Pros And Cons Of Economic Freedom

Great Essays
In todays society, people are given various freedoms with which they can live their lives under their own personal terms. However, in the world of economics, these freedoms are not necessarily the same. Economic freedom is defined as, “the freedom to prosper within a country without intervention from a government or economic authority” (Business Dictionary). This is rarely the case in the real world. Companies and organizations are always held accountable for their actions. This is usually by the largest governments and economic regulatory bodies in the world. The regulation simply makes their economic decisions devoid of liberty. The government and other regulatory bodies restrict these companies by placing taxes, sanctions, protocols, and other types of laws on them. These types of restrictions can be imposed in several different ways, each of which have benefits and drawbacks to society. The government’s priority is not how prosperous the company is, they simply care about how stable the economy is after the company’s economic actions. Through the use of legislation, these government and regulatory bodies are able to force companies to make decisions they otherwise would not have made. This, as a result means that true economic freedom does not exist in our modern capitalism driven world.
To lead into the
…show more content…
In practice this does not occur. With true unregulated economic freedom, the economic environment allows true unlimited prosperity for both companies and average people. It should allow the concept of ‘risk versus return’ to be directly proportional. Instead, with restrictions on investments that people can make, it undermines the implied economic ‘freedom’. Governments impose sanctions on countries resulting in investments and capital to be frozen or seized. This causes the markets to shrink and eliminates investment opportunities for people.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Monopolies

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It is right to say that due to its dominant position, a monopoly is best placed to bear the risks that are associated with innovation. However, few monopolies take advantage of this factor since they have no competitors. In a competitive environment, as opposed to a monopolistic one, innovation is a necessity and not an option, whether a company can fund research or not. As long as the customers may highly demand the goods and services sold by a monopoly, the organization may show little incentive for improvement or innovation. Therefore, Thiel is not entirely right by saying, “monopolies can keep innovating since huge profit margins enable them to develop long-term plans” (Thiel and Blake 28).…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Business owners are allowed to be innovative and develop new products without the government interfering. According to James Doti, “Not only do I believe that self-interest benefits society, but I also contend that it is the only efficient way goods can be produced and distributed in a modern economic system” p. 7. When competition is created between consumers there is no monopoly on the market causing more goods and services to be available or produced. The only concern with a free market economy are market failures. The consequences of a market failure can be severe and have a major impact on an economic…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capitalism is an economic and political system where private owners, rather than the state or government, are in control of the country 's industry and trade. This means that the people are allowed to run and operate their own businesses without the discretion of the government telling them what to do and how to do it. Smith believes this is a good idea because it follows natural laws and has a hands-off view on economics, described by the term laissez-faire. With the government intervening with the economy, there would be a divergence from natural laws and in turn force these to become unnatural. When government stays out and allows it to be natural, things work because owners and businesses are constantly in a battle against one another trying to improve their products and make themselves superior over the others.…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    These countries are forces to get rid of subsidies even though economically elite countries, such as America, do not follow that rule, leading to less efficient production as they could not keep up with bigger businesses in other countries. Globalization could be beneficial if it were managed better rather than being a system that fosters…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The speaker of the source would also be opposed to socialist values interfering with the economy and private property by taxing the rich to provide for the poor, in addition to providing any sort of social program to help those who can’t help themselves. Unrestrained capitalism, as the source advocates, should not be embraced by society. In fact, the economy should have enough government intervention that while wide-spread success is achieved, independence and innovation are not sacrificed in the process. This idea can be supported through many examples and case studies. Three ideas , however, accurately sum up the benefits of having intervention in the economy: some closure of the gap between societal income classes, innovation is still accomplished, and, most of all, the people who participate in a government regulated system will experience a widespread area of prosperity in not only the economy, but in their everyday lives as…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The constraints lead to managers who are risk adverse and focus on the means versus ends, allow interest groups to intervene easier, reduce the importance of efficiency for equality, and force government bureaucracies to have more managers than the private sector (131-133). It is clear that bureaucracies are impacted and influenced in multiple ways. James Wilson’s examination of government bureaucracy provides no simple solution to the problem of the inefficient bureaucracy. Although it is suggested that government organization privatize to alleviate many of the aforementioned issues, that is not likely to happen. Wilson demonstrated that no sole issue is responsible for the inefficient government bureaucracy.…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reason for this because in the eyes of Marshall social rights provide on access to some level of economic welfare. In a capitalist society one is guaranteed the ability to pursue economic success but it does not guarantee it. One may say that it is impossible to guarantee economic prosperity in any political system. However, even though in a capitalistic society one is guaranteed certain civil rights these rights do not always lead to social rights. The reason for this is because in a capitalist society one is an individual will the right to pursue one’s goals.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nonetheless, a government’s task should be anything but these. The law of demand and supply regulate prices, previously established regulations control and restrict companies not tailored decrees to particular corporations for fear of monopoly and abuse; the market will autonomously govern that. If the market determines to make a company profitable or another one fail, then it must inherently be a good thing for everyone. As Hawkins puts it, “Under capitalism, the market reacts almost like a living thing and allocates resources where people want to spend their money.” (Hawkins). On that account, the market needs to be off-limits to the government for true capitalism to exist.…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Whether they like the old ways, or they simply dislike change, it might not be a smooth transition. Some would argue that upsetting the people is hardly worth the transition. Although, if the people were not already upset, there would be no need for this new situation of subsidies. It could also be said that changing the way of an economic system connected to a type of government could cause uproar. Once again, if the change was not needed, if the people were happy, then this would not be needed as a solution to the wealth…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This argument has two varieties which are: Businesses do not have necessary skills and experiences and they cannot afford to do anything except maximize profits (Winfield, 2014; 107). If both of these varieties are sound then it would provide very good reasons to believe in Shareholder Primacy. The one of the biggest social issues in the world is HIV/AIDs. Such businesses would not have skills and experiences to help these people but businesses will be able to help once they have generated enough profits to satisfy shareholders and remainder of profits will be used for charities. There are a lot of social issues that are not expected for businesses to overcome but it does not mean they are incapable of benefiting others.…

    • 1612 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics