The Fourth Amendment Analysis

Improved Essays
To expound on the process of the Fourth Amendment, we must recognize and interpret its meaning. The Fourth Amendment is the protection of our citizen privacy against certain governmental interferences (Bohm & Haley, 2014, p. 105). The procedural rights of The Fourth Amendment are the search and seizure of citizens property and/or person in violation of the criminal law, with a meaningful interference by the government. There has to be probable cause. A search and seizure have to be within reason, with a descriptive warrant explaining exactly what is to be searched and seized, signed by a judge. Search and seizure without a warrant can be conducted if the citizen volunteer permission. The Fourth Amendment is used when one feels their rights are offended.
The Fifth Amendment is the protection against the incrimination of self. Within a criminal case, the individual cannot be a
…show more content…
121), however, parts of a trial can be closed if there should be an undercover informant. One has the right to have an impartial jury, unbiased with a jury trial. The Sixth Amendment assures a specific location or venue as to where the crime was committed, the trial must take place within that location. A suspect has the right to know why they are being held. The defendant has the right to be present during the trial to confront the opposing witness. The Sixth Amendment gives the right to counsel, to a lawyer or court-appointed attorney.
The Eighteenth Amendment is the protection against excessive bails and fines. This Amendment also protects individuals against cruel and usual punishment (Bohm & Haley, 2014, p. 125). "In 1996, the Supreme Court handed down Whren v. the United States, which prohibits inquiry into police officers' subjective motivations in conducting a search or seizure when there is reasonable suspicion or probable cause on which to base the search" (Yeomans, 2015,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    What Is Probable Cause?

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Miranda rights are his right to remain silent, anything he says can be used against him in the court of law, his right to an attorney, if he cannot afford one then one will be appointed for him, and his right to terminate the interview at any time. This will protect his Fifth Amendment right and avoid his defense attorney from invoking the Exclusionary rule during trial. According to Carmen (2010) “Under the exclusionary rule, evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment cannot be used in a criminal trial against the victim of the illegal search and seizure. The Constitutions does not require this remedy; it is a doctrine of judicial design.” Mr. May’s invokes his Fifth Amendment to remain silent and request an attorney; at this point Cruz and Hamrick have no choice but to hold him over to see a magistrate to a preliminary hearing. During the preliminary hearing the judge will decide if there was enough probable cause to arrest and…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They both originate from a dispute between two parties, they both have pretrial procedures, they both have discovery processes, and they are both brought before a judge and jury. The major differences between them is the requirement for more stringent efforts to prove a violation occurred in criminal cases, the discovery requirements, and the burden of proof required to establish guilt. The reason for this, is if found guilty of a criminal matter certain rights are taken away from the guilty party. For example, their freedom when incarcerated, right to vote, right to possess firearm, and the social stigmas associated with being a convicted…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also, there must be a legal basis for the appeal such as alleged material error in the trial, despite not because the losing party did not agree with the verdict. If the defendant was convicted through the plea bargain then the right of appealing is demolished. Any convicted offenders are able to appeal their case based on the matter of law. When there is an appeal, the court reviews the case looking at the previous proceedings in the lower courts and will not consider new evidence. The appellate courts look at the record and the written briefs filed by the defendant and the prosecutor of the appeal.…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Due Process Clause

    • 1574 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Fifth Amendment protects the criminals right to not testify against himself and to remain silent. If the defendant decides to remain silent then the prosecution has to prove the defendant is guilty beyond reasonable…

    • 1574 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Meaning that the police or any other agency cannot enter a home or business to search it and seized evidence unless they have permission of a judge to do so. That is to say, probable cause must exist when there are facts and circumstances within the arresting authority, knowledge and of which they had reasonably trustworthy information’s is sufficient to warrant an individual for reasonable caution in the belief that an offense has been committed (see Draper v. United States (1959). Probable Cause Law enforcement face difficult situations on a daily basis. But, in order for a warrant to be issued, make an arrest or seized evidence or is there probable cause to proceed without a warrant. There is a standard demonstrating the need for a warrant by the government and must show that there is “probable cause.” Due Process of Law Lastly, the Fifth Amendment and the Fourthteeth Amendment rights prohibit the United States government from “deprivations of life, liberty, or property, without due process of the law.” The due process guarantee includes the rights outlined in the Constitution as well as others not mentioned above.…

    • 1513 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another important aspect of the legal accountability of police is judicial examination in the courts. This operates when judges and defence lawyers examine the quality and sources of police evidence. Evidence illegally such as through an illegal search or illegal telephone intercept is usually subject to the exclusionary rule as a deterrent to illegal conduct. The courts should also be alert for possible fabrications of evidence false evidence and the suppression of exculpatory evidence. Finally, a free Press is essential to police accountability.…

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because of the writ of habeas corpus guarantee, an individual cannot be held for more than a short period of time without being formally charged with a crime. Some of the constitutional safeguards for criminal defendants set forth in the Bill of Rights besides, article I prohibits ex post facto laws, law that makes an act punishable as a crime even if the action was legal at the time it was committed. In addition, Bill of detainer, a law declaring an act illegal without a judicial trial. Followed by Due process Law, this means that laws must be applied fairly and equally to all people, especially to a citizen accused of a crime. The 4th Amendment protects people from unreasonable searches seizures.…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The four amendments of the Bill of Rights that deal with criminal procedure are the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments. (Neubauer & Fradella, 2015) The four amendments of the Bill of Right that deal with criminal procedure protect citizens. The Fourth Amendment states that the law enforcement cannot arrest a citizen or search his or her property unless there is probable cause. The Fifth Amendment…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These amendments were intended to guard the American citizen’s rights, as well as their property. The 5th Amendment establishes a variety of rights related to criminal, as well as civil litigation 's. In felonious lawsuits, the Fifth Amendment promises the defendant the right to a grand jury, prohibits double jeopardy, and shields them from self-incrimination. When it comes to the Fifth Amendment, one landmark case that applied it was Miranda v. Arizona. In this case, the Supreme Court concluded that offenders, who are apprehended, must be read their rights in regards to self-incrimination and their right to counsel, before law enforcement begins to interrogate them.…

    • 1347 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    When a person becomes a criminal defendant they are granted constitutional rights that can be used to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The result of the Crawford v Washington case defined the standard for determining the admission of hearsay statements in cases permitted under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment. In conclusion, the Crawford v. Washington case impacted the Supreme Court of Virginia’s decision in Briscoe v. Commonwealth and Cypress v. Commonwealth. The defense attorneys and prosecutors in Virginia should proceed in caution of the sixth amendment with confronting witnesses. Keywords, Briscoe v. Commonwealth, Cypress v. Commonwealth, Crawford v. Washington, Sixth Amendment The Supreme Court of the…

    • 1007 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays