Patient Privilege Case Study

Improved Essays
Consider an individual is arrested for murdering his neighbor. The suspect goes to his attorney and confesses every detail of the crime. At trial, the defendant’s attorney is called to the witness stand to testify about the conversation between the attorney and the defendant. There is no doubt if this were to play out that the defendant would be convicted and spend a lifetime in prison. So the question exist, is there really a need for privileged communication? Even though society wants the entire truth when a crime is committed, it does not override the absolute need for privileged communication. In the United States, the legal system operates on the basic theory that what a person says can be used against him or her (Hails 2012). The exception …show more content…
The information gathered during the time they were married is still considered privileged and cannot be used. However, any communication after the divorce is finalized can be used. The purpose behind the husband-wife privilege is to ensure either party does not damage the marital relationship. The physician-patient privilege first went into law in New York in 1828. The physician-client privilege is similar to the attorney-client privilege. Meaning, the physician cannot provide complete care for the patient unless he has the pertinent information. In order for this privilege to exist, the physician must be licensed. In Louisiana, physician-patient privilege only extends to criminal law, not civil (Bolin Jr., 1967). There are several exceptions to the physician-patient communication privilege:
• Driving under the influence test
…show more content…
In addition, a number of states included psychiatrists in the physician-patient communication privilege. Although the psychiatrist-patient communication privilege needs to be in place to care for the clients, there are strong opponents to this provision.
The first challenged to the clergy-penitent communication privileged was in New York in 1813 (Yellin, 1983). The confidentiality of the Catholic confessionals developed the clergy-penitent and it slowly expanded from there (Hails, 2012). The clergy-penitent communication must be in a private setting and the clergy must be providing spiritual information. The privilege does not extend to clergy that are acting as marriage or family counselors, unless they are a licensed therapist. The unique thing about the clergy-penitent communication privilege is that either party can refuse the right to reveal what was

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    They may say that under unqualified confidentiality, they cannot disclose this sensitive information to anyone, thus making their knowledge of it useless. Kipnis (2006/2008) replies by saying that “there is only one thing they cannot do: disclose” and that “[a]ll other paths remain open (p. 56). He explains that there are other options for preventing harm to a third party without breaching confidentiality, such as attempting to convince the patient to agree to have the information disclosed. He speaks of a clinician who was able to persuade the majority of his patients to agree to have their spouse notified of the risk they faced (Kipnis, 2006/2008, p. 56). If a doctor can find creative ways to disclose the risk without breaking confidentiality, then he has upheld his moral duty to his patient and his legal duty to the endangered person.…

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argument In the case of Swidler and Berlin v. United States, the government issued a subpoena to obtain the handwritten notes of attorney Hamilton that had been written during a meeting with his client, Vincent Foster. A few days later the client, Foster, committed suicide. The argument of the United States government was that because the client was deceased they could legally obtain the notes disregarding the attorney – client privilege.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Client information in written or electronic form that is shared with other professionals must have the client 's prior written consent except in the course of professional supervision or when legally obliged or permitted to share such information”. Lastly, barriers or obstacles to client care can occur. In Renee’s case parental failure to provide support of the intervention strategies or disagreement between the family, case manager and additional support providers could…

    • 1502 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Synopsis: Garrity v. New Jersey (1967) was the result of an investigation into alleged “ticket fixing”. The case initially involved five police officers and one civilian employee from different boroughs of New Jersey who were suspected of alleged “ticket fixing” and diverting funds to other programs. The state Attorney General ordered an investigation into the allegations and the five officers were convicted of conspiracy to obstruct the administration of the traffic laws. They appealed the court’s decision to the New Jersey State Supreme Court, which upheld the conviction. They then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court citing that they were coerced and their statements were not given voluntarily due to the threat of losing their positions.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    A conversation with someone is not worth losing your job, or license. Confidentiality is something you should respect no matter who is inquiring. Laws are placed to protect patients and we should abide by them. I would not want someone discussing my personal information or diagnosis with others. We should be able to put our trust in health care providers.…

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical Considerations Holmes’ defense claimed that his notebook was protected by physician-patient privilege, but the prosecution argued that it should be trial evidence. “The big issues for the court to decide are whether or not a privileged relationship between psychiatrist and patient actually exists, whether anything the patient has done has waived that privilege and whether there is an exception,” said Patrick Furman, a law professor at the University of Colorado.” (Ingold, 2012) Holmes notebook detailed how he planned to kill people, included drawings, his reconnaissance of various sites, possible casualty counts, and police station locations.…

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The policy (or main issue beyond addressing secondary issues such as right to amend a complaint etc.) at issue in the cases of Tenuto v. Lederle (1997) , Safer v. Estate of Pack (1996) , and Molloy v. Meier (2006) is at which length do physicians have to notifying family (hereditary offspring), close associates, or those in contact with a patient of disease transmission; either through genetic heredity or by contact with a communicable pathogen. In all three cases, the policy is consistent as the three cases all dealt with a physician’s duty to warn others beyond the patient themselves- even if it seemed to violate the privacy rules normally expected in a physician-patient relationship.…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The only exception is justified when is a mater of public interest and is a need to put into the balance the benefit or the harm of disclosure; analogously the healthcare team needs to consider disclosure of information against a child expressed decision under the 'Gillick Competent' if his best interest is in conflict with his own decision. If the patient, it is incompetent their medical record can be shared with family, key carers and other healthcare professionals aiming the patient's best interest (Hope et al 2008)19. However, regardless if the patient is competent or not, it is protected by law in the event of breaches of confidentiality can expand into harmful consequences impacting on patients well being…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A conflict between a physician and patient on the course of treatment is a common topic that arises in bioethical conversation. This case explores the topic of paternalistic choices dealing with patient autonomy and when it is ethically reasonable for a physician to intervene and decide as to whether an individual is competent to make decisions about their own care. The patient in the case, Mr. Howe was asked to make a lifesaving medical decision while in duress and not fully understanding the procedure and the potential outcome if he refused. In this case I believe the physician made the correct decision to intubate Mr. Howe against his explicit instructions not to. The physician made a determination that the patient was not accurately expressing his wishes as if he was of sound mind.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Medical practitioners should be aware that when they share information about the patient they should think whether it is beneficial to the patient and whether the colleague needs to know that information. GP 's should have a confidentiality policy because it is protecting patient’s personal information. The surgery I have researched (surgery X) has a high confidentiality policy because they make sure there are no files which are accessible to any unauthorised people. Only professional and patients can access the information. They keep their records in files in a cabinet locked out of sight within the reception area.…

    • 2083 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this memo I explain how privilege can cause large groups of people to receive unfair treatment due to their identity and background. It contains discussion how being part of a more privileged group in society gives me advantages while being part of a minority leaves people with significantly fewer resources. Areas in Which I am Privileged There are several reasons why I am privileged; being white, able-bodied, cisgender, receiving an education, and having a stable income are all examples.…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For attorneys to be able to do their jobs effectively they need complete access to all of their client’s information pertaining to the case being tried (Gaines & Miller, 2015, p. 155). As a result, the attorney client privilege was established. Attorney client privilege is a rule which states that any information given between the client and his or her attorney will be kept completely confidential (Gaines & Miller, 2015, p. 155). For example, a client informs his or her attorney that he or she is guilty of committing a robbery; the attorney has to keep that information to his or herself. However, there are exceptions to this rule.…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Confidentiality can be described as a set of guidelines and procedures that place boundaries and restrictions on certain types of information. In medicine, the ability to keep a patient's health data private is one of the core responsibilities of a physician. In A Defense of Unqualified Medical Confidentiality, Kenneth Kipnis describes his view of patient privacy as absolute and something that must be upheld without waiver. In his essay, he disagrees with the views of the justice system and its stance in which it suggests confidentiality may be breached in order to ensure the welfare of a third party. He believes that legal and personal standards are not acceptable motivation to break the bond between patient/doctor trust.…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Yet more than just contacting the family, the Hipporatic Oath had been in circulation centuries and included patient confidentiality and stated that a physicain must promise confidentiality to the patient. Despite this all, the Hippocratic Oath was not a law, and merely a guideline. On the contrary, it can be said that this can all be disregarded because once a patient is dead, they have no right to privacy. This is displayed in the line “ And the dead have no right to privacy-even if part of them is still alive” (Skloot, 211).…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both understand confidentiality and trust are the Foundation to treatment and protection for the clients. Members must keep all records secure and in compliance with HIPAA and allowing only authorized Personnel having access to them. Written Consent must be given in order to release confidential information and documentation unless if an emergency exists, then verbal consent will be enough to release information. In both codes of ethics, the provider of services is required to contact the authorities when there is a clear and imminent danger to the client or two other persons. Only pertinent information is given to emergency or medical personnel directly involved in reducing the danger or threat.…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays