In consideration of the damage of tobacco use, government bans tobacco advertising to prevent it. Actually, smoking can be avoided, and the banning on promotion “is one of the most effective ways to reduce tobacco consumption” (ban). A common misunderstanding is that the tobacco advertisement cannot be attractive enough to make audience try smoking. Contrarily, “one third of” young smokers first try smoking because of the “exposure to tobacco advertising” (ban). Since advertising can be so powerful for readers, the banning on advertising can also be powerful to prevent tobacco use. Though the prohibition is not imposed strictly enough right now, it has been useful. The tobacco consumption has reduced “7%” in “countries that have already introduced bans” (ban). On the basis of the respectable result of banning, it can be predicted that a better banning will contribute to a more positive
In consideration of the damage of tobacco use, government bans tobacco advertising to prevent it. Actually, smoking can be avoided, and the banning on promotion “is one of the most effective ways to reduce tobacco consumption” (ban). A common misunderstanding is that the tobacco advertisement cannot be attractive enough to make audience try smoking. Contrarily, “one third of” young smokers first try smoking because of the “exposure to tobacco advertising” (ban). Since advertising can be so powerful for readers, the banning on advertising can also be powerful to prevent tobacco use. Though the prohibition is not imposed strictly enough right now, it has been useful. The tobacco consumption has reduced “7%” in “countries that have already introduced bans” (ban). On the basis of the respectable result of banning, it can be predicted that a better banning will contribute to a more positive