In Evil And Omnipotence Analysis

Great Essays
One of the most seemingly apparent philosophical questions in the world is regarding the existence of God. The topic has been the cause of much controversy for over a millennium. Within the questioning of God’s existence there are several more philosophical arise+, that ignite just as much argument within philosophical circles. One example is the flawed nature of God’s omnipotence. Mackie believes that, “…unqualified omnipotence cannot be ascribed to any being that continues through time.” In other words, omnipotence is not coherent and it is not possible for any being in our world to have it. In this essay, I will begin with a summarization of Mackie’s reasoning for this belief and then cite my reasoning for believing that his argument, in and of itself, is not a good reason for disbelief in God. Despite the incoherency of God’s omnipotence, the innate nature of God entails that we cannot truly understand him and therefore Mackie’s argument falls apart. …show more content…
Citing traditional theologian doctrine, he points out the contradiction of evil existing in a world created by an entity that is supposedly all good. If God is all good then, he should either create a world with inherently no evil or at the very least do all he can to eliminate evil from the world. Noting the evil that obviously permeates our society, the issue becomes apparent. One solution that a theist could use is to say that God gave us free will and that justifies the evil in our

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The evidential problem of evil determines the degree of how much evil must be a part of the evidence of God’s existence. While on the other hand the logical problem of evil is seen through our own eyes. It bares the question whether God is a perfect because of all wrong taking place in the world. Through these two problems it is hard to even imagine that God is perfect. Through Richard Swinburne’s theodicy (theodicy - an attempt to defend God's omnibenevolence in the face of evil) , one comes to find the case that initially escapes the evidential and logical problems…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his article “Evil and Omnipotence,” J.L. Mackie explores the various adequate and fallacious solutions to the “problem of evil,” a problem in which “God is omnipotent; God is wholly good; and yet evil exists” (p. 119). While Mackie discusses, analyzes, and criticizes many solutions, including “good cannot exist without evil” (p. 120) and “evil is necessary as a means to good” (p. 122), my paper will solely focus on Mackie’s response to the fallacious solution that “evil is due to human free will” (p. 123), which begins “first I must query” on p. 124. This paper will formally extract, justify, critically evaluate, and engage with Mackie’s argument that existence of evil due to free will is erroneous. Mackie describes the free will…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I will explain and evaluate two popular arguments regarding the existence of God, A Scientific Argument for the Existence of God by Robin Collins and The Inductive Argument from Evil Against the Existence of God by William Rowe; then I will discuss how the conclusions are not compatible with one another due to the conflicting structure of the conclusions as well as how one cannot accept both conclusions without compromising one of the arguments. First I will explain the basis of Collins’ argument, which is one of the most frequently used arguments in favor of theism. In A Scientific Argument for the Existence of God, Collins centers around the observation of how finely tuned the physical constants of the universe are to the ability for any form of life to exist, if any of them were to change even the smallest bit then no life would possibly be able to develop not to…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is one prevailing question each of us ask ourselves consistently, “Does God exist?” Even though people’s responses are different, nearly all responses are contingent upon one’s beliefs, experiences, and influences. Despite the lack of knowledge, God is known to be an all-loving, all-powerful, and creator of all things in most communities, but those qualities are often questioned by scientists and philosophers. The existence of God was significantly debated among philosophers during the 18th and 19th centuries, however, each esteemed philosopher had a distinct argument explaining their rationale, while criticizing another’s. In this paper, I will analyze William Paley’s, teleological argument, which is the argument for the existence of…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the two pieces of writing, “A Rose for Emily” and “A Possibility of Evil”, the main characters show a level of superiority in their community. Both Adela Strangeworth and Emily Grierson were raised in a family that thinks they have dominance over the community and continue to demonstrate as they age. But, the authors conceive Adela’s and Emily’s dominance and traditions in two different but still effective ways.…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The existence of God is, and has been, a very highly debated philosophical argument that has bewildered philosophers since even before the age of ‘Enlightenment.’ Many of the different arguments put forth have not adequately proven God’s existence, although, in order to move forward, failed arguments must be studied to ensure that mistakes are not repeated. One such argument is that of Saint Anselm’s Ontological Argument. Anselm’s ontological argument is about the fact that nothing greater than God can be imagined.…

    • 1868 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I will dispute that Anselm’s ontological argument is dependent on Anselm’s personal faith in God. My argument lies within the premises that Anselm offers, it would not be rationally acceptable to create content of a maximally perfect being unless the person already accepted the Christian faith. The premises for Anselm’s argument can only be held if the only conception of non greater (relative to his attributes and worldly design) is God but if one does not follow such religious paths how can it be god. So in a sense god wouldn’t exists since you can’t have a mere conception of god without prior experience or impression of him. I will engage this scope of criticism by touching on Humean concepts and conveying how Anselm faith structured…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I say this because he kind of avoids the evils by coming up with excuses for as to why they occur still, rather than going against the occurrence. For example one thing he states is, since God is the father of us he has parental rights to allow us to suffer. This idea similarly follows the evidential problem of evil in the way that God has the right to have us suffer because in the end we gain greater good. He also states that suffering is a privilege even if that privilege seems to be forced upon you. However I feel like this is just a way of saying that evil happens no matter what.…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Ontological argument, written by philosopher St. Anselm of Canterbury in his book the Proslogion in the eleventh century, is a metaphysical argument for the existence of God in reality. In this essay I will discuss the validity of this argument. In this text Anselm states that the concept of God has the necessary and sufficient condition of being maximally perfect- ‘that than which a greater cannot be thought’- and that, since existing in reality is greater than existing only conceptually, God must exist in reality as well. Thus, if you understand the concept of God, you must agree that he is the greatest and that he exists, since these are written into the framework of the concept.…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There has been one philosophical question that has plagued religious thinkers for all of human history. Is there a God? Philosophers have argued for centuries about the existence of God and have yet to provide a convincing conclusion. By no means will I attempt to answer this question, but rather explore the complexities of their arguments. I have chosen to analyze the arguments of Thomas Aquinas, Blaise Pascal and Robert Adams respectively.…

    • 1598 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He thought that not a lot of people would be willing to compromise and accept one of those beliefs however, because if someone did they would be left with the conclusion that their high and all mighty God was in fact un-worthy of worshipping. After Mackie comes up with his own take on the problem of evil, he agrees with a lot of the points the problem of evil considers, and comes to the conclusion that the problem of evil is both inconsistent and illogical. Mackie set out to disprove the common belief that God was in fact an “omnipotent and wholly god” by coming up with an argument. He breaks the problem down to three propositions.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ontological argument is different than the cosmological or teleological arguments as it relies on A Priori knowledge rather than A Posteriori. A Priori knowledge is knowledge that you can know prior to any experience; it is known through reason alone. This essay will explore how reliable the ontological argument is. The ontological argument is an argument for the existence of god by St Anselm (1033-1109). Anselm defined god as “that than which nothing greater can be conceived.”…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thus, Mackie argues that God’s failure to do so suggests that God is no omnipotent and…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The existence of God, a topic discussed in both William Rowe’s and Robin Collins’ papers, but for two very different reasons. The argument of good vs. evil and the existence of an omnipresent, benevolent being such as God is a topic that many find very difficult to find answers for, and will continue to plague mankind for the rest of our existence. After reading the published works of Mr. Collins and Mr. Rowe, one may find it easier to formulate their own opinion. In the publication by Mr. Collins, he addresses the topic of atheism and theism in respect to physics.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mackie who wrote a paper, “Evil and Omnipotence,” which claims that God and evil don’t exist in an either/or dichotomy- that can both exist. However, the thinking and understanding of both together tend to contradict traditional Christian views on God. Mackie states that, “a good omnipotent thing eliminates evil completely, and the propositions that a good omnipotent thing exists and that evil exists are incompatible” (Mackie 200-212). He also affirms that “the problem of evil” would not arise as a contradiction if a person were to give up one of the characteristics that defines God (i.e. denying that God is omnipotent would not fall in conflict the essence of…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays