The Importance Of Humanity In The Leviathan By Thomas Hobbes

Improved Essays
In his book The Leviathan Thomas Hobbes begins with bringing to the readers attention that despite the fact that all men may not be deemed equal that they were created equal. He backs up this statement by saying, "For as to the strength of body, the weakest has strength enough to kill the strongest, either by a secret machination, or by confederacy with others, that are in the same danger with himself. In saying this, Hobbes illustrates that physical strength is not really an issue or a major factor. Hobbes makes it clear that all men are equal and that they should fear each other.

Something else that Hobbes made clear in The Leviathan that, similar to himself, all men desire peace. After making this statement, he must justify why, if in
…show more content…
In the natural state, man has no one to tell them not to act on instinct. Man has no one to tell them not to lie, cheat, and steal and because of this absence of authority, they do whatever they feel is right. They do what they feel will bring them satisfaction no matter how immoral it may seem by the standards of the civilized world. Because of the fact that a government can not be formed in a state of war, it must be formed by a group of peaceful men, in the natural state. While this may seem to go against the laws of human nature, it does not. By creating a government with a central power at its head, the fear of war and death are hence eliminated. Thus, by eliminating the fear of war and death, and guaranteeing the basic needs of life, the laws of human nature are concurrently …show more content…
The first responsibility is to protect the country from the aggression of foreign countries. The second, is to act as an irrefutable, and unbiased judge. Once this government has been securely put in place, a sort of pact is formed between the king and his people. This is a relationship that can be traced back to Confucionistic psychology. This relationship is that between the ruler and the ruled. In basic terms, in the relationship between the ruler and the ruled, it is the job of the ruler to make sure that the ruled, his subjects, are safe within their country and that they have the opportunity to pursue happiness and the necessities of life. The role of the ruled in this relationship is to serve and protect the ruler. The ruled may not overturn the ruler for another assembly or another ruler without the consent of the ruler that is presently in power. If the ruler were to make decisions that were not in the interest of his country and his people, his people would naturally want to rebel against him. Despite this desire, because of the fact that it was the people that put the ruler in place, to go against the ruler would be to go against themselves, and to go against oneself is impossible due to the laws of human nature. However, this situation should never arise because it is the duty of the ruler to serve his subjects, the people, and to ensure that his subjects stay safe

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Rulers are expected to protect the citizens (King George had…

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history people have had their own perspective about government and how much power it should hold. While some people believe in the saying “power to the people” and that government should play little to no role in the lives of society other’s believe all the power should be given to one specific person like a dictator. With these different beliefs, there is also those people who stand in the middle agreeing that the government should play big roles in society but the people should have just as much say as the government. After analyzing different authors views on government such as Machiavelli, Thomas Jefferson, and Lao Tzu it is clear that each have strong separate belief’s. As each of their political views are understandable and…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He doesn’t trust humans to abide by the contract on their won. In order for a social contract to work, the enforcer or authority must have absolute power. There can be no room for rebellion against authority, and so there must be censorship of the members of the society. If the authority is not absolute, the social contract will not work because there needs to be fear of punishment of anyone who breaks the contract. The sovereign is part of the society, but does not need to abide by the same laws as the citizens he rules over.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On one hand, John Locke believed that the state of nature is unsatisfactory, the government was therefore formed by social contract since people agree to transfer some of their rights to a centralized government in order to secure enjoyment of their properties. (Locke, 1764) Obviously, the formation of the American government is an example to illustrate Locke’s idea. The United States government derives its legitimacy and legal authority from the consent of the majority…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I truly believe that genetics are by far one of the biggest factors in determining the action and/or morals of an individual. In this debate, I personally agree with Thomas Hobbes in the idea that the nature of man is evil and as he states, “Everything humans beings voluntarily do is for pleasure or for self-preservation.” I feel this concept is heavily shown through the fact that all human beings react differently if put in the same situation. This shows that even though one's environment will be the same as someone else’s, people's personality determines the morals and decisions made by said individual. For example, some criminals have safe surroundings and good environments, but still make the conscious decision to commit a felony.…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Explain briefly. According to Hobbes, Locke and the Founders, people need a government because the task of a government is to maintain and protect people’s liberties in a society. For instance, a government can protect the weak from the strong (Gateways to Democracy, 7). In a society, people are often argued with each other due to their different beliefs.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Confucianism Dbq

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This moral righteousness trickles down from the ruler to the citizens creating a domino effect. As stated in Document 2, “The character of a ruler is like wind and that of the people is like grass. In whatever direction the wind blows, the grass always bends.”…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some people believe that complete freedom will bring chaos to individuals because humans need some sort of leadership, and some believe that freedom brings only opportunities to show how great some people truly are. These two contrasting views on freedom are explained through the philosophical texts and views of Martin Luther King Jr and Thomas Hobbes. Martin Luther King Jr enlightened the entire world with his views in Love, Law and Civil Disobedience and Thomas Hobbes showed the world a new side of political philosophy with his work in Leviathan. In both of these works one can see the contrasting views on freedom and can judge what influenced these views based on the time period that these philosophers lived.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Enlightenment Dbq

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages

    First of all, a philosopher named John Locke believed that the people had the right to choose their government and change it if they so pleased. “When the government is dissolved, the people are at the liberty to provide for themselves by erecting a new legislative…”(Doc A) This means that if the people did not feel like their government was providing and leading properly they could discard the previous government and start again. This would be highly beneficial because if the government failed they could not only get rid of it but prevent it before it became inadequate.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This much power was a lot for one man to possess. With this sole form of government there is no check or balance on the king’s power; he answers to himself alone. It is for these reasons that a monarchy is not always the best form…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is a novel about a monster that was created by a human. The monster was abandoned by his creator as well as the society right after he was born. Mary Shelley presented the ideas of many writers in her novel, Frankenstein, and this essay will explore the ideas put forth by different writers that are connected to Shelly’s Frankenstein.…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Starting off, they each had a distinctive understanding of human nature from one another. To Rousseau, humans in primitive times were "noble savages" and it is "civilization" that turned man into a "beast". Conversely, Hobbes believed that being "civilized" is a positive trait and being uncivilized or a "savage" is bad. Concerning human nature, Rousseau theorized that humans were innately good and generous, before being corrupted by the vices of civilization. Human life was most likely peaceful and compassionate as described in his opening line, “Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains.”…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thomas Hobbes’s motivation behind the book, Leviathan, is derived from the perception of a man and his intellect Hobbes purpose is to comprehend the condition of a man, which leads to the understanding of mankind, because the state of a man is nothing but artificial. To elaborate this notion, what dominates a man is his soul therefore the guidance is brought by a man’s joint and the consequences of an action are related to the nerves of a man. Hobbes claims the best way to understand mankind is to turn their thinking inwards and study oneself, which leads to understanding our thoughts, desires, and reflecting on the origin of these beliefs. According to Leviathan, the logical way to comprehend the thoughts of a man is through its senses; the…

    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Karl Marx were three opposing philosophers during the Enlightenment with their own interpretations on government and people. Hobbes believed society needed an absolute monarchy, “to confer all their power and strength upon one man.” Locke said that human nature had natural rights, and were therefore “not to be under the will or legislative authority of man.” Finally, Marx believed in communism, in which belongings are public. All of the philosophies had their own relation to the social contract, which was introduced by Jean Jacques Rousseau.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One argument that has prevailed throughout time and knowledge is the conflict between nature and nurture. This argument proposes that humans are either products of their genes and inherited traits, or of their environment and social relationships. Although many recognize that both nature and nurture play a role in humankind, this conflict still poses an issue till this day (Moore, 2001). This problem was brought to light during the eighteenth-century, also known as the Age of Enlightenment or Age of Reason. As this period promoted an increase of a well-educated society that emphasized reason, people began to investigate human behavior.…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays