The Meta-Making Process: The Case Of Latisha

Managers have to make tough decisions that will actively affect an agency or organization. If LaTisha was an administrator like First Deputy County Clerk Christie Baird, she would develop an approach to the situation and use decision planning and strategies for the purpose of the involved entities. Hoppe de Sousa & Sin Oih Yu (2014) feel that problems that exist in an organization that mandate decision making need a plan for their own decision making process; they label that process as meta-decisions. This process would result in the meta-decision the authors illustrate as effective decision making. It is the managers responsibility to monitor the performance standards and determine the reason for performance failure. LaTisha would provide closer supervision, instruction, and more training as needed during the first year of her employment to ensure fairness. LaTisha would also spend some time with the employee and together conduct a review of her work productivity. Request daily metrics and reports to pay …show more content…
At the time of the interview, a candidate is asked about his skills and capabilities which can satisfy the minimum criteria of the recruitment policy of the organization. It is the responsibility of interviewer to check whether the candidate will or will not be able to work efficiently. In case, the candidate selected is minimally competent, an organization should conditionally hire the individual instead of employing him or her as a permanent employee. It is not appropriate to fire that individual before completion of probation period. The employee should be allowed to complete this probation period because he or she deserves the same. The organization may find it the waste of resources and time with no output; when it can be obtained from a more respective employee. In the perspective of effective business and organizational process, the termination of Heather seems logical, but not