Role Of John Locke In A State Of Nature Essay

Superior Essays
Throughout this essay I will discuss key issues like what role does the state of nature play? and What is the state of nature?. I will also discuss political authority and how it is justified. I will be using most of my research from John Locke, a well known English philosopher. One of the fundamental questions of political philosophy that people ask is when is political authority legitimate, or when do we have to obey the duties that the state give us?, or who has the right to rule the state?. John Locke believed that having a government was a good thing, as it brought obedience to us, however a more limited government would be better. My main aim throughout this essay is to analyse Locke’s views on the state of nature and the government and …show more content…
I agree with what Locke has to say here, which is, in simpler terms, that anyone who abides by the law and treats it with respect will never have any reason to harm anyone else. Some people wonder will we ever know what living in a state of nature will ever be like. Locke says that to be in a State of nature means to observe the peace and preservation of all mankind and that everyone has the right to punish the fugitives of the law of nature to such a degree, as may block its misdemeanour (p.7). By acting this way I believe that Locke is correct in what he is saying. If everyone is treated as equals there would be no need for war in the world, this is why people question will we ever know what ti feels like to be in a state of nature, for the world categorises people, from their gender, religion, sexuality or disability, no one is treated fairly, Which brings in political authority. Are the government making this problem better or worse? From what I can see people in third world countries have no say in how the government is picked, yet they still have to abide by the rules that are made for

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    On one hand, John Locke believed that the state of nature is unsatisfactory, the government was therefore formed by social contract since people agree to transfer some of their rights to a centralized government in order to secure enjoyment of their properties. (Locke, 1764) Obviously, the formation of the American government is an example to illustrate Locke’s idea. The United States government derives its legitimacy and legal authority from the consent of the majority…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He places explicit limits on the power of government over its subjects. Raising ideas such as property rights and consent, Locke states that the primary role of a government is to preserve society, ie. a harmonious state in which men are guaranteed protection under the law, and property. (262) To him, if a government descends into tyrannical rule, a state in which those in power act in self interest or beyond the law, it is the populace’s…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thus leading individuals to create social contracts again for peace and protection of property. Not giving up their free will or rights. Locke believes the law of nature of still bound here. That the state exists solely to do what nature couldn’t and that is to uphold and protect natural rights of men.…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, he specified that “natural liberty of man is to be free from any superior power on earth, and not to be under the will or legislative authority of man, but to have only the law of nature for his rule (p. 205).” It must be understood that even the notion of the “law of nature” was a novel, new idea made possible only by the recent scientific discoveries of the time. Locke’s theories on politics and government were made possible by the Isaac Newton’s discovery of gravity as a law of nature. In contrast to the definition of natural liberty in which only the laws of nature govern, Locke discussed the value of a social contract of government which limits some natural individual liberties for the benefit of the common good: the liberty of man, in society, is to be under no legislative power, but that established, by consent, in the commonwealth; nor under the dominion of any will, or restraint of any law, but what that legislative shall enact, according to the trust put in it (p.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. In Locke’s Second Treatise on Government he proceeded and succeeded to define in his own words the “role of the civil government”. The first key point Locke tried to make in this documents was that to imagine there was no government and then imagine there was a government. Without the government there would be next chaos among large groups of people.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The theory of the state of nature has been explored by many scholars (John Locke, Thomas Hobbes, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, and John Rawls), which can help us better understand how gender fits into the different concepts of the state of nature. Mankind was brought into this world in a state of nature (pre-social condition) and had to give up liberties for self-preservation under a ruled society for the sole survival of man, or to better themselves. When describing the beginning of civilization, it’s vital to understand the different interpretations of how mankind created social contracts to avoid the state of nature. Two definitions of the state of nature that are important to understand is that of John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s. But more importantly, within the state of nature lies each author’s definition of gender and how it shows the structural similarity and differences between the two.…

    • 1482 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Each chapter explains a different part of how a government should be formed, where its authority should come from, and when it should be overthrown. Locke begins his work by stating the origins of men in nature, or how mankind existed before entering into civil society. Locke outlines the extent of man’s freedoms in nature; according to Locke man may “dispose of their possessions and persons, as they think fit, within the bounds of the law of nature, without asking leave, or depending upon the will of any other man. [4]” He then explains that man in the state of nature has no right to take his or any other man’s life.…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dorinda Outram’s book The Enlightenment contains the chapter “Enlightenment and Government” which highlights that contrary to popular belief, not all philosophes had the same ideas when it came to the ideal government. Outram focuses on the misconceptions people had about the Enlightenment and bring to light the true differences people had about government during this time period. Outram discusses the relationship between the Enlightenment and government, a relationship that has had few research. Through the lives of three leaders in Enlightenment and government John Lock, Baron de Montesquieu, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, it is clear how philosophes greatly differed yet had many similarities in the way they viewed government. John Locke’s view of government is based on the idea that all men are in a state of nature by God; Locke refers to this state as perfect freedom in Second Treatise on Government.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The right of nature is the liberty each man hath to use his own power, as he will himself, for the preservation of his own nature; that is to say, of his own life. ”-Thomas Hobbes… Two strong-minded social contract theorists concluded two different outlooks on several different topics, one main topic being the state of nature. John Locke feels as if peace is and should be the norm, we can and should be able to live in peace without having to worry about someone fondling with our property or belongings. Thomas Hobbes, on the other hand, feels like everyone isn’t going to agree that certain things are good or bad because that’s based on opinion.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the Founding Fathers wrote their articles they had a lot of major political ideas, which are political beliefs to make a fair life for everyone together possible with rights and laws. It is one 's political moral code and worldview. The most important major political idea are the laws of nature and nature’s God.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Most people take for granted many things we are afforded in this day and age. One of those things we take for granted is the government. Without said government there would be no laws to provide order and security, and we would be in a state of nature that would result in a state of war. A state of nature, regardless of who is detailing its differences, is basically a life without government rule leaving people to act out of self-preservation. A place without government is a place of chaos with everyone acting of their own accord.…

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    John Locke and Jean-Jacque Rousseau present themselves as very distinct philosophers. They both use similar terms, such as, the State of Nature, but conceptualize them differently. In my paper, I will argue that Locke’s argument on his proposed state of nature and civil society is more realistic in our working society than Rousseau’s theory. At the core of their theories, Locke and Rousseau both agree that we all begin in a State of Nature in that everyone should be “equal one amongst another without subordination or subjection,” in which we are free with no government or laws to guide one’s behavior.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “For the law of Nature would...be in vain if there were nobody that in the state of Nature had [the] power to execute that law” (Locke ¶ 7). Locke has come to the conclusion that if human nature is a law it can be changed by those who must abide by…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Because it doesn’t matter how much we complain about poor management of the state’ dealings and/or regulations imposed to us. There are no excuses for resisting power because it is the only thing between us and what we most want to avoid, the State of Nature. John Locke had a different approach as to the kind of place the State of Nature is, and consequently his argument concerning the Social Contract and the relationship between men and authority varies. According to Locke, the State of Nature is the natural condition of mankind.…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Many people specifically philosophers would question, “Why we need a state?” or “What kind of state should we have?” This question opened up all the different views and perspective of the three following philosophers, Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau. They all have different but also very similar views on the state of nature, social contract, laws. Hobbes definition of state of nature is a state of war. Morality doesn’t exists and everyone lives in constant fear.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays