The Impact Of Kaiser Wilhelm II, The Emperor Of Germany

Improved Essays
Kaiser Wilhelm II, the emperor of Germany (1888-1918), significantly impacted not only the governance of his country, Germany, but ultimately influenced the rising tensions between rival nations on an international level. Kaiser’s authoritarian upbringing caused dysfunctional relationships within his family and his British monarchy. This led to his hatred toward Britain. His erratic nature may not personally have decided that Germany should go to war, however he had put into place the structures which fostered a culture of militarism and hence an aggressive foreign policy for the outbreak of war, particularly in ousting Bismarck. Wilhelm’s bellicose and expansionistic motives to achieve a ‘place in the sun’, overthrew Bismarck’s realpolitik …show more content…
Bismarck strategically distracted France from pursuing revenge by encouraging French imperialism. The chancellor established a sturdy system of alliances to maintain peace in Germany, consolidate its economy and industries and to isolate its enemy. When Kaiser Wilhelm came into power in 1888, Bismarck feared the Kaisers political ineptitude for the nation. A radical shift in foreign policy occurred in 1890 when Bismarck was ousted of chancellorship. Wilhelm’s decisions had many ramifications, in particular, disturbing the progress and stability that Bismarck had achieved for Germany. Wilhelm and his pressure group, the Pan-German league, were greatly influenced by the notion of ‘World Policy’. Here, his desire to control colonies, international trade and achieve a status equal to Britain, completely neglected Bismarck’s hard work in using diffusing tensions between rival nations. Driven by Wilhelm’s love/hate relationship and rivalry with Britain, he wanted to expand his naval power and imperial possessions. This desire grew tension amongst the great powers and he became known as the ‘war lord. Kaiser Wilhelm conducted an unprecedented build-up of naval forces in Germany and took pride in his powerful navy calling it ‘Kaiser’s boast’. The nation’s perceptions began to change as the intemperate …show more content…
His rude, patronizing language and offensive comments, definitely contributed to rising tensions between Germany and great political powers; Britain. The event of which he played most significance in throughout his lifetime was his influence on the initiation of WW1. His incompetence to lead, was reinforced through the support he provided Austria-Hungary on their attack of Serbia. Kaiser was well aware of his military’s strength, According to historian Langer et al ‘he believed in force’. This fuelled a European arms race, whereby nations invested in new weapons and emerging technology to gain imperial possessions. Historian Robert K Massie believed ‘Wilhelm’s bombastic, thrusting nature, definitely contributed to the arms’. Wilhelm’s desire for power and wealth, overthrew his main concerns and priorities for the nation and this is seen through his support and ultimate outbreak of WW1.

Kaiser Wilhelm II played a profound significance on the national and international outcomes that resulted as in the July crisis of 1914. Kaisers ultimate support in the initiation of WW1, was the result of his upbringing, relationship with British monarchy, ousting of Bismarck

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Sidney Bradshaw Fay and Fritz Fischer both wrote about the origin of World War One in a time of German historiography controversy. Both of these men took the same event and analyzed it to come to different conclusions. Both men, though very similar in their amount of research and thought process, looked through different lenses at the same problem. Fritz Fischer was a native German, but he believed World War One was completely caused by Imperial Germany.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From 1862-1890, German Chancellor and Prussian Statesman Otto Von Bismarck utilized a foreign policy known as Realpolitik. Realpolitik is politics/diplomacy based on practical and logical political possibilities that completely excludes morals and ethics from decisions. Bismarck utilized this foreign policy in order to expand Prussia’s rule over Germany while minimizing any casualties or war from Prussia itself by manipulating other countries and people in order to achieve certain goals. For instance, in December 1863, Bismarck after seeing Denmark was planning to incorporate Schleswig, convinced Austria to invade Schleswig without involving Prussia at all in order to maintain the safety of his country while still gaining dominance over German…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    World War 1 Dbq Analysis

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the early hours of June, on the 28th day, in the year of 1914, this tragic event would begin a domino-effect which would lead Europe and the United States into what is now known as… World War I. On this day, Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife, Sophie, were assassinated by a Serbian group known as the “Black Hand” while visiting the country. The group’s intent was to gain independence from Austria-Hungary. But unbeknownst to them, it would turn into a large-scale battle that in essence, could have been settled locally. However, this event was considered the spark yet the question we are trying to answer is, “What was the underlying cause of World War I (WWI)?”…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    World War I was a significant and greatly corrosive war because it took everything away from the Germans, causing their economy to gradually decline, and eventually leading to the beginning of World War II. The immediate cause of World War I was the assassination of Austria-Hungary's Archduke, Franz Ferdinand. Austria-Hungary believed that the Serbians were the reprehensible group for committing this act because they knew Serbia was angered by the upcoming annexation of territories they believe should be theirs. After the assassination, chaos began to set in as countries allied together and, in a confusing sequence of events, declared war on other countries for their own personal reasons and benefits.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay Question: Was Hitler’s totalitarian rule one of great achievement or one of great depression and force. Ever since the treaty of Versailles on the 28 June 1919, Germany was left in a state of humiliation and despair with its society wanting of a dictator to bring them back to their former Glory. Adolf Hitler was the answer they were looking for and with Germany’s government struggling along with the great depression the people were eager for anything.…

    • 1310 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    US Honors Pre-WWI

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages

    U.S. Honors Pre-WWI Name: Yash Parikh_________________ Score: ______ Read Chapter 8. Do further research on databases and books. Your textbook is a resource but cannot be used as a cited source. You must have a Works Cited page. 1.…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The pursuit of national interest is always in the formula for the calculations of the rational decisions made by a nation. National interest is something each nation is thinking about when they go into war. World War I was the sacrifice of millions of lives to fulfill each nation’s national interest. William Kirby argues that, countries enter war because of their “rational calculations and national interests”. The source points out how the purpose of war is not irrational, it is rationalized by the beliefs of a nation and the benefits of military conflict.…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For each name and term, write to explain its significance: A) Russification: The ruling Romanov dynasty of Russia was determined to preserve iron control over this diversity. They established a policy of Russification, forcing Russian culture on all the national groups in the empire. This policy actually strengthened ethnic nationalist feelings and helped to defend Russia. The weakened empire finally could not survive the double shock of WWI.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The engines of militarism and ultranationalism drove World War II to the depths of darkness in human history. The wars in Europe and Asia shared aspects of ultranationalism and yet were dissimilar in how these nations arrived at World War II and how they reacted afterwards. There is no question as to whether ultranationalist motives and racial myths insinuated human rights violations. However, war guilt remains a controversial and unsettled issue today. While ideas of glorification, racial superiority, and genocide were implemented collectively by Germany and Japan, victimization distinguishes these nations as Germany suffers admittance and guilt even as Japan diffuses and claims exaggeration in retrospect to war guilt due to harm inflicted.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two of the greatest men in modern history, Otto von Bismarck and Adolf Hitler were determined to transform Germany into a great power. Despite being Prussian, Bismarck was nonetheless driven to unify Germany due to the fear of liberal ideology in a fragmented Germany. In essence, Bismarck was violent and would not stop at anything until his goals were realized with the eventual formation of a German state. Meanwhile, Adolf Hitler, an Austrian, sought to rid the nation of any race that was not “pure,” creating a utopian society based upon his radical ideology. Like Bismarck, Hitler was close-minded and would always go with his instinct, regardless of what was truly in the best interest of the masses.…

    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Heinrich Von Treitschke: Warfare and Nationalism to gain Liberation Germany faced the worst era of political imperial leadership, which suppressed the economy. During the nineteenth-century, Europe had many historical nationalists who studied their history and then glorified their nation's past (Kohn 21). A historian named Heinrich Von Treitschke vastly influenced Germans through his, political speech, named “The Greatness of War” shifting Germany’s perspective on the needs of the citizen’s committing to the country’s needs before theirs. My goal in this paper is to elaborate on how Treitschke impacted Germany’s view and nations mission by providing background history of Germany during the nineteenth century and connecting it to how Heinrich was glorious in bringing…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    President Wilson declares that Germany’s imperial government can affect whether we live in a world of peace and democracy or conflict and autocracy. The imperial government of Germany did not give the German rights like the United States and other countries had. Wilson believed that in order to have peace, democratic countries had to be partners. This proved to be impossible because the government of Germany sent spies all over the nation. As long as Germany was run by an autocratic government, they could not be trusted to work with.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Phobias of inferiority developed due to social Darwinism are what caused the leaders of five major powers, Germany, Austria-Hungary, Russia, Serbia, France, and Great Britain, to take a dramatic and unnecessary leap into a Europe-wide altercation. The idea of nationalism and heightened or decreased social stature was enough for these representatives to lose sight of what it meant to see from another’s point of view, as well as what it meant to be loyal in terms of kin and allies. European leaders avoided observing and guiding their actions based on the perspectives of their neighboring countries, allies, and adversaries. They all wanted to do what they believed would get their message across in a direct manner; the result is a war that would…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Although it is generally agreed upon that the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary was the event that sparked World War I, this singular act was really just the last straw. Such a bloody, widespread conflict, cannot be explained away or blamed on just one event, but as the war was so devastating, placing blame was something everyone seemed eager to do when it came time to create peace in 1919 with the Treaty of Versailles. As such, the question became: is it possible to put the blame for a world war on just one country? At the time, all fingers pointed to Germany, but in much the same way that the assassination was not world changing enough to carry all of the blame, the nation of Germany was not either. Germany undoubtedly…

    • 2318 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nationalism is based off the ideas of one feeling the superiority of their country against others based off of race, culture and power. Through the process of German unification it brought about the sense of nationalism and the ideas of a nation. A nation consists of a common culture, being financially powerful, and unified. Otto von Bismarck who was the Prime Minister of Prussia at this time helped succeed Germany to being one of the top five major powers of Europe. Bismarck wanted his country to be just for the German race and work together to fulfill that feeling of superiority against others.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays