Le Guin, on the other hand, seems to suggest that this is not the treason, but rather the duty of the artist; that the real treason of the artist is a refusal to admit the banality of both good and evil without the other, or the terrible boredom of pain without pleasure to contrast it. Through the way in which the narrator builds Omelas, Le Guin shows the reader that it is impossible for a society not to contradict itself, whether it be between the old and the new, the virtuous and that which is not, the good and the bad, or even between those who stay within in it and ultimately those who walk away from
Le Guin, on the other hand, seems to suggest that this is not the treason, but rather the duty of the artist; that the real treason of the artist is a refusal to admit the banality of both good and evil without the other, or the terrible boredom of pain without pleasure to contrast it. Through the way in which the narrator builds Omelas, Le Guin shows the reader that it is impossible for a society not to contradict itself, whether it be between the old and the new, the virtuous and that which is not, the good and the bad, or even between those who stay within in it and ultimately those who walk away from