With the help of film critics everywhere, we can more easily decide between various newmovies- the exciting thriller, the cute romantic-comedy, or the terrifying horror, based on ratingand a preview of the plot. Godfrey Cheshire is among these reviewers who make the luxury ofseeing a movie even better. One of the films that was recently reviewed by him is The Beatles:Eight Days A Week- The Touring Years. This review can be found on the late reviewer, RogerEbert’s website, rogerebert.com. Cheshire should continue writing reviews, as he did an amazingjob of displaying his personal connection to the film, noting the overall gist of the film, and contributing a valid review with reasoning.The Beatles: Eight Days A Week- The Touring Years is a 2016
…show more content…
He goes on to describe the instantaneous impact that the Beatles had on the U.S. and the world. Using words such as “infectious brilliance”, it is clear that Cheshire’s earliest memories of the Beatles are nothing but positive. By displaying his personal connection and memories of the Beatles, Cheshire can immediately hook the reader and even develop a connection with the reader, especially those who also recall the chaos that resulted when the Beatles’ music reached the country. A brief overview of the plot is a huge aspect of a review that can sway readers to either see or not see the film being discussed. Regarding the main points of the documentary, Cheshire states:As its cumbersome title indicates, the documentary was founded on the wise choice of not trying to make a single feature that would encompass the band’s entire career. Rather, in focusing on the years when the band became the first ever to mount several world-spanning tours, it offers two things at once: a history of the Beatles during the years of their initial success; and a tribute to the group’s powers as a live act (Cheshire, Godfrey).He also notes that the documentary includes the entirety of songs, rather than just snippets and cutsto different scenes. In addition to this, included are some old John Lennon and George Harrison interviews, along with recent interviews with Paul McCartney and Ringo Starr. He continues onto discuss that the film displays the chaos caused by Beatlemania and how wonderstruck the Beatles were by all of it. The short glimpse of the film given to the reader by Cheshire is sure
He goes on to describe the instantaneous impact that the Beatles had on the U.S. and the world. Using words such as “infectious brilliance”, it is clear that Cheshire’s earliest memories of the Beatles are nothing but positive. By displaying his personal connection and memories of the Beatles, Cheshire can immediately hook the reader and even develop a connection with the reader, especially those who also recall the chaos that resulted when the Beatles’ music reached the country. A brief overview of the plot is a huge aspect of a review that can sway readers to either see or not see the film being discussed. Regarding the main points of the documentary, Cheshire states:As its cumbersome title indicates, the documentary was founded on the wise choice of not trying to make a single feature that would encompass the band’s entire career. Rather, in focusing on the years when the band became the first ever to mount several world-spanning tours, it offers two things at once: a history of the Beatles during the years of their initial success; and a tribute to the group’s powers as a live act (Cheshire, Godfrey).He also notes that the documentary includes the entirety of songs, rather than just snippets and cutsto different scenes. In addition to this, included are some old John Lennon and George Harrison interviews, along with recent interviews with Paul McCartney and Ringo Starr. He continues onto discuss that the film displays the chaos caused by Beatlemania and how wonderstruck the Beatles were by all of it. The short glimpse of the film given to the reader by Cheshire is sure