The Pros And Cons Of Dictatorship

Improved Essays
A Dictatorship is a disreputable form of government in which one person or a small group of people, in this case being Saddam Hussein and his “Dirty Dozen”, have complete and utter control of a country. Dictators essentially have the right to do whatever they see fit with their people and country – restrict the legal and civil rights of their subjects. Subjects are technically citizens, although citizens are a part of a democracy, and have civil and legal rights, and have a say in government, whereas subjects are those of which their leaders authority to rule is not impacted by those who live in the country of dictation. Unlike a good government, or better known a democracy, Dictatorships don’t have free and fair elections, nor does one have …show more content…
In a dictatorship it is quite simply the opposite . Even though elections for parliament were held every four to seven years, whilst Hussein was in presidency of Iraq, the parliamentary weren’t to be considered free and fair (^) as only members of Hussein’s Baath community, or better known as his ‘Dirty Dozen’, were ever elected into parliament. Thus being, as for a parliament to be representative, the people need to be essentially responsible for who is in parliament representing them. Hussein’s Baath colleagues were always elected as his schemes needed the ‘dirty dozen’. All the deportations, the organized disappearances, murders, rapes, tortures, all of these cruel and inhumane methods were conducted by his sons, brothers and cousins. If the people actually had a say in who was in parliament then his methods would hopefully have been null and …show more content…
However under Hussein’s rule, the judicial system was completely under his control, with him and his associates directing judges to serve their interests for “the best of the government” (sarcasm). The judicial system essentially did the same job as it would in a democratic government, although in a democracy, the judiciary is an independent branch. Under his rule – or more broadly, all dictatorships – the judicial system and legal system is controlled through bribery and other sequences of power. Also, sentencing in Iraq was different. In Hussein’s Iraq as he was a militant president, his military and the secret police (the Mukhabarat) enforced the law through these groups assassinating, hanging, deporting, raping and torturing the criminals and/or the criminal’s family, rather than being given a sentence. Also note that torturing’s could and would be held for days on

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    He dismissed Parliament because the members often disagreed with his methods. But, he later reappointed…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    1. How is the idea of a dictator used in Gattaca and The Lot to ensure the obedience of citizens? - The tyrant encourages individuals to strive for the same ideal as those around them, which inevitably leads to their discontent as they become fixated on their flaws whilst dismissing their individuality. - The dictator acts as a force that compels individuals to discriminate those who do not conform to society’s standards.…

    • 1767 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Only Fahrenheit 451’s government is more like a dictatorship. Do they even vote anymore? Maybe there is a king. “They may declare war within the hour.” You think a government…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    In a dictatorship the person in charge of the country can develop become power hungry or developed a god…

    • 2109 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Hereditary Representative Democracy King Mosiah introduced an assembly of rulers sustained by the people from a cast of representative judges. The judges formed the authoritative group who vouchsafed, interpreted and enforced the laws of the nation. These judges inherited their offices through what can be called a hereditary democracy because no judge ruled over the people without the consent of the majority and could be replaced depending on the will of the people. The judgeships consisted of lower and higher judges and the chief judge. The hereditary transfer prevailed in this democracy for as long as a civil government functioned among Nephites.…

    • 1806 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As the Americans were creating their new government, they kept the features of the government they did not want in mind. They wanted to ensure that their government was very different from the monarchy that Britain had by trying to make a central government where its powers were not necessarily weak, but where the power rested in the people. Another feature that the Americans did not want in their new government was unequal representation. They despised the lack of representation they had in Parliament, and as they created their new government they ensured that every state was represented equally so the concerns of the people could be properly addressed. Because of this, the American public was adamant that the new government’s powers were…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In both a modern day dictatorship such freedoms as the Freedom of speech and press are repressed. And in some cases resources and food could be limited in a county that could cause civil unrest and lead to revolutions. Most if not all of…

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    After World War One, there were many types of new government that emerged from the chaos of the war. But, the two major governments were dictatorships and democracies. In Germany, Italy and Russia, the dictators Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini and Josef Stalin came to power after the fall of democracy in each country. There were many reasons for the change to dictatorship, including inflation, unemployment and a lost sense of trust in democracy. These dictatorships ruled for many years during the interwar period.…

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This form of ruling is used to control the people, rather than allowing democracy to influence the…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Democrat and Dictator Franklin Roosevelt focused on the financial difficulties that the United States faced. The taxes were increased, yet the people were unemployed with little means to pay the taxes. “ More important, a host of unemployed citizens face the grim problem of existence, and an equally great number toil with little return” (Roosevelt, 1933). Franklin Roosevelt’s task was to stimulate the economy and decrease the unemployment rate. “Our greatest primary task is to put people to work” (Roosevelt, 1933).…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the world’s past, dictators and their political systems have done things to solidify their power and to command their citizens. Dictators for example are, Louis XIV of France and Joseph Stalin of the Soviet Union. The work done by these dictators and their political systems had major consequences on their citizens and their countries. Louis the XIV of France exercised the finances of France, increased the size of the French military, and removed the Edict of Nantes from French society to solidify his power. Joseph Stalin of the Soviet Union in Russia used propaganda to limit information, controlled the Soviet economy by increasing…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    A democracy lets the people vote for who they want as a leader (President) and authoritarian is forced to become the leader. We had an election not to long ago and the turnout was amazing, but people who were against it could vote for who they wanted. In an authoritarian government the leader is forced into power. Part of the authoritarian government is a…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Just as humans, dictators are not born evil but are influenced enough to gain power and abuse it. If one has the power to control all, then they could use it to their own advantage. Stories such as Macbeth by William Shakespeare and Animal Farm by George Orwell illustrate how such characters like Macbeth and Napoleon rise to power to use it for themselves as similarity to dictators like Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Benito Mussolini. By doing this, dictators blind the eyes of the people by stealing their freedoms through manipulation to gain innate superiority.…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The article declares that among the countries that are in some transitional phase between dictatorship and democracy “fifty percent do better on political liberties than on civil ones” (Zakaria). The author Fareed Zakaria called these countries illiberal democracies. According to him this form of democracy is typical for non-Western countries which embraced it from France (the French model). Although these countries are democracies, according to their official form of government, but in practice the leaders of these countries abuse the power and the citizens have many of their rights limited or violated. All the power is usually concentrated in the hands of one and the same person.…

    • 2348 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Just because he has authority doesn’t mean he should be a dictator, he should let people feel free to oppose him and say what they want. This is similar to Santiago’s example because he wasn’t given permission to leave the camp even though he requested to leave many times. Also, it is similar because he was tortured by giving him a ‘Code Red’ in order to improve his performance which was something he wasn’t capable of. This also happens in our region, as the government imprisons people who oppose them and their orders. Moreover, many villains which killed people in the revolution are either still free or the verdict isn’t out yet.…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays