Leviathan By Thomas Hobbes And The Second Treatise Of Government In Modern Society

Improved Essays
The famous political texts Leviathan by Thomas Hobbes and The Second Treatise of Government by John Locke have had a profound impact on what is seen to be the role of government in society, with the latter having more lasting influence, particularly in modern society. The former, in short, argues that men ought to submit themselves and all of their rights to an entity with absolute authority over them, and that no matter how this man, or assembly of men abuses its power, they ought not to resist this entity, as the alternative is a chaotic, violent world. Just by examining the thesis of Hobbes’ work, one would easily deduce that such an idea is contrary to the ideals lauded in our modern society, those being of certain inalienable rights, the rule of law, and the separation/limitation of powers.
Locke presents each of these aforementioned ideals and explains them to be essential to governance for the common good. He places explicit limits on the power of government over its subjects. Raising ideas such as property rights and consent, Locke states that the primary role of a government is to preserve society, ie. a harmonious state in which men are guaranteed protection under the law, and property. (262) To him, if a government descends into tyrannical rule, a state in which those in power act in self interest or beyond the law, it is the populace’s
…show more content…
(208) One doesn’t need to go into painstaking detail to prove that totalitarian rule has led to immeasurable human suffering, with Hitler’s Germany, Maoist China, and Stalinist Russia immediately comes to mind. Locke correctly is skeptical of absolute power, likening it to slavery and a state of war. (248) Although there is certainly merit to the very basics of Hobbes’ argument, the basics of Locke’s argument are quite

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes, strongly supporting a sovereign government to control political and social order, debates the evils of man’s free…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Locke points out the freedom of the ruled over the rights of the sovereign. Locke favors a legislature government over a monarch. He puts up in mind an administration with the fear of concentrated power. For Locke, the most horrible form of the regime is tyranny, consequently, as much as possible; he puts the power to the hands of the people, where Hobbes prefers the sovereign. The government of Locke obtains its rule directly from the citizens, whereas Hobbes’s monarch rules absolutely.…

    • 1758 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some people believe that complete freedom will bring chaos to individuals because humans need some sort of leadership, and some believe that freedom brings only opportunities to show how great some people truly are. These two contrasting views on freedom are explained through the philosophical texts and views of Martin Luther King Jr and Thomas Hobbes. Martin Luther King Jr enlightened the entire world with his views in Love, Law and Civil Disobedience and Thomas Hobbes showed the world a new side of political philosophy with his work in Leviathan. In both of these works one can see the contrasting views on freedom and can judge what influenced these views based on the time period that these philosophers lived.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    a. Magna Carta. The first written constitution in European history was the Magna Carta. The Magna Carta represents freedom from oppression and was an influence on our Founders of America showing liberty as they separated from the England. It protects the freedoms from unlawful searches and seizures, a right to a speedy trial, a right to a jury trial in both a criminal and a civil case, and protection from loss of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Each chapter explains a different part of how a government should be formed, where its authority should come from, and when it should be overthrown. Locke begins his work by stating the origins of men in nature, or how mankind existed before entering into civil society. Locke outlines the extent of man’s freedoms in nature; according to Locke man may “dispose of their possessions and persons, as they think fit, within the bounds of the law of nature, without asking leave, or depending upon the will of any other man. [4]” He then explains that man in the state of nature has no right to take his or any other man’s life.…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even in the composition of the Declaration of Independence, the first official document written in the pursuit of autonomy, those who sought to win freedom and blaze a new path in government administration were heavily influenced by the philosophy of John Locke. One of the most famous lines in the Declaration ends with the “unalienable” rights that all men have just by virtue of existing. They are the right to “Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness” (US 1776). Even as early as 1776, the Founding Fathers advocated for a government that worked for the people, not at their expense. Its sole purpose was secure those aforementioned God-given rights; the government did not grant them.…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He argues that an absolute monarchy places all of its power in one person, which impairs the entire system. He also argues that since a monarch can encroach people’s property and life without redress the people lack incentive to contribute to the collective well-being of the society. Locke challenges the idea of an absolute monarchy based on the idea that an absolute monarch who abuses the “property” or life of any civil member is in violation of natural law. He suggests that to prevent this, authority should be placed in a collective body and that no one person should be above the law. The textbook states that Locke believed “government […] had been instituted to protect life, liberty, an property; no political authority could infringe these natural rights.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For instance, the government can take away land without a valid reason, or could have someone murdered, simply because the leader commands so. Hobbes claims that society has to obey its government at all times. This would create tension and oppression with individuals a, b, c and d. As Young states, “The powerless are those who lack authority or power even in this mediated sense, those over whom power is exercised without their exercising it; the powerless are situated so that they must take orders and rarely have the right to give them” (Young 52). This quote helps illustrate the weaknesses that becomes the structure of one…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thomas Hobbes and John Locke both agree that subjects shall summit to a sovereign their right and obligations such as, judgment and consequences. It can be due to both having the notion that their ideal ruler(s) should have some sort of authority towards their men. In order to guide them to peace. Also by doing this their sovereign(s) can be portrayed as superior and subject’s inferior by having more rights and entitlement than them. In other words, it creates some hierarchical system where both Hobbes and Locke ideal ruler(s) authorize all that occurs within society and subjects shall be obedient with minimal input.…

    • 2054 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Locke and Jacques Rousseau were two of the foremost intellectuals of the seventeenth century that help ingrain the enduring theories of how man should govern themselves in their writings, “The Second Treatise of Civil Government” by John Locke, and “On the Social Contract” by Rousseau. Deriving out of these writings, we are capable to differentiate the two contradistinction philosophical thoughts that separates the two authors according to the way the citizens are contrived. Locke, who aligns with the contemporary version of “Classical Liberalism,” which is the modern-day political right, establishes a good citizen by entering into civil society based on a consent form of government and majority rule. This understanding of political…

    • 1365 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    PS4217F Major Political Thinkers: Hobbes Assignment 1: What are the main strengths and weaknesses of Hobbes’ theory of civil order? Name: Denise Cher Yan Wen Matriculation Number: A0127001A Word Count: 1887 Introduction Hobbes’ theory of civil order is based on the fundamental law of nature, which is to seek peace (Hobbes 2012, 200). According to Hobbes, to seek peace is necessarily to seek peace in the condition of war, and justice is therefore a legal compliance with the terms of the social contract (Hobbes 2012, 220).…

    • 1919 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is argued by Hobbes that it is preferentable to consent to the absolute authority of a sovereign because it is superior to the chaos of “war of all against all” in the state of nature. Hobbes (1651) argues that men will turn against men and no industry can exist, he implies that any government, even totalitarian or oppressive governments, is better than none. But the same fear that we have against our neighbourstransgressing against us, we do not expect of ourselves in the absence of government. Berkman (1972, p. 183) asks “why does everyone think he can be decent enough without the policeman, but that the club is needed for “the others””. Furthermore, if we accept that it is rational to not trust our neighbours as they may take advantage…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The foundation of human rights comes from political sovereign states’ beliefs, traditions, and values. Consequently, this Leviathan creates conditions where the subordinate has to agree to a social contract in which individual rights are given to the state in order to maintain a civil society where the government enforces the contract and the people obey the authority of the law. This disputes the idea of natural rights, instead in society, order is maintained through this social construct of a particular political and cultural entities beliefs and rights and liberties are a derived from this social mechanism. Thomas Hobbes claims that the “power of the sovereign is derived from the natural right of people through the event of a social contract”…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He was positive towards human nature and believed that humans were born with natural rights. He expressed his beliefs in documents called Two Treaties of Government and The Second Treatise of Civil Government. “Man being born, as has been proved, with a title to perfect freedom, and an uncontrolled enjoyment of all the rights and privileges of the law of nature, equally with any other man…” is a quote from The Second Treatise of Civil Government. It is shown in both documents that Locke believed that governments were formed only to maintain and protect natural rights. He disagreed with the idea of an absolute monarchy, but instead said that limited power was more effective.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The nature of man and the state of nature have varied and contrast immensely throughout different societies. Locke, Hobbes, and Rousseau’s ideas about the state of man clash in the form of politics and social contracts. Locke’s view involves the power residing within the people, and the government is there to protect their property, life, and liberty. Hobbes’ ideas are in favor of a monarchy in order to keep the citizens secure and free from harm. Rousseau’s ideas on the politics shares a collective will amongst the population.…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays