method most cases make their way to be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court since it has specific jurisdiction over a very limited range of disputes. For example, the Supreme Court order a lower court to send the record, and it usually hear the cases, if it has national significance and value. However, the court is not under any obligation to hear these cases, unless they have been decided in either a U.S. Court of Appeals or the highest Court in a given state.…

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Why does Jackson believe that even though military authorities have the power to violate constitutional protections in time of war, the courts should not approve their actions? Justice Jackson believes that even though military authorities have the power to violate constitutional protections in time of war, the courts should not approve their actions because the orders could very well be unconstitutional and are not legitimate legislative laws. Jackson argues that it is a military program that is being carried out and states "… He [General DeWitt] issues orders, and they may have a certain authority as military commands, although they may be very bad a constitutional law" (Foner 208).…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Americanization was the period when the United States truly began taking over the Vietnam War. President Lyndon B. Johnson began to release for the first time a juncture of air attacks and during the Americanization, this is when the war begins to escalate to a new different level. The Vietnam War had a great significance in the events that occurred in the United States, this era was a period of development, movements, reforms, protest and great revolt.…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On the other hand the executive, has a right to choose to dissolve the national council, and the laws that have been passed can be checked by the constitutional court. Legislative has influence over judiciary by passing laws which courts have to follow. The reparation of powers is an important factor of the rule of law, and is made important in the constitution. Furthermore, the distinctions between the powers is reflected in the functions must not be exercised by one person. As an example, the president cannot at the same time be a member of the national council, or a judge who is a minister.…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays