Double Jeopardy Case Study

Improved Essays
In regards to basic criminal procedures, the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution contains some very important basic rights which enable citizens to have protection against the government. These rights consist of the following; due process, substantive due process, Miranda warning, indictment, self-incrimination, grand jury, jury, double jeopardy, and collateral estoppel, immunity from prosecution, eminent domain, takings, and lastly territorial jurisdiction. Nevertheless, this investigation will cover the basic and many varied interpretations of double jeopardy and how they applied to the local case of Robert Nicholas Angleton. Double jeopardy is within the United States Constitutions Fifth Amendment, “The State with all its …show more content…
Before the couple had married, they were married to other people; they had met briefly at Roberts’s place of business. Robert Angleton made a majority of his living bookmaking, most of the proceeds being obtained illegally the couple and their two children lived an extravagant life within the River Oaks community here in Harris County Texas. The Angleton’s lived in a lovely home, their children attended private school, Doris Angleton had a very pleasant and outgoing personality that led her to being a popular socialite who had many friends; her husband on the other hand was viewed as being “rough around the edges”. Those who were around the Angleton’s were unaware of how Robert made his living and those that did know did not seem to regard it as being “illegal”. Robert Angleton was said to have been an excellent provider for his family and doted on his family regularly with expensive gifts, it was said that his wife, Doris was beginning to grow lonely within their marriage and had reached out to chatroom websites in an attempt to cure her loneliness and eventually ended up meeting someone in person. Tension began to spread within their marriage and Doris had filed for divorce, requesting half of the couples combined assets, the couple was attempting to remain cordial with one another and were attending counseling together all had seemed well or at least was portrayed to seem well. Doris Angleton made a trip home to pick up a softball bat that was forgotten and did not return to the game. Later on, Robert Angleton dropped his children off after their softball game and discovered the body of his wife Doris Angleton who had been shot thirteen times there were no signs of forced entry into the home. However, during their marriage together, it was also rumored that Roberts brother Roger Angleton had made

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Greenlease Kidnapping An Institute for small children in Kansas City, Missouri called Sister Morad of the French of Notre Dame De Sion was having school on September 28, 1953. As the children were having school, there was a knock at the door and as one of the teachers opened the door to a woman who said she was the Aunt of Bobby Greenlease. Robert Cosgrove Greenlease Jr., refer to as Bobby, was the six-year-old son of Robert C Greenlease Sr. Robert Sr. was a weathly automobile dealer who resided in Mission Hill, Kansas City, Missouri. Bobby’s Aunt informed the teacher that Bobby’s mother had suffered a heart attack and taken to St. Mary’s Hospital.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Benton argued that since he was found not guilty for the larceny charge before that it was double jeopardy. The question at state with Benton’s case is if the Fifth Amendment was violated by the second indictment, trial, and conviction for larceny…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    5. What constitutional precedent was set by this case? Answer – Double jeopardy protections are not applicable to the states. 6. What were the political/policy implications of the case?…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The fifth amendment is part of the bill of rights in which each amendment specifies not only our rights but our protections against the government when needed. It is stated within the amendment that “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury…”. Similarly, it is also divided into three separate clauses that enhance the major phases when dealing in a criminal investigation and prosecutions. The first one is the grand jury, secondly right to self-incrimination, and finally double jeopardy. The way it came to be in this order was due to not only history, but by also the clarification Alfredo Garcia initiated.…

    • 1912 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wrongful Conviction On the morning of August 10, 1984, Deborah Sykes was brutally stabbed, sexually assaulted, and eventually killed in Winston-Salem, North Carolina. The man convicted for her murder was Darryl Hunt, a 19 year old boy that would go on to spend 20 years in prison for a crime he did not commit. Hunt was convicted based on eye-witness testimony and informants, but was later exonerated based on DNA evidence that matched a man that was caught just a few months after the murder took place. This case is an exemplar of the strength of DNA evidence and the fragility of eyewitness testimony.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The criminal has the privilege to have a sensible safeguard set for the wrongdoing he or she perpetrated and as indicated by the genuine flight hazard which he or she may force. In 1963 a man known as Ernesto Arturo Miranda was captured of charges he actually admited nightfall of interrigation, and was sentenced, and sentenced 20-30 years. Miranda's court apointed lawyer contended taht he was not educated he has a privilege to insight, and his admission was not volontary. The Arizona Incomparable Court ruled upon this case, and announced that Miranda was unconscious of the rights allowed under the fifth amendent's self implication provision, and the sixth alterations right to a lawyer.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fifth Amendment protects against unfair treatment in the legal processes, and from the government abusing their power. The fifth amendment states "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. "(Bill of…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land made up of the 7 articles and the U.S. Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights is a document with a group of Amendments, which are articles added to the U.S Constitution. The Fifth Amendment was introduced into the U.S Constitution on September 5th, 1789. The five clauses within the Fifth Amendment stay consistent with the meaning of the Bill of Rights in that they promote a balance between the people and the government, and limits on government power and procedure. The Fifth Amendment contains five protections vital to a person accused of crime; the right to Grand Jury, to double jeopardy charges, compelled self-incrimination, due process, and just compensation.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution is one of the important section for protecting citizens for committing a crime unless it is properly indicted by a law enforcement officer. The Fifth Amendment states that no person shall be held accountable for a serious except a grand jury decides that the evidence presented is then an indictment is issued. State and the country must respect your legal rights under the United States Constitution. The Fifth Amendment was established on September 5, 1789 as part of the Bill of Rights with ¾ of the states’ vote. The government does not have the authority to force an individual to testify against themselves, so the court uses witness and evidences on the accused suspect.…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda V. Arizona

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Supreme Court ruling of 1966 in Miranda vs. Arizona has had a significant impact on the conduct of law enforcement agencies in the United States to present day. The 5th amendment is a privilege enjoyed by all American citizens providing that no suspected criminal can be forced or compelled to answer any questions unless directed by the relevant grand jury. Ernesto Miranda arrest was on suspicion of having committed a robbery on March 13th, 1963 in Phoenix, Arizona, he was neither read his rights nor was he granted the right to counsel. The 23-year-old suspect was unjustly questioned for over two hours resulting in the subsequent confession of not one, but three crimes, robbery, kidnapping and rape earning…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Fifth Amendment

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Smith argued that the jury said no and he was not guilty, but putting him on trial again would be a violation of the Fifth Amendment’s double jeopardy clause. This clause states that you cannot be charged for the same crime twice. The state court of appeals rejected Smith’s argument and said that there was no Fifth Amendment violation. The Supreme Court then took a vote. They decided that if a judge ruled the defendant not guilty then they could not reverse the not guilty verdict at a later trial.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The constitutional issue that arose in the court’s ruling in this case is centered on the first and second phases, out of the three that unfold in a criminal proceeding. The phases include; decision to arrest and charge, innocent until proven guilty, and imposition of the sentence (Betterman). Betterman argued violation or unfairness of the checks and balances associated with the first and second phases. The statute of limitations provides protection against a delay in the arrest and charge phase.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The PATRIOT Act was framed swiftly and passed within 45 days to serve as an anti-terrorism legislation in wake of the September 11, 2001 attacks, in the name of national security. The complex Act was subject to almost no Congressional deliberation or debate and was promulgated by the then President George Washington Bush on 26 October, 2001. This Act was designed to extend law enforcement's supervision and surveillance and investigative powers. The provisions of the Patriot Act also are some of the most significant threats and breaches to civil liberties, privacy, and democratic traditions which have been embodied in the US history and Constitution.1 The Patriot Act, although framed to protect the American citizens from terrorism, has been criticized for a number of reasons and rightly so. Certain provisions of the Act stand contrary to the…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Maryland - Significance). He was adamant on the fact that “double jeopardy barred persecution on the larceny count because the first jury had acquitted him of that offense” (Benton v. State). Despite his claims, the Court of Special Appeals ruled against it and denied certiorari. Ultimately and after much deliberation, the Supreme Court reviewed the case and decided that the Fifth Amendment protection against double jeopardy had, indeed, been infringed…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Double Jeopardy, in the Fifth Amendment, claims that one cannot be tried twice for the same crime. Once a trial has ended the government cannot choose to include new evidence and put a person on trial again. The right of Double Jeopardy is extremely important because it hinders the government from having the power to continuously try a person for the same crime. To be put on trial multiple times can get expensive, therefore it would make the most sense to only put a person on trial once. Although people should be tried if they have sincerely done something wrong, Double Jeopardy protects the defendants from having to constantly fear that they will be imprisoned.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays