Compare And Contrast Machiavelli And Lao Tzu

Improved Essays
Throughout history people have had their own perspective about government and how much power it should hold. While some people believe in the saying “power to the people” and that government should play little to no role in the lives of society other’s believe all the power should be given to one specific person like a dictator. With these different beliefs, there is also those people who stand in the middle agreeing that the government should play big roles in society but the people should have just as much say as the government. After analyzing different authors views on government such as Machiavelli, Thomas Jefferson, and Lao Tzu it is clear that each have strong separate belief’s. As each of their political views are understandable and …show more content…
Machiavelli is for a strong central government with all the power being in the hands of the leader. Lao Tzu believes that there should be little to no governing at all and that the people should not go against the natural order of the universe, living how they are meant to not how someone tells them too. A man named Thomas Jefferson though stands right in the middle of both Machiavelli and Lao Tzu. Being one of the writers of the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson stood for power to the people but with a government structure. He wanted to have a strong government but that government should be in favor of human rights. This government would listen to the people, help maintain natural rights and defeat anything that tried to take away these rights. Government should be put in place only to secure the rights of all man kind and never to pose any threat towards the rights of humans. If any type of government does go against independence and freedom, the people under that threatening government are allowed to abolish it and replace it with a new form of government. A famous line “that all men are created equal” is the start to the reasoning of becoming an independent state with a “for the people”

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Locke promotes more of an optimistic viewpoint arguing that the best form of government is a democracy. All people are born with rights and liberty and can be trusted to govern a society themselves and must ban together and create a working society. Where as Hobbes believes that people need to be restrained, Locke promotes that the point of a government is to serve as a third party for any issues, but not dictate. Unlike an absolute monarch, a democracy has very little power over its citizens. It stands on rules on consent and the ability to regulate people is drastically limited.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Many individuals believe liberty is tied to democracy, and political choice is extremely important to Mill. Mill believes that the best form of government is Representative Government. In Representative Government, an individual has the ability to protect himself and his views. As Mill says, “Let a person have nothing to do for his country, and he will not care for it.” Meaning that if you do not let an individual have a choice, then he will have no motivation to be productive for society as a whole. Every citizen should have a voice and participate in the government through some public function.…

    • 2226 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes believed that people can only live in peace when they turn over all rights to a sovereign. Hobbes social contract states that no matter what, you must abide by the sovereign, and nothing they do can violate the contract. Locke believed that if a sovereign starts to have too much power, the people have the right to rebel and fight for their rights. Hobbes views the sovereign as almost Godlike, to never be questioned and always obeyed. Locke on the other hand, follows a more modern view on government, power should not be absolute, and the people have the right to rebel if they feel they are being mistreated.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In effect, the government is something that the people themselves create as a means to mitigate conflicting parties and ensure that mean, which are born equal, are treated equally. While it is true that the ruling parties must have power over individuals and the ability to mandate certain laws these laws should always be focused on protecting the rights of the people. All of these theories on government, power, representation and leadership stem from the idea that people are born equally and that they rationally and logically want a society that protects these equalities from passion or aggression that opposes natural law. They are a necessity because while men may want cooperation and social constructs he is not infallible, and when a system is in place that acknowledges these fallibilities it prevents the state of war. These natural laws may seem contradictory when used as a means to support justified warfare, how can the right to life be taken away?…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hereditary successors were born just like any other baby in the world. Just because their dad was good king does not mean that they will have the same passion for their people as their dad. That is why the people should elect who they want to represent them. Paine described the government as having the power to protect people against their own evil, life, liberty, and property. He believed that society has the right to govern and protect themselves until too much harm was caused and only then should the government be allowed to intervene.…

    • 1939 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Lao Tzu’s ‘‘Thought from the Tao-te Ching’’and Machiavelli’s ‘‘The Quality of prince’’, they both develop how an outstanding ruler should be by striking a balance between the people and the ruler. Lao Tzu believes since human nature is a part of the holistic universe, all human beings should follow the Way in order to be original people. If the ruler is enlightened by the Way and Tao, he will not try to compete with others because the ruler realizes everything is ought to be moderate and appropriate for his people. Thus, Lao Tzu thinks that the ruler should be tolerant and flexible. However, Machiavelli insists that human nature is selfish and superficial.…

    • 1895 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The people were tired of being mistreated. The document was written to justify the colonist’s right to revolt against and become independent from England. The colonists had no representation in England to voice or defend their opinions and rights. The declaration states that the people have the right to overthrow a government that is not protecting their liberties, a concept that John Locke introduced with his natural rights. The document clearly states, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.-That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed..” This document educated the colonists on their own rights and they gained confidence and independence.…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He also believed that the rule of law should be a well-balanced mixture of human law and the law of nature. Laws should be made to help everyone. He begins to say that the “laws” put into the constitution should be a principle more than a specific law. Aristotle also makes sure to state that if “the laws have no authority, there is no constitution. The law ought to be supreme over all” (http://www.crf-usa.org).…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The separation of powers is still used today because the founders were afraid of having a tyrant in the government. To avoid the creation of a monarchy, they devised the separated of powers. The separation is made so that each branch can check on the others and ensure that no one branch is getting out of hand. “The accumulation of all powers, legislative, judiciary, in the hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed,…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This branch does not work to cooperate with the other branches to take over the United States and gain complete control of everyone inside the country. The anti federalists see the federal government as one that agree with each other and that will simply pass any law that they wish in order to make them richer and stronger, but in reality only truly necessary laws would be allowed to pass. They forget what happened back in the late 1700s when states and their governments power were greatly uneven. The states that could offer more economically would inevitably have more power leaving other states weak. The federal government helped fix this problem by creating a Union that helped every state.…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays