Socrates teachings are known mostly through the works of his students, and in the Symposium he is the last of the party attendants to speak. Unlike the previous speakers, Socrates does not give a eulogy on love, at least not initially. Instead, he begins by asking Agathon a few questions with the consent of Phaedrus. Socrates begins by stating to Agathon, “Is the nature of Love such that he must be love of something, or can he exist absolutely without an object?” (Symposium, sect. 199d). It is here that Socrates asks whether or not Love is the love of something or love in the same manner that exists between family members, too which Agathon agrees that Love is definitely the love of something. This answer prompts Socrates to get Agathon to also accept that Love desires the thing he is in love with and to somewhat agree that Love loves and desires something that is not in his possession. From here Socrates concludes that if Love was to love and desire something, then that absolutely means that Love does not have that particularly something in his possession. He makes this conclusion through an
Socrates teachings are known mostly through the works of his students, and in the Symposium he is the last of the party attendants to speak. Unlike the previous speakers, Socrates does not give a eulogy on love, at least not initially. Instead, he begins by asking Agathon a few questions with the consent of Phaedrus. Socrates begins by stating to Agathon, “Is the nature of Love such that he must be love of something, or can he exist absolutely without an object?” (Symposium, sect. 199d). It is here that Socrates asks whether or not Love is the love of something or love in the same manner that exists between family members, too which Agathon agrees that Love is definitely the love of something. This answer prompts Socrates to get Agathon to also accept that Love desires the thing he is in love with and to somewhat agree that Love loves and desires something that is not in his possession. From here Socrates concludes that if Love was to love and desire something, then that absolutely means that Love does not have that particularly something in his possession. He makes this conclusion through an