After putting all these facts together and actually realizing all the things that went on, I believe that it was correct of Parliament to try and control their fairly young colonies but I believe they tried to impose too much and control too many things. For example, I feel that the Quartering Acts were not good duties to apply to an already rowdy and rebellious colonial organization, this gave Americans yet another reason to sever ties with the motherland. So for that reason and obviously for the over taxing of colonies, some of their actions were justified but not all of them. Specifically, I believe throwing all the tea into Boston Harbor was rather drastic as well as beginning the Boston Massacre. I know most people see it as the troops…
The Boston Massacre was the result of the colonists' frustration with British policies after the French and Indian War ended in 1763. They disliked Parliament's active involvement, and hated the presence of British soldiers, who seemed to be policing the colonists. They also resented the numerous attempts at taxation, such as the Sugar Act and Stamp Act, which Parliament tried to impose on them without their consent. When Parliament would not listen to their verbal protests, the expressions of their discontent became violent. Eventually, the Boston Massacre exploded onto the Boston political scene, and brought the colonies closer to revolution.…
The colonists were not happy and did not believe it was fair . Obviously people, the Patriots, did not wish to have more taxation without representation. Therefore, the colonists were not thrilled about having the Redcoats here. England was sending more British troops in their colony to enforcing more tax laws. The Boston Massacre was an indiscriminate slaughter of American colonists on the night of March 5th, 1770.…
Boston Massacre The Boston Massacre was one of the most important events that have ever taken place in Colonial America. It sparked the start of the Revolutionary War, which caused many of those loyal to Britain to rally with those who wanted freedom, and it was considered a turning point for many colonists, to fight the British. Life back then was hard. The colonists had tried to rebel and as a result; the British Parliament passed many acts that negatively affected the colonist’s everyday lives. Some of these acts were the Townshend Acts.…
The citizens of Boston didn't have guns or swords, they had to use rocks in snowballs, and sticks to fight the soldiers back(“The Boston Massacre of March 5, 1770”). In the text, it states that Mr. Samuel Grey was killed on the spot when a snowball entered his head damaging a large portion of his skull. Soldiers showed no mercy and shot an innocent African American citizen causing death to the man(“The Boston Massacre of March 5, 1770”). If that one drunk soldier wouldn't have used his sword on that little boy, it could've prevented a lot of deaths. Otherwise, they were to blame for the incidents just by using a deadly weapon first.…
Colonists were protesting against the taxes and laws that they did not agree with. As shown in the picture of the Boston Massacre (document 4), British troops reacted to protests with violence. In the Declaration of the Causes and Necessity of Taking up Arms it states, “We are reduced to the alternative of choosing an unconditional submission to the tyranny of irritated (British officials), or resistance by force” (document 9). In this quote it says that the colonists either had to go along with whatever the British wanted or they had to fight back. The American colonists had no other choice than to go to…
The American Revolution started because Britain wanted the Americans to pay taxes for war. These Americans did not want to pay and said that Britain is not doing it for American's benefits. Britain decided to impose laws to get money from the colonists, making them dissatisfied. The Boston Massacre was one of the key events to happen due to British tax laws. Was the Boston Massacre truly a massacre despite five colonists being killed?…
Through propaganda and violent demonstrations, the Sons of Liberty spread the fear. Drawing such as Paul Revere’s Boston Massacre spread lies of justification to be against Parliament, Britain's legislature. It depicts the British soldiers involved as cruel and violent, when in reality, the colonists were the ones who initiated this violence. Propaganda was used to twist the story and draw other colonists in. It was not uncommon for customs officials, tax collectors, and British officials to be threatened with death or to be a victim of tar and feathering.…
Shots were fired, lives were lost, and another leg of the American Revolution began. The Boston Massacre caused the tension within the colonies between the Americans and the British that were stationed in Boston to escalate quickly. The Boston Massacre was a predictable event that was bound to happen, considering that anyone under a mistreating power will respond in a violent manner sooner or later. King George III was becoming increasingly irritated with the colonists response to the taxes that he was imposing, and repealing over and over again. The King began to treat the colonists like they were property and He owned them.(Boston Massacre Historical Society, 2)…
This document was written to the American public, because Bourne believes citizens are creating the social problems during wartime. Bourne seems to be directly responding to laws limiting the freedom of speech of American citizens. He is writing in 1918, just after the introduction of the Espionage Act, which criminalised speaking…
At the beginning of the Revolutionary War, most Americans doubted America’s ability to defeat the British. Although the British held various strengths over the Patriots, America had several key advantages over the British. When the British arrived to fight, they underestimated the resilience, political and military leadership, and strategic capacity of the Patriots. Eventually America triumphed in the Revolutionary War, emerging successful against the daunting British regime. The Patriots secured an honorable victory in the American Revolution due to support from foreign allies, a strong ideological commitment, greater familiarity with the land, and strong political and military leadership.…
2. Zobel, Hiller B. The Boston Massacre. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1970. 3. Allison, Robert.…
To Whom it May Concern at the Boston Gazette: The colonists are to blame for the Boston Massacre, because they have provoked the British to open fire by forming a mob, through taunts, and by the uncertainty of who was saying fire. First, the colonists have attempted to portray an act of violence without any provocation, which got matters complicated. According to the report of Captain Preston, the colonist “[assembled together] to attack the troops, and [they rang] the bells…as the signal for that purpose and not for fire”. Additionally, someone “ [sounded] the alarm bells, [under the normal routine for] fire. This means that the colonists used a normal sign of warning to gather the people to attack the soldiers, for they used an underhanded technique to catch the soldiers off-guard.…
Was the Boston massacre really a massacre? Or was it something else? Consider if the soldiers were justified or not in firing into the crowd? Did they have sufficient cause to fire into the crowd? Before we answer these questions, we need to know what set the stage for this bloodshed or as history calls it “Boston Massacre.”…
Many accounts regarding The Boston Massacre support Samuel Drowne’s interpretation of this event. Samuel Drowne claims he saw a person on the Custom-House balcony holding something that looked like a gun, moments later he saw the gun flash. After shots were fired, the unknown man went back inside, stooping and Drowne then saw a flash from another window. While the shooting in the house was going on, below soldiers were firing in to the crowd in random directions, killing 5 people. Drowne then goes on to describe how the shooting began, Captain Preston said to the soldiers “Damn our bloods!…