Sympathy is thus in the theory more than a simple emotion, now instead having key importance in the moral definition of an individual and the greater society at large. This “passion[ate]” sympathy emitted in “the breast of every attentive spectator” upon witnessing an event creates an opportunity for moral judgment. Through this scenario, sympathy as part of moral understanding therefore does not emerge through witnessing specific people and their actions, yet instead only through certain “situation[s] which [particularly] excites it” does sympathy arise. In conclusion to the concept of sympathy within moral philosophy, Smith believes that “to sympathize with another 's feelings is to approve of those feelings,” in whatever context they are created, and that to sympathize as what is called an “impartial spectator” would hence give moral approval to the other’s feelings. The addition of an impartial spectator aspect to this theory, however, clearly fails to consider complications such as misinterpretations of events by the observer, creating sympathy for an inaccurate assessment of
Sympathy is thus in the theory more than a simple emotion, now instead having key importance in the moral definition of an individual and the greater society at large. This “passion[ate]” sympathy emitted in “the breast of every attentive spectator” upon witnessing an event creates an opportunity for moral judgment. Through this scenario, sympathy as part of moral understanding therefore does not emerge through witnessing specific people and their actions, yet instead only through certain “situation[s] which [particularly] excites it” does sympathy arise. In conclusion to the concept of sympathy within moral philosophy, Smith believes that “to sympathize with another 's feelings is to approve of those feelings,” in whatever context they are created, and that to sympathize as what is called an “impartial spectator” would hence give moral approval to the other’s feelings. The addition of an impartial spectator aspect to this theory, however, clearly fails to consider complications such as misinterpretations of events by the observer, creating sympathy for an inaccurate assessment of