The Loss of Human Dignity with a Naturalistic World Essay example

4892 Words 20 Pages
The loss of Human Dignity with a Naturalistic World Throughout the centuries there have been various theories that have tried unsuccessfully to account for human dignity and intrinsic value without God. However, this paper will only focus on the theory of naturalism and its lack of a strong argument for the existence of either. Therefore there must be a successful accounting of the presence of God within the theory of naturalism to argue the existence of human dignity and intrinsic value successfully according to JP Moreland. One cannot argue against philosophical theory without first opening their eyes to the opposing debate. This argument is not about Christianity or the existence of a particular religion but the …show more content…
In this paper I will discuss JP Moreland’s argument for the failure of naturalism to account for human dignity and intrinsic value. I will begin by presenting Moreland’s argument against the theory of naturalism without God, and then proceed to point out the weaknesses within Moreland’s theory and naturalism, and offer some alternative options for the co-mingling of the two theories. Moreland is convinced that it is especially hard to contrive how the attempt to substantiate intrinsic value was ever conceived within a naturalistic theory. As stated by Mark Linville “What a fortuitous chain of events that resulted in the actual existence of the kinds of creatures to whom eternal and necessarily true, but casually impotent, principles apply.” After all, more times than not, a strict naturalist will completely remove the terms freedom, consciousness, or free will as we are familiar with them in a theistic perspective and replace them with their own definition in order to avoid dealing with the lack of mortality or intrinsic value within their theory. There by manipulating their meaning with the hope of diffusing the strength of a theistic argument against their theory. In addition, Moreland also states that it is almost impossible for a naturalist to answer why human

Related Documents