Immanuel Kant is another philosopher that would most likely disagree with colleges regulating hate speech. Kant believed in that people, as adults, have the ability to reason. As Kant states "The only thing needed for such enlightenment is freedom, and particularly…the …show more content…
First, it can take away form the students ability to make moral decisions. Also regulating hate speech can take away learning opportunities from the students. Being exposed to views that are out in the world, no matter if they may be wrong or just something you disagree with, is important. College can serve as a good place for these conversations about these controversial topics to happen.
I think that my debate team did well in creating thorough arguments against the regulation of hate speech on college campuses. I think our opening statement was very well. We worked up to starting our position on the debate as well giving some idea about what the rest of our team was going to say. Such as when Trevor said what philosophers supported our arguments and Abby briefly mentioning the case in Michigan that I then went into further detail about in the second