Summary Of Einhard's Life Of Charlemagne

Improved Essays
Einhard composes Life of Charlemagne in 825 AD with the intention of commemorating King Charles’s well rounded devotion to his kingdom and his family, as he went beyond the expected duties of a King. Throughout the course of his life, Einhard had became very fond of the King and felt it his responsibility to preserve his knowledge of the King’s great deeds subsequent to the King’s death. Einhard provides a detailed piece of writing in which he eternalizes the deeds enacted by the King through which the King’s devotion, to both his kingdom and his family, is reflected. First, Einhard provides some detail about rulers who came before King Charles. In doing so, he provides the reader the opportunity to create a comparison in which King Charles …show more content…
Through his many battles and friendly alliances, he was able to do just that. He “refused to back away from a war already in progress or to leave a job undone, until he had by sheer determination and persistance completely achieved the goal he had set for himself” (138). When it came to a war against the Lombards, King Charles “did not stop until he had, by means of a long siege, worn King Desiderius down and had accepted his complete surrender” (138). Even when a war became unbelievably difficult against worthy rivals, “the king’s greatness [of spirit] and steadfast determination—both in bad times and good—could not be conquered by their fickleness or worn down by the task he had set himself” (139). “These were the wars that that mighty king waged with great skill and success in many lands over the forty-seven years he reigned. In those wars he so splendidly added to the Frankish kingdom that he nearly doubled its size” (140). In addition to the successful expansion, King Charles “increased the glory of his kingdom by winning over kings and peoples through friendly means” …show more content…
After becoming emperor, he “realized there were many deficiencies in the laws of his people” that would remain present after his passing if not corrected (145). In preparation for his succession, out of devotion to leaving his kingdom better off than he received it, he decided “to fill in what was lacking, to reconcile the disagreements, and also to set right what was bad and wrongly expressed” within the laws (145). He also “decided to draw up a will, so that he might make his daughters and illegitimate children to some part of his estate” (146). He divided up his things and desired for each of the four portions to be divvied out to specific recipients. One part was to go to “each metropolitan city” (147). Another was to be “divided by his sons and daughters, and by the sons and daughters of his sons in a fair and reasonable partition” (147). The third part “should be set aside for the poor” and finally, the fourth part “set aside to support the male and female servants of the palace itself” (147). Not only did the king ensure that, as to be expected, his children would inherit his riches, but also that his beloved kingdom would also benefit from his wealth upon his

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Both, Sean Kelsey’s, “The Death of Charles I,” and “The Trial and Execution of Charles I,” written by Clive Holmes are historical articles that present detailed accounts on the trial and execution of King Charles I. Although these historians compare in their attempts to evaluate the significance of the incident, their works contrast radically in terms of developing these views. Where Kelsey believes that the trial of King Charles was never intended as a pretext to execution, Holmes disagrees. This variation is expressed through the key aspects of political relationships and the temperament of the military as an institution. It is through these trends, that this paper will serve as a demonstration to how the prevailing polarization between Kelsey…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    No, Einhard’s Life of Charlemange is not a hagiography. A hagiography is writing about saints, Charlemange was not a saint. Einhard’s story was about the life and death of Charlemange as an emperor. The story talks about all the wars that had taken place under the rule of Charlemange. Charlemange had began a war on the Lombards and did not end the war until he made their king surrender and also running the king’s son out of the kingdom and Italy.…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ap Euro Dbq Essay

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. Charlemagne was known as the King of the Franks, as he is known for establishing the Carolingian Empire through a series of conquests. He also believed in a knowledgeable revitalization, even though he was illiterate. 2. The term used by historians for the middle age of Europe was called medieval.…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He made “counts” giving them land and making them part of the aristocracy. In return their duties were to maintain a local army loyal to the king, collect tribute and dues, and administer justice. However, many used these positions…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was interesting to see that how Charlemagne has many different personalities as a leader. I found one short story that was very interesting about Charlemagne. In the story it said that “sons of two nobles, whose duty it was to keep watch at the door of the king’s tent” (88,Stammerer). The nobles did not do a very job with the task that they were given with. The nobles drank so much that they were passed out and left Charlemagne tent unguarded.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Charles The Great Dbq

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Charlemagne or Charles the Great is most famous ruler of the Middle Ages. He lived ca 742-814 and ruled over the Frankish kingdom which covered Belgium, France, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and a part of western Germany. He went on to conquer much of western Europe, all under a policy of friendship and cooperation with the Christian Church. He therefore greatly contributed to the expansion of the Christian Church’s power. He also introduced the basis of Feudalism and revived the political and cultural life of Europe after the fall of Western Rome.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Since his armies were always fighting, Charlemagne's gave land to his warriors so they could equip and support themselves. This important gift was able to secure an army of warriors who were deeply loyal and devoted to Charlemagne. By the year 800, the Frankish kingdom included all of modern Holland, Switzerland, Belgium, France, and most of Germany along with large areas of Spain and Italy. Clearly, it seemed that Charlemagne was another Constantine, and possibly even another Augustus Caesar.…

    • 145 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Written circa 826, Einhard’s Life of Charlemagne provides historians with rare insight into Emperor Charlemagne’s inner circle and intimate details of his life. Intended to commemorate Charlemagne’s character and achievements, Einhard’s document also delves into the nature of Charlemagne’s empire, examining which political strategies helped or hindered the Frankish Empire’s formation. In regards to the nature and scope of Charlemagne’s empire, Einhard draws particular attention to the ways in which the Frankish Empire was the continuation and embodiment of old, Roman prestige. However, Einhard ultimately draws attention away from traditional associations of empire and imperialism, instead focusing on a very specific– and often overlooked–…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Charlemagne, also known as Charles the Great, greatly impacted Ancient Rome through his role as Emperor of Western Europe. Through art and culture Charlemagne’s traditions still exist today. In order to understand his impact it is crucial to learn his background, time as a ruler, effect on Ancient Rome, the Carolingian renaissance, and traditions that exist today. Just like any other ruler, Charlemagne had to start somewhere.…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Looking at the reigns of the ancient rulers, one sees evidence of how these attributes make a good ruler, affected their reign, and, in turn, the lives of their subjects. Comparing two rulers, Alexander of Mesopotamian and Clovis, King of the Franks, the similarities are unmistakable. Each one demonstrated vast military knowledge and courage. During military offensives, Clovis pillaged neighboring villages in pursuit of treasure. Alexander was a military genius and trained…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Chrlemagne Vs Charlemagne

    • 131 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The strongest of the Franks were the first Carolingians, who had a son named Charlemagne. The powerful Charlemagne and his army conquered land to help his kingdom grow, as well as to help the Pope. Since Charlemagne helped the Pope, the church and the Pope both supported Charlemagne’s decisions as Emperor. Charlemagne wanted a more effective government, so he established a city in Aachen. Since Charlemagne’s empire was so large, he hired counts to help him rule his empire, as well as inspectors to keep an eye on his counts.…

    • 131 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In chapter 16 of The Life of Charlemagne, Einhard goes into extreme detail regarding the friendships that Charlemagne had with the rulers of other Kingdoms. At the end of the chapter, Einhard recounts a story in which “the emperors of Constantinople… were seeking his friendship and alliance. But after he had taken up the name of emperor they suspected that he might want to seize their empire, so he established such a firm treaty with them that no source of any trouble might remain between them” (Einhard 30). This goes to show the honorable way in which Charlemagne ran and expanded his empire. While Charlemagne was most definitely a ruthless leader, he also wanted to show that he was fair to his allies and did not wish to seize their empires.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Charlemagne’s accomplishments did ultimately outweigh his failures, and as a result, he did deserve the title “Charles the Great”. By 800 Charlemagne had succeeded in greatly extending his power while crushing several enemies. As the sworn protector of the Church, he was in fact the Holy Roman Emperor of Rome, which helped him in fulfilling his goal of converting all of the Franks to Christianity. In addition, Charlemagne attempted to create unity and harmony within his vast empire and to support laws and promote learning that would achieve his goals of the empire. Through his program of cultural revival and changes to the Church, he succeeded in improving the level of civilization in the West.…

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Once he had this title, he gained the support of the Christian people. If Charles Martel had lost to the Muslims at the Battle of Tours, the Muslims would have continued to expand into Europe, presumably getting rid of the catholic identity of the Franks and Europe. Also, as Charlemagne promoted the expansion of the Carolingian dynasty, more and more territory was being added and higher portions of land were being put together for the next generation of leaders. The empire would eventually be divided among Charlemagne's three grandsons in the Treaty of Verdun.(Doc H). Soon after, the empire began to collapse and weaken.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Charlemagne as a successful ruler and administrator. He treated his subjects very well and knew when people needed to be punished, when to forgive them, and when to reward them for their actions. He traveled throughout his kingdom in order to exert his power and to help with any issues that may have come about. As a ruler he helped to spread Christianity throughout the kingdom. He made the laws for everyday people clearer and enacted new…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays