The Media Naturalness Theory And Its Effect On Communication Essays

1547 Words Nov 22nd, 2016 7 Pages
Comparatively, the screen time argument is something that everyone can determine for themselves, whether it be good or bad, yet the facts mustn’t be set aside. The media naturalness theory asks the important question that follows: “What should happen when we selectively suppress face-to-face communication elements (e.g., colocation, the ability to employ facial expressions, etc.) through e-communication technologies?” (Kock pg. 2). Realistically, there must be an answer as to what happens when we suppress face-to-face communication through e-communication technologies such as (e-mail, video games, and smartphones). The Media Naturalness Theory brings up the examples of colocation (business) and the ability to employ facial expressions, which suggests that these are being interfered with in a negative type of way by use of screen time. Nicholas Kardaras, a writer for the New York Times recalls an experience that recently involved screen time:
“She found him sitting up in his bed staring wide-eyed, his bloodshot eyes looking into the distance as his glowing iPad lay next to him. He seemed to be in a trance. Beside herself with panic, Susan had to shake the boy repeatedly to snap him out of it. Distraught, she could not understand how her once-healthy and happy little boy had become so addicted to the game that he wound up in a catatonic stupor” (Kardaras pg. 2).
The widely believed thing about technology and screen time with children is that it can be educational, which is…

Related Documents